PANDANGAN ISLAM TERHADAP TRADISI DAN KEMODENAN (Islamic View Of Heritage And Modernity)

Khalif Muammar A. Haris

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Umat Islam hari ini, tidak terkecuali para intelektualnya, mengalami dilema dalam menyikapi tradisi. Golongan modenis dan pascamodenis beranggapan bahawa tradisi adalah beban yang harus dilupakan untuk maju ke hadapan. Pada ekstrim yang berlawanan, golongan tradisionalis pula cenderung mengkuduskan tradisi sehingga menganggap segala yang diperturunkan tidak boleh diganggu gugat dan harus diterima sebagaimana adanya tanpa apa-apa perubahan. Ada juga  yang  menyerukan  agar  kita  mengambil  jalan  tengah  dengan  menerima apa yang benar dan baik dan menolak apa yang salah dan buruk, tanpa suatu penjelasan ilmiah yang mencukupi. Makalah ini akan cuba menjelaskan nilai dan tempat yang wajar bagi tradisi atau turath mengingat bahawa ketidakjelasan dalam hal ini telah menyebabkan berlakunya banyak kekeliruan dan perpecahan di kalangan umat Islam, sehingga saling menyesatkan dalam perkara-perkara yang remeh, kecil atau furË‘. Makalah ini juga mengkritik pendekatan liberal dalam berhadapan dengan turath yang dapat mengakibatkan keruntuhan autoriti keagamaan (religious authority). Di samping itu makalah ini juga membahas bagaimanakah sikap yang sewajarnya ada pada umat Islam dalam menghadapi modeniti (modernity) Barat, juga mengkritik pendekatan golongan modenis- sekular yang cenderung meniru dan menerima secara a priori modeniti Barat. Ia berusaha memberikan perspektif yang jelas terhadap modeniti Barat, dan konsep pembangunan dan kemajuan berdasarkan kepada pandangan alam (worldview) Islam.

ABSTRACT

By and large, Muslims, including the intellectuals among them, are having problem in dealing with religious tradition. The modernists consider tradition as  a  burden  which  keeps  the  ummah  from  moving  forward.  From  the  other extreme  viewpoint,  the  traditionalists  regard  tradition  as  sacred  and  cannot be changed. Some would argue that Muslims should adopt what is good and true throwing away what is regarded as bad and false without an adequate explanation. Therefore, this paper is an attempt to explicate the true place and value of tradition in Islam, considering the fact that the current problem of division and confusion has its root in the wrong conception of it. Moreover, this paper criticizes the liberal approach toward tradition which can destroy the religious authority in Islam. In addition it also discusses what is appropriate attitude Muslims should have toward Western modernity, and criticizes the secular  and  modernits’ tendency  in  accepting  western modernity  in  a  priori manner. It is an attempt to give a clear perspective on Western modernity, development, progress based on the worldview of Islam.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Quran. 2001 Tafsir Pimpinan al-Rahman Kuala Lumpur: Darul Fikir.

Abi Daud. t.th. Sunan Abi Daud. al-Malahim no.3740. Beirut: Nor al-Kitab.

Abdul Halim Mahmud. 2000. Islam dan Akal. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Abou El-Fadl, K. 2003. Speaking In God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women. Oxford: Oneworld.

Abou El-Fadl, K. 2009. Islamic Authority dlm. Kari Vogt et al., New Directions in Islamic Thought: Exploring Reform and Muslim Tradition, hlm. 129-144. London & New York: I.B. Tauris.

Adonis. 1994. Al-Thabit wa al-Mutahawwil. Beirut. Dar al-Saqi.

Arkoun, M. 1994. Rethinking Islam. Ed. Robert D. Lee, Boulder: Westview Press.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. 2007. Tinjauan Ringkas Peri Ilmu dan Pandangan Alam. Pulau Pinang: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.

al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. 2001. Risalah untuk Kaum Muslimin. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.

al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. 1995. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: an Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.

al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. 1993. Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.

al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. 1988. The Oldest Known Malay Manuscript: A 16th Century Malay Taranslation of the Aqa’id al-Nasafi. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Publication University of Malaya.

al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. 1972. Islam dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. 1969. Prelimenary Statement on a General Theory of the Islamization of the Malay-Indonesian Archipelago. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Bauman, Z. 1991. Modernity and Ambivalence, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bennabi, M. 1994. The Problem of Ideas in the Muslim World Petaling Jaya: ABIM.

Bloom, A. 1987. The Closing of American Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

al-Bukhari, Muhamad b. Ismail b. Ibrahim 1991 Sahih al-Bukhari: Beirut al- maktabah al-‘Asariyyah

Coser, L.A. 1977. Masters of Sociological Thought. London: Harcourt.

Dallmayr, F. 2008. Adorno and Hedegger on Modernity. In Iain MacDonald & Krzysztof Ziarek. Adorno and Heidegger: Philosophical Questions, hlm. 167-182. California: Stanford University Press.

Delanty, G. 2007. Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishing.

Encyclopedia Britannica. 2011.

Ibn Taymiyyah. t.th. Majmu‘ Fatawa Ibn Taymiyyah, Kaherah: Dar al-wafa.

al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid. t.th. Ihya’ Ulum al-Din. Kaherah: Maktabah Fayyad.

al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid. 1983. al-Iqtisad fi al-I‘tiqad. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah.

Habermas, J. 1985. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Massachusetts: The MIT Press Cambridge.

Hasan Hanafi. 1980. al-Turath wa al-Tajdid. Kaherah: al-Markaz al-‘Arabi li al-Bahth wa al-Nashr.

Hermansen, M. K. 1996. Modernity and Religious Worldviews –the Challenge of Classical Islamic Religious Thought for Contemporary Muslim Intellectuals. In. Sharifah Shifa al-Attas (ed.). Islam and The Challenge of Modernity: Historical and Contemporary Contexts, hlm. 509-534. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.

Horkheimer, M., Theodor W. & Adorno. 1973. Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Allen Lane.

Fazlur Rahman. 1970. Islamic modernism: Its scope, methods and alternatives. International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, Vol.1. no halaman

Khalif Muammar A. H. 2009. Atas Nama Kebenaran: Tanggapan Kritis Terhadap Wacana Islam Liberal, Ed. ke-2. Bangi: Institut Alam & Tamadun Melayu.

Khalif Muammar A. H 2007. Absolutisme dan Watak Pasrah Penghalang Pembangunan Semula Tamadun Islam. Pemikir, Bil. 49, Julai-Ogos- September.

Khalif Muammar A. H. t.th. Menuju Era Baru dalam Pergerakan Islam dlm. www.hidayatullah.com dan www.khairaummah.com

Khursid Ahmad. 1994. Islamic Approach to Development. Islamabad: Institute of Policy Studies.

Muhammad Ali Hashim. 2009. Harian Metro. 26 November.

Muhammad Ali Jum‘ah. 2009. al-Tariq Ila al-Turath al-Islami. Kaherah: Nahdat Misr.

al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. 2005. Kayf Nata‘amal ma‘a al-Turath wa al-Tamazhub wa al-Ikhtilaf. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risalah.

al-Raniri, Nuruddin. Durr al-Fara’id bi SharÍ al-‘Aqa’id. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia MSS 3308 (A).

al-Tarmidhi, Muhammad b. Isa b. Surah. 1986. Sunan al-Tirmidhi. al-Riyadh: Maktabah al-Ma’arif.

The Encyclopedia of Religion. 1987. London: Macmillan.

Vattimo, G. 1988. The End of Modernity. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

Wan Mohd Nor Wan Daud. & M. Z. Uthman. 2010. Knowledge, Language, Thought and The Civilization of Islam: Essays in Honor of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Wan Mohd Nor Wan Daud. 2009. Dewesternization and Islamization: Their Epistemic Framework and Final Purpose. Kertas kerja dibentangkan dalam The International Conference on Islamic University Education in Russia and Its Surrounding Areas, Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia. Organized by Russian Islamic University (RIU-Kazan) & the Institute of Islamic Culture (IIC-Moscow) dengan kerjasama the Federation the Universities of the Islamic World (FUIC) dan ISESCO. 27-30 Sept.

Wan Mohd Nor Wan Daud. 2005b. Pembangunan di Malaysia: Ke Arah Satu Kefahaman Yang Lebih Sempurna. Kuala Lumpur: Akademi Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya.

Wan Mohd Nor Wan Daud. 1998. The Educational Philosophy and Practice of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas: An Exposition of the Original Concept of Islamization. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.

Wan Mohd Nor Wan Daud. 1998. Penjelasan Budaya Ilmu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


  ISSN: 1985-6830

eISSN: 2550-2271

JURNAL HADHARI: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Institut Islam Hadhari
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi
Selangor, MALAYSIA.


Phone: +603-8921 7187/7176/6994
Fax: +603-8921 6990
Email: jhadhari@ukm.edu.my

Web: ejournals.ukm.my/jhadhari