Chemical Safety in School Laboratories Located In Urban and Rural Areas: A Case Study in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia (Keselamatan Makmal Kimia Sekolah di Bandar dan Luar Bandar: Satu Kajian Kes di Cameron Highlands, Malaysia)

NUR LIYANA ALI, GOH CHOO TA, SHARIFAH ZARINA SYED ZAKARIA, MAZLIN MOKHTAR, SHARINA ABDUL HALIM

Abstract


ABSTRACT: School laboratory is one of the important facilities in enhancing teaching and learning particularly for science related subjects. Once students learned about science theories in the classroom, they can apply what they have learned by setting up relevant experiment in the school laboratories. However, potential risks occur in the laboratories, especially when dealing with chemicals. As this is unavoidable, hence, safety measures such as good ventilation system, personal protective equipment, emergency response plans are in place to safeguard the users and the environment. Nonetheless, existing safety measures in schools might vary among each other. A project was embarked to investigate if there have differences between secondary schools located in urban and rural areas, particularly on existing safety measures in laboratories, practices and awareness of students. This paper presents the preliminary findings of three aspects in chemical safety: level of knowledge, level of practices and level of perspective among the students in urban and rural areas in Pahang. The findings indicated that there were no differences between the levels of students’ knowledge, practices and perspective of chemical safety in school laboratories. Majority of the students had average level of knowledge and practices of chemical safety. The study also revealed that they not so sure about the safety aspects in school laboratory. The findings from this study provide basic information for teaching and learning to enhance the knowledge and practice of chemical safety in school laboratories by taking considerations from students’ perspective.

Keywords: Chemical safety; school laboratories; knowledge; practices; perspectives

 

ABSTRAK: Makmal sekolah adalah salah satu kemudahan penting dalam meningkatkan pengajaran dan pembelajaran terutamanya untuk mata pelajaran berkaitan sains. Apabila pelajar mempelajari teori sains di dalam bilik darjah, mereka boleh menggunakan apa yang telah mereka pelajari dengan membuat eksperimen yang relevan di makmal sekolah. Walau bagaimanapun, terdapat risiko yang berpotensi akan berlaku di dalam makmal, terutamanya apabila berurusan dengan bahan kimia. Memandangkan terdapat resiko yang tidak dapat dielakkan, dengan itu, langkah-langkah keselamatan seperti sistem pengalihudaraan yang baik, peralatan perlindungan peribadi, pelan tindak balas kecemasan disediakan untuk melindungi pengguna dan alam sekitar. Walau bagaimanapun, langkah keselamatan yang ada di sekolah mungkin berbeza antara satu sama lain. Satu kajian telah dibuat untuk menyiasat jika terdapat perbezaan di antara sekolah menengah yang terletak di kawasan bandar dan luar bandar, terutamanya mengenai langkah-langkah keselamatan yang sedia ada dalam makmal seperti amalan dan kesedaran pelajar. Makalah ini membentangkan penemuan awal tiga aspek dalam keselamatan kimia: tahap pengetahuan, tahap amalan dan tahap perspektif di kalangan pelajar di bandar dan luar bandar di Pahang. Penemuan menunjukkan bahawa tiada perbezaan antara tahap pengetahuan pelajar, amalan dan perspektif keselamatan kimia di makmal sekolah. Kebanyakan pelajar mempunyai tahap pengetahuan dan amalan keselamatan kimia yang tinggi. Kajian itu juga mendedahkan bahawa mereka tidak begitu yakin mengenai aspek keselamatan di makmal sekolah. Penemuan dari kajian ini memberikan maklumat asas untuk pengajaran dan pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan dan amalan keselamatan kimia di makmal sekolah dengan mengambil pertimbangan dari perspektif pelajar.

Kata kunci: Keselamatan kimia; makmal sekolah; pengetahuan; amalan; perspektif


Full Text:

PDF

References


Carder, B. & Ragan, P.W. 2003. A Survey-based system for safety measurement and improvement. Journal of Safety Research 34: 157-165.

Eguana, M.T., Suico, M.L.S. & Lim P.J.Y. 2011. Learning to be safe: Chemical laboratory management in a developing country. Journal of Chemical Health & Safety 18(6): 5-7.

Herrington, D.G. & Nakhleh, M.B. 2003. What Defines Effective Chemistry Laboratory Instruction? Teaching Assistant and Student Perspectives. Journal of Chemical Education 80(10): 1197-1205.

Leggett, D.J. 2012. Lab-HIRA: Hazard identification and risk analysis for the chemical research laboratory. Part 2. Risk analysis of laboratory operations. Journal of Chemical Health & Safety 19(5): 25-36.

Noorden, R. V. 2011. A death in the lab. Nature 472: 270-271.

Nurzatulshima Kamarudin & Lilia Halim. 2011. Konsep Pengurusan Alatan dan Bahan Untuk Pembelajaran Sains di Makmal. Jurnal Teknologi 60: 65-70.

Petersen, D. 2005. Safety Improvement: Perception surveys can reveal strengths & weaknesses. Professional Safety: 45-48.

Ritch, D. & Rank, J. 2001. Laboratory Safety in the Biology Lab. Journal of Bioscene 27(3): 17-22.

Sarquis, M. 2003. Building student safety habits: Barriers and recommendations. Journal of Chemical Health & Safety 10(2): 10-12.

Tsung, C.W., Chi, W.L. & Mu, C.L. 2007. Safety climate in university and college laboratories: Impact of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Safety Research 38: 91-102.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 


ISSN 2289-1706 | e-ISSN : 2289-4268 

Institut Alam dan Tamadun Melayu (ATMA)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan
MALAYSIA

© Copyright UKM Press, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia