MENGURANGKAN JURANG DIGITAL MELALUI PROGRAM PENGATURCARAAN ROBOTIK BERKONSEPKAN PEMIKIRAN KOMPUTASIONAL UNTUK PELAJAR DAN GURU SEKOLAH LUAR BANDAR (Bridging the Digital Divide through Robotic Programming Program based on Computational Thinking among Students and Teachers in Rural Schools)

Nazrul Anuar Nayan, Umar Muslim Ahmad Kamal, Nor Asyikin Hasan Adali, Nur Athirah Zul

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Pendidikan dalam bidang Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan, Seni dan Matematik (STEAM) dan peningkatan kemahiran pemikiran komputasional (CT) merupakan faktor penting dalam mempercepatkan kemajuan dalam pelbagai sektor untuk mencapai Matlamat Pembangunan Mampan (SDG). Oleh itu, pelajar perlu didedahkan dengan kemahiran ini sebagai persediaan menghadapi cabaran masa hadapan bagi mengurangkan jurang digital dan ekonomi di antara kawasan, selaras dengan SDG 11, iaitu Bandar dan Komuniti Lestari. Jurang digital menyebabkan pelajar luar bandar terpinggir dan kehilangan minat dalam bidang STEAM, yang memburukkan lagi ketidaksamaan sosial dan ekonomi. Sekiranya program amali dan aktiviti STEAM dapat dijalankan secara berterusan, dengan lebih proaktif melibatkan lebih ramai peserta, ia akan meningkatkan minat dan kecenderungan pelajar luar bandar untuk menyambung pengajian dalam bidang ini. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur kemahiran menyelesaikan masalah menggunakan konsep pemikiran komputasional serta minat dan kecenderungan pelajar dalam STEAM selepas mengikuti kursus pengaturcaraan robotik, yang dijalankan di Sebuyau, Sarawak dengan kerjasama Yayasan Bank Rakyat. Seramai 116 orang pelajar dan 25 orang guru terlibat dalam program ini yang berlangsung selama 12 hari. Pelajar dan guru dibahagikan kepada tiga kumpulan, dan setiap kumpulan dilatih selama empat hari berturut-turut. Empat modul pengajaran yang digunakan ialah konsep CT, pengaturcaraan Scratch, pengoperasian mikropengawal Arduino dan pengaturcaraan robot mBot2. Di akhir program, pertandingan robotik diadakan untuk menggalakkan pembelajaran kompetitif. Hasil daripada keputusan ujian darjah kecerdasan pra dan pasca pelajar, terdapat peningkatan dalam purata sebanyak 9.72% dalam kemahiran penyelesaian masalah selepas program dilaksanakan. Selain itu, hasil tinjauan menunjukkan perubahan yang positif dalam kecenderungan pelajar untuk belajar dalam bidang STEAM selepas mengaplikasikan konsep pemikiran komputasional dalam pengaturcaraan. Pembelajaran kompetitif melalui pertandingan pula mendedahkan pelajar dengan persaingan yang bakal mereka tempuhi di alam pekerjaan. Kesimpulannya, program sebegini mampu memberi motivasi kepada pelajar dan seterusnya merapatkan jurang digital yang semakin ketara. Kemahiran heuristik yang dibangunkan membantu pelajar menjadi kreatif, analitikal, dan berfokus pada penyelesaian, memacu kemajuan dan mampu meningkatkan kualiti hidup masyarakat.

ABSTRACT

Education in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) and enhancing computational thinking (CT) skills are important factors in accelerating progress in various sectors to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Therefore, it is important for students to be exposed to these skills in preparation for future challenges as well as improving social and economic injustice in society, in line with SDG 11, which is Sustainable Cities and Communities. A significant digital divide leaves many students in rural areas marginalized and unable to learn and move forward. These limitations can cause them to lose interest in STEAM fields and exacerbate social and economic inequality. If hands-on programs and STEAM activities can be carried out continuously, proactively involving more participants, this may increase the interest and tendency of more rural students to continue their studies in the field. This research aims to measure problem-solving skills using the concept of computational thinking, as well as students’ interests and tendencies in STEAM after following a robotic programming course. The study was carried out in Sebuyau, Sarawak in collaboration with Yayasan Bank Rakyat. A total of 116 students and 25 teachers were involved in this program, which lasted for 12 days. The students and teachers were divided into three groups, and each group was trained for four consecutive days. The four teaching modules used are CT concepts, Scratch programming, Arduino microcontroller, and mBot2 robot programming. Then, a final competition held to encourage competitive learnings. As the result of the pre- and post-student psychometric test, there are 9.72% increase in mean value for problem-solving skills after applying the computational thinking module. In addition, the survey results indicated a positive change in the level of students’ inclination to learn in the STEAM field, after applying computational thinking in their programming. The competitive learning through robotic competition exposes students to the competition which they shall encounter in the future. In conclusion, such a program is able to motivate students and further bridge the digital gap that is becoming more and more apparent. The developed heuristic skills help students become creative, analytical, and solution-oriented, driving progress and improving the quality of life for everyone.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfayez, A. A. & Lambert, J. 2019. Exploring Saudi komputer science teachers’ conceptual mastery level of computational thinking skills. Computers in the Schools 36(3): 143-166.

Ardito, G., Czerkawski, B. & Scollins, L. 2020. Learning computational thinking together: Effects of gender differences in collaborative middle school robotics program. TechTrends 64(3): 373-387.

Atmatzidou, S. & Demetriadis, S. 2016. Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 75: 661-670.

Belay, D.G. 2020. COVID-19, Distance learning and educational inequality in rural Ethiopia. Pedagogical Research 5(4): 1- 11.

Bower, M., Lister, R., Mason, R., Highfield, K. & Wood, L. 2015. Teacher conceptions of computational thinking - implications for policy and practice. Australian Journal of Education 0(0): 1-16. Retrieved from https://www.google.co.uk/

Brackmann, C. P., Román-González, M., Robles, G., Moreno-León, J., Casali, A. & Barone, D. 2017. Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school. Dlm Proceedings of the 12th workshop on primary and secondary computing education, hlm. 65-72.

Chalmers, C. 2018. Robotics and computational thinking in primary school. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 17: 93-100.

Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X. & Eltoukhy, M. 2017. Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education 109: 162-175.

Chiazzese, G., Arrigo, M., Chifari, A., Lonati, V. & Tosto, C. 2019. Educational robotics in primary school: Measuring the development of computational thinking skills with the bebras tasks. Informatics 6(4): 43.

del Olmo-Muñoz, J., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R. & González-Calero, J. A. 2020.

Computational thinking through unplugged activities in early years of primary education. Computers & Education 150(103832): 1-19.

DOSM 2019. ICT use and access by individuals and households survey report: 2019. https://newss.statistics.gov.my/newss-portalx/ep/epFreeDownload Content Search.seam?cid=15517. 14 March 2022.

Durak, H. Y., Yilmaz, F. G. K. & Bartin, R. Y. 2019. Computational thinking, programming self-efficacy, problem solving and experiences in the programming process conducted with robotic activities. Contemporary Educational Technology 10(2): 173–197.

Fanchamps, N. L., Slangen, L., Hennissen, P. & Specht, M. 2021. The influence of SRA programming on algorithmic thinking and self-efficacy using Lego robotics in two types of instruction. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 31: 203-222.

Farah, J.C., Moro, A., Bergram, K., Purohit, A.K., Gillet, D. & Holzer, A. 2020. Bringing computational thinking to non-STEM undergraduates through an integrated notebook application. In 15th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (No. CONF).

Fessakis, G. & Prantsoudi, S. 2019. Computer science teachers’ perceptions, beliefs and attitudes on computational thinking in Greece. Informatics in Education 18(2): 227-258.

Günbatar, M. S. 2020. Computational thinking skills, programming self efficacies and programming attitudes of the students. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools 4(2): 24-35.

Hadi, M.E. & Atiqoh, K.S.N. 2021. Improving Students’ Mathematical Computational Thinking Using Scratch Program through Project Based Learning: A Development Research during Pandemic Covid-19. Dlm. 2021 9th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) IEEE. Hlm. 1-5.

Ioannou, A. & Makridou, E. 2018. Exploring the potentials of educational robotics in the development of computational thinking: A summary of current research and practical proposal for future work. Education and Information Technologies 23: 2531-2544.

Jackman, D., Konkin, J., Yonge, O., Myrick, F. & Cockell, J. 2020. Crisis and continuity: Rural health care students respond to the COVID-19 outbreak. Nurse Education in Practice 48: 102892.

Kaden, U., 2020. COVID-19 school closure-related changes to the professional life of a K–12 teachers. Education Sciences 10(6): 165.

Kim, S. W., Park, H. & Lee, Y. 2019. Development of project-based robot education program for enhancing interest toward robots and computational thinking of elementary school students. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information 24(1): 247-255.

Kucuk, S. & Sisman, B. 2020. Students’ attitudes towards robotics and STEM: Differences based on gender and robotics experience. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 23(100167): 1-8.

Ling, U. L., Saibin, T. C., Naharu, N., Labadin, J. & Aziz, N. A. 2018. An evaluation tool to measure computational thinking skills: Pilot investigation. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 1, 606-614.

Merino-Armero, J. M., González-Calero, J. A., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R. & Villena-Taranilla, R. 2018. Computational thinking initiation. An experience with robots in primary education. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 1(2): 181-206.

Noh, J. & Lee, J. 2020. Effects of robotics programming on the computational thinking and creativity of elementary school students. Educational Technology Research and Development 68: 463-484.

OECD. 2019. Malaysia- Country Note- Pisa 2018 Result. Oecd I–III: 1-10.

Pou, A. V., Canaleta, X. & Fonseca, D. 2022. Computational thinking and

educational robotics integrated into project-based learning. Sensors 22(10): 3746.

Qu, J. R. & Fok, P. K. 2022. Cultivating students’ computational thinking through student–robot interactions in robotics education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 32: 1983-2002.

Rosali, D.F. & Suryadi, D. 2021. An analysis of students’ computational thinking skills on the number patterns lesson during the Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA 11(2).

Setiawan, B. & Iasha, V. 2020. Covid-19 pandemic: The influence of full-online learning for elementary school in rural areas. JPsd (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) 6(2): 114-123.

Sezer, H.B. & Namukasa, I.K. 2021. Real-world problems through computational thinking tools and concepts: The case of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning.

Tadesse, S. & Muluye, W. 2020. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on education system in developing countries: a review. Open Journal of Social Sciences 8(10): 159-170.

Threekunprapa, A. & Yasri, P. 2020b. Patterns of computational thinking

development while solving unplugged coding activities coupled with the 3s approach for self-directed learning. European Journal of Educational Research 9(3): 1025– 1045.

Tkachuk, V., Yechkalo, Y., Semerikov, S., Kislova, M. & Hladyr, Y. 2020. Using mobile ict for online learning during covid-19 lockdown. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications. Hlm. 46-67: Springer, Cham.

Tonbuloğlu, B. & Tonbuloğlu, İ. 2019. The effect of unplugged coding activities on computational thinking skills of middle school students. Informatics in Education, 18(2): 403-426.

Tremmel, P., Myers, R., Brunow, D.A. & Hott, B.L. 2020. Educating students with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from Commerce Independent School District. Rural Special Education Quarterly 39(4): 201-210.

Tsai, M. J., Liang, J. C. & Hsu, C. Y. 2020. The computational thinking scale for computer literacy education. Journal of Educational Computing Research 59(4): 579-602.

Witherspoon, E. B., Higashi, R. M., Schunn, C. D., Baehr, E. C. & Shoop, R. 2017.

Developing computational thinking through a virtual robotics programming curriculum. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 18(1): 1-20.

Witherspoon, E. B., Schunn, C. D., Higashi, R. M. & Shoop, R. 2018. Attending to structural programming features predicts differences in learning and motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 34(2): 115-128.

World Economic Forum. 2020. The Future of Jobs Report 2020. Research Report. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/.

Wu, S. Y. & Su, Y. S. 2021. Visual programming environments and computational thinking performance of fifth-and sixth-grade students. Journal of Educational Computing Research 59(6): 1075-1092.

Yang, K., Liu, X. & Chen, G. 2020. The influence of robots on students’ computational thinking: A literature review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 10(8): 627-631.

Zainol, S.S., Hussin, S.M., Othman, M.S. & Zahari, N.H.M. 2021. Challenges of online learning faced by the B40 income parents in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy 3(2): 45-52.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JH-2023-1501-02

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


  ISSN: 1985-6830

eISSN: 2550-2271

JURNAL HADHARI: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Institut Islam Hadhari
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi
Selangor, MALAYSIA.


Phone: +603-8921 7187/7176/6994
Fax: +603-8921 6990
Email: jhadhari@ukm.edu.my

Web: ejournals.ukm.my/jhadhari