Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat bagi Kanak-kanak yang Berkonflik dengan Undangundang: Teori, Kerangka Perundangan dan Halatuju di Malaysia

Mohd Al Adib Samuri

Abstract


Community service order is one of the suitable order for children in conflict with the law. Unfortunately in Malaysia,
this particular order still not been stipulated under the Child Act 2001 (Act 611) for the juvenile (under 18 years old).
Eventhough Malaysian Governement had mentioned about their plan to implement this order, there is lack of legal
research regarding this order, in terms of theoritical, legal framework and the implementation. Therefore, the objective
of this article is to discuss the community service order in theoritical perspective, legal framework and the potential
implementation towards children in conflict with the law in Malaysia. This article found that the community service
order is based on the rehabilitation theory dan one of the leading orders that upheld the best interest of the child. With
this order, the juvenile offenders would be integrated with the society and eventually would reduce recidivism rate and
potentially rehabilitate them. This research is significant as it contributes to the development of the legal framework
for the community service order of the children in conflict with the law in Malaysia.


Keywords


community service order, children in conflict with the law, rehabilitation

Full Text:

PDF

References


RUJUKAN

Alarid, L. F., Cromwell, P. F. & Del Carmen, R. V.

Community-Based Corrections. United

States of America: Cengage Learning.

Utusan Malaysia. 2011. Pinda akta elak kanakkanak

dipenjara, 27 Julai, [atas talian],

h t t p : / / w w w. u t u s a n . c o m . m y / u t u s a n / i n f o .

a s p ? y = 2 0 1 1 & d t = 0 7 2 7 & p u b = u t u s a n _

malaysia&sec=Dalam_Negeri&pg=dn_08.

htm&arc=hive, [26 Disember 2011].

Caputo, G. A. 2004. Intermediate Sanctions in

Corrections. Texas: University of North Texas

Press.

Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat bagi Kanak-kanak yang Berkonflik dengan Undang-undang:

Teori, Kerangka Perundangan dan Halatuju di Malaysia 17

Champion, D. J. & Mays, G. L. 1991. Transferring

Juveniles to Criminal Courts: Trends and

Implications For Criminal Justice. Westport, CT:

Praeger Publishers.

Claster, D. S. 1992. Bad Guys and Good Guys: Moral

Polarization and Crime. Westport, CT: Greenwood

Press.

Clear, T. R. & Braga, A. A. 1995. Community

corrections. Dlm. Crime, disunting oleh Wilson, J.

Q. & Petersilia, J. San Francisco: ICS Press.

Cook, J. R. 2001. Asphalt Justice: A Critique of The

Criminal Justice System in America. Praeger,

Westport CT: Praeger Publishers.

Cullen, F. T. & Wright, J. P. 2002. Criminal justice in

the lives of American adolescents: choosing the

future, Dlm. The Changing Adolescent Experience:

Societal Trends and the Transition to Adulthood,

disunting oleh Mortimer, J. T. & Larson, R., 94.

United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, N. J. 1999. Youth Crisis Growing Up in the High-

Risk Society. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

Delgado, M. 2001. Where Are All the Young Men

and Women Of Color?: Capacity Enhancement

Practice in the Criminal Justice System. New

York: Columbia University.

Dignan, J. 2005. Understanding Victims and Restorative

Justice. England: Open University Press.

Duffy, M. 2004. Introduction: a global overview of the

issues of and responses to teen gangs. Dlm. Teen

Gangs: a Global View, disunting oleh Duffy, M.

P. & Gillig, S. E., 1-12. Westport CT: Greenwood

Press.

Fagan, J. 1991. Community-based treatment for

mentally disordered juvenile offenders. Journal of

Clinical Child Psychology 20(1): 45.

Feld, B. C. 1999. Bad Kids: Race and The

Transformation of the Juvenile Court. New York:

Oxford University Press.

Geraghty, T. F. 1997. Justice for children: how do we get

there. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

(1): 190.

Harley, D. A. 1996. Vocational rehabilitation services

for an offender population. The Journal of

Rehabilitation 62(2): 45.

Heckel, R. V. & Shumaker, D. M. 2001. Children Who

Murder: A Psychological Perspective. Westport

CT: Praeger.

Hirschel, J. D. & Wakefield, W. 1995. Criminal justice

in England and the United States. Westport CT:

Praeger Publishers.

Hoge, R. D., Guerra, N. & Boxer, P. 2008. Treating

The Juvenile Offender. United States of America:

Guilford Press.

Horowitz, M. A. 2000. Kids who kill: a critique of how

the American legal system deals with juveniles

who commit homicide. Law and Contemporary

Problems 63(3): 133.

Hudson, B. 2003. Understanding Justice: an

Introduction to Ideas, Perspectives and

Controversies In Modern Penal Theory. Edisi Ke-

Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Jackson, M. 2003. Criminal Law in Hong Kong. Hong

Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Kanun Acara Jenayah (Semakan 1999)(Akta 593).

Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan

Masyarakat, 2009, Perkhidmatan Perintah

Khidmat Masyarakat, (atas talian) http://www.

jkm.gov.my/index.php?option=com_content&v

iew=article&id=72&Itemid=80〈=ms, [26

Disember 2011].

Maloney, D. 2007. Restorative community service:

earning redemption, gaining skills, and proving

worth. Reclaiming Children and Youth 15(4): 214-

Mann, C. R. 1984. Female Crime and Delinquency.

United States of America: University of Alabama

Press.

May, T. 1991. Probation: Politics, Policy, and Practice.

Philadelphia: Open University Press.

McLaughlin, E. & Muncie, J. 2006. The SAGE

Dictionary of Criminology. London: SAGE.

Miethe, T. D. & Hong Lu. 2005. Punishment: A

Comparative Historical Perspective. United

Kingdom: Cambridge Univerisity Press.

Moeller, T. G. 2001. Youth Aggression and Violence:

a Psychological Approach. United States of

America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Mohd. Al-Adib Samuri & Noor Aziah Mohd Awal.

Hukuman terhadap pesalah kanak-kanak

di Malaysia: pencegahan atau pemulihan? Jurnal

Undang-undang 13: 35-54.

Moore, L. V. 2003. Juvenile Crime: Current Issues

and Background. United States of America: Nova

Publishers.

Morris, N. & Rothman, D. J., sunt. 1995. The Oxford

History of the Prison: the Practice of Punishment

in Western Society. New York: Oxford University

Press.

Nolan, J. L. 2002. Drug Courts in Theory and in

Practice. United States of America: Aldine

Transaction.

Packer, H. L. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction.

California: Stanford University Press.

Pagnanelli, E. 2007. Children as adults: the transfer of

juveniles to adult courts and the potential impact

of Roper v Simmons. American Criminal Law

Review 44(1): 175.

Rauner, D. M. 2000. They Still Pick Me up When I Fall:

the Role of Caring on Youth Development and

Community Life. New York: Columbia University

Press.

Reamer, F. G. 2003. Criminal Lessons: Case Studies

and Commentary On Crime and Justice. New

York: Columbia University Press.

Jurnal Undang-undang & Masyarakat 16

Stark, J. H. & Goldstein, H. W. 1985. The Rights of

Crime Victims. Toronto: Bantam Books.

Stenberg, C. W. & Colman, W. G. 1994. A Health and

Education Policy Issues Handbook. Westport CT:

Greenwood Press.

Tak, P. J. 2001. Sentencing and Punishment in the

Netherlands. Dlm. Sentencing and Sanctions in

Western Countries, disunting oleh M. Tonry & R.

S. Frase, 168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tonry, M. sunt. 2001. Penal Reform in Overcrowded

Times. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tonry, M. 1996. Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford

University Press.

Walters, G. D. 1992. Foundations of Criminal Science.

New York: Praeger.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.