Enforcement Against Ponzi Scheme, The Fraudulent Method to Generate Easy Money in Malaysia

Siti Zalzaliza Binti Zulkhafri, Hasani Mohd Ali, Mohd Zamre Mohd Zahir, Muhamad Sayuti Hassan

Abstract


Ponzi schemes are a type of investment fraud that offers investors great rates of return with no risk. Although various measures have been taken by law enforcement agencies as well as financial regulators to prevent this kind of problem, many people are still deceived by this kind of scheme. In Malaysia, there is no specific law mentioning Ponzi scheme. However, relevant laws such as the Penal Code, Financial Services Act 2013 and Direct Sales and Anti–Pyramid Scheme Act 1993 are some applicable laws that can be used to combat the Ponzi scheme. Hence, this article aims to examine the enforcement measures in Malaysia concerning illicit investment schemes and recommend various methods used by the United States and Australia for comparative purposes. Preventive measures and existing regulations used by the United States and Australia are also highlighted to compare the effectiveness of current enforcement done by the authorities in Malaysia. Findings show that despite Malaysia having a few laws in place to tackle this fraudulent scam, they are far from perfect. Therefore, more comprehensive regulations and strategies regarding this scheme are needed since it would assist the relevant authorities in preventing similar fraud. In conclusion, the Malaysian government needs to adopt proper regulation, education, and enforcement to reduce or prevent the number of Ponzi scheme cases in Malaysia. If left unaddressed, the situation will worsen, negatively affecting investors, creditors, and the public.


Keywords


Ponzi scheme; illegal investment scheme; fraud; law enforcement; preventive measures

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aiman Nariman Mohd Sulaiman, Azza Isma Moideen & Sharon David Moreira. 2016. Of Ponzi schemes and investment scams: A case study of enforcement actions in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime 23(1): 231-243. https://doi. org/10.1108/JFC-05-2014-0021.

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cosic Holdings Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1579.

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Worldplay Services Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1138.

Capital Market and Services Act (CMSA) 2007 [Act 671].

Cohler, A. 2017. The Evolution and Impacts of the Ponzi Scheme & Governmental Oversight. Presented in Ramapo College Honor’s Symposium April 12, 2017.

Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. 2008. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Eley Suzana Kasim, Norlaila Md Zina, Hazlina Mohd Padil & Normah Omar. 2020. Ponzi scheme and its prevention: Insight from Malaysia. Management & Accounting Review (MAR) 19(3): 90. https://doi.org/10.24191/mar.v19i03-05.

Financial Consumer Alert Update. 2023. Bank Negara Malaysia. March 3. https://www.bnm.gov.my/documents/20124/761679/FCA_20190527_EN.pdf.

Financial Services Act 2013 [Act 758].

Juriah Abdul Jalil & Shukriah Mohd Sheriff. 2020. Legal tech in legal service: Challenging the traditional legal landscape in Malaysia. IIUM Law Journal 28(S1): 279–301. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v28i(S1).586.

Lewis Liew Teo Piaw, Hairulhana Binti Zawawi & Zunita Binti Bujang. 2019. Who are the money games investors? Case study in Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business (IJAFB) 4(25): 12-24.

Maryam Khalid & Sherin Kunhibava. 2020. Fintech regulatory sandboxes in Australia and Malaysia: A legal analysis.IIUM Law Journal 28(1): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v28i1.475.

Mohammad Azim & Md Saiful Azam. 2016. Bernard Madoff's ‘Ponzi Scheme’: Fraudulent behaviour and the role of auditors. Accountancy Business and the Public Interest 15: 122-137.

Muhammad Takiyuddin Abdul Ghani & Bahyah Abdul Halim. 2017. Pseudo-investment scheme in Malaysia: Issues and problems. Jurnal Sultan Alauddin Sulaiman Shah 4(1): 60-66.

Perry, Tamar et al. v. Esculier, Jacques Henri Georges et al [2023] SGCA (I) 2.

Public Prosecutor v. Raja Noor Asma bt Raja Harun [2013] 9 MLJ 181.

SC Obtains RM31 Million for Investors in Swisscash Settlement. Securities Commission Malaysia. November 13, 2009. https://www.sc.com.my/resources/media/media-release/sc-obtains-rm31-million-for-investors-in-swisscash-settlement.

SEC Enforcement Actions Against Ponzi Schemes. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2019. https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/enf-actions-ponzi.shtml.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Shavers et al, No. 4 2013 cv 00416 - Document 23 (E.D. Tex. 2013).

Sheila Ramalingam, Johan Shamsuddin Sabaruddin & Saroja Dhanapal. 2022. The language of justice in Malaysian courts: The law and the reality. IIUM Law Journal 30,(2): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30i2.758.

U.S Securities & Exchange Commission, 2013.

Zunaira Saieed. Malaysia’s Securities Commission Unveils InvestSmart Mobile App. The Star, June 20, 2014. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2014/06/20/sc-unveils-investsmart-mobile-app-it-wants-to-woo-younger-investors-and-sustain-growth-in-the-countr.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.