Discursively Positioning Women as Protected Objects in the Turkish Parliament: A Corpus-Assisted Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis

CEM ERDEM

Abstract


Benevolent sexism is well established as an attitudinal construct, yet its discursive operation in conservative non-Western legislatures remains underexamined. Addressing this gap, the study examines paternalistic and motherhood-based discourse in the Turkish Grand National Assembly, where women’s numerical presence has not necessarily translated into recognition as autonomous political actors. Using corpus-assisted feminist critical discourse analysis, it analyses 97 plenary speeches from the 28th legislative term (2023-2024), totalling approximately 156,000 words. The study identified 55 discourse segments containing 847 coded instances of paternalistic and motherhood-based representation. Protective paternalism, motherhood glorification, and sacred domesticity emerged as interlocking strategies. Together, they assign agency to men and the state while casting women as vulnerable dependents and defining them through care, sacrifice, and morally valued domestic roles. Crucially, the pattern recurs both within debates on women’s rights and violence against women and across policy domains without a formal gender focus. Apparently respectful language thus positions women as protected objects and constrains their political agency. The study extends Ambivalent Sexism Theory beyond attitudinal measurement by demonstrating how benevolent sexism is linguistically enacted and institutionally reproduced. Its corpus-assisted procedure offers a replicable means of tracing this process. The findings indicate that substantive gender equality requires attention to parliamentary language as well as women’s numerical representation.


Keywords: Parliamentary discourse; paternalism; motherhood-based discourse; benevolent sexism; Turkish politics 

 


Seksisme benevolen telah lama diiktiraf sebagai suatu konstruk sikap, namun pengoperasiannya secara wacana dalam badan perundangan konservatif bukan Barat masih kurang dikaji. Bagi menangani jurang ini, kajian ini meneliti wacana berasaskan paternalistik dan keibuan dalam Perhimpunan Agung Kebangsaan Turki (Turkish Grand National Assembly), yang mana peningkatan kehadiran wanita dari segi bilangan tidak semestinya diterjemahkan kepada pengiktirafan mereka sebagai aktor politik yang berautonomi. Dengan menggunakan analisis wacana kritis feminis berbantukan korpus, kajian ini menganalisis 97 ucapan dalam persidangan penuh sepanjang penggal perundangan ke-28 (2023–2024), yang merangkumi kira-kira 156,000 perkataan. Kajian ini mengenal pasti 55 segmen wacana yang mengandungi 847 contoh yang dikodkan sebagai representasi paternalistik dan berasaskan keibuan. Paternalisme perlindungan, pengagungan keibuan dan domestisiti yang disakralkan muncul sebagai strategi yang saling berkaitan. Secara bersama, strategi-strategi ini memberikan agensi kepada lelaki dan negara, manakala wanita digambarkan sebagai golongan yang rentan dan bergantung kepada pihak lain serta ditakrifkan melalui peranan penjagaan, pengorbanan dan peranan domestik yang dianggap bernilai dari segi moral. Yang penting, corak ini berulang bukan sahaja dalam perbahasan berkaitan hak wanita dan keganasan terhadap wanita, tetapi juga merentasi pelbagai bidang dasar yang tidak memberikan tumpuan khusus kepada isu gender. Bahasa yang kelihatan menghormati wanita sebenarnya meletakkan mereka sebagai objek yang perlu dilindungi dan seterusnya membataskan agensi politik mereka. Kajian ini memperluas Teori Seksisme Ambivalen (Ambivalent Sexism Theory) melangkaui pengukuran sikap dengan menunjukkan bagaimana seksisme benevolen direalisasikan melalui bahasa dan dihasilkan semula secara institusi. Prosedur berbantukan korpus yang digunakan menawarkan kaedah yang boleh diulang guna untuk menelusuri proses tersebut. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa kesaksamaan gender yang substantif memerlukan perhatian terhadap penggunaan bahasa dalam parlimen, di samping memastikan keterwakilan wanita dari segi bilangan.


Kata kunci: Wacana parlimen; paternalisme; wacana berasaskan keibuan; seksisme benevolen; politik Turki



Keywords


Parliamentary discourse; paternalism; motherhood-based discourse; benevolent sexism; Turkish politics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akser, M., & Baybars-Hawks, B. (2012). Media and democracy in Turkey: Toward a model of neoliberal media autocracy. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 5(3), 302-321. https://doi.org/10.1163/18739865-00503011

Alkhammash, R. (2020). Discursive representation of the EU in Brexit-related British media. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 20(1), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2001-05

Arat, Y. (1994). Toward a democratic society: The women's movement in Turkey in the 1980s. Women's Studies International Forum, 17(2-3), 241-248.

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962

Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270

Baxter, J. (2000). Teaching girls to speak out: An investigation of the extent to which gender is a pertinent discourse for describing and assessing girls' and boys' speech in public contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Reading, UK.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Budak, C., & Aldemir, C. (2025). Kamu politikası ve toplumsal cinsiyet eşit(siz)liği. In S. Berkün (Ed.), Toplumsal cinsiyet temelinde kadının konumu ve sorunları (ss. 21-50). Gaziantep: Özgür Yayın-Dağıtım. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub888

Anis Nadiah Che Abdul Rahman. (2024). The portrayal of women: A corpus analysis of the representation around the word 'Wanita' in the Malaysian Hansard Corpus. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 24(4), 150-169. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2024-2404-09

Childs, S. (2000). The new Labour women MPs in the 1997 British Parliament: Issues of recruitment and representation. Women's History Review, 9(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612020000200228

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.

Dahlerup, D. (1988). From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(4), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1988.tb00372.x

Dayang Sariah Abang Suhai, Kesumawati A. Bakar, & Norsimah Mat Awal. (2020). Modaliti dalam wacana perbahasan parlimen. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 20(4), 186-205. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2004-11

Edam, B. K., Aladdin, A., & Shaari, A. H. (2024). Discursive strategies unveiled: Exploring Arab and Western media narratives on Arab women. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 24(4), 173-195. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2024-2404-10

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Glapka, E. (2025). Unveiling agency: Investigating Muslim women's agency in hijab discourse through positioning analysis. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 25(3), 665-682. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2025-2503-05

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109

Hamad, S. S., Ali, A. M., Paramasivam, S., & Jabar, M. A. A. (2022). Complex speech act as a performance of fallacies in Nouri al-Maliki's political speeches. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(4), 186-206. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2204-11

Harshita Aini Haroon, Noor Asliza Abdul Rahim, Noriha Basir, & Zaliza Zubir. (2020). Lakuan ilokusi ucapan Zahid Hamidi dalam PAU 2017 dan 2018 [Illocutionary acts in Zahid Hamidi's PAU 2017 and 2018 speeches]. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 20(2), 96-114. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2002-06

Holmes, J. (1992). Women's talk in public contexts. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002001

Ilie, C. (2018). 'Behave yourself, woman!': Patterns of gender discrimination and sexist stereotyping in parliamentary interaction. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(5), 594-616.

Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Kandiyoti, D. (Ed.). (1991). Women, Islam and the state. London: Macmillan.

Lakoff, R. T. (1990). Talking Power: The Politics of Language. New York: Basic Books.

Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816

Norsimah Mat Awal, Kesumawati A. Bakar, Anis Nadiah Che Abdul Rahman, & Imran Ho Abdullah. (2021). Representasi Halal dan Haram dalam Wacana Parlimen Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(4), 186-207. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2104-10

Rich, A. (1976). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

Shaw, S. (2006). Governed by the rules? The female voice in parliamentary debates. In J. Baxter (Ed.), Speaking out: The female voice in public contexts (pp. 81-102). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Stopfner, M. (2018). Put your 'big girl' voice on: Parliamentary heckling against female MPs. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(5), 617-635.

Wang Can, Jaafar, M. F., & Anis Nadiah Che Abdul Rahman. (2025). News media representation of China's family planning policy in China Daily: A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 25(3), 602-621. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2025-2503-02.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2026-2603-06

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021