Discursive Enactment of Power In Iranian High School EFL Classrooms

Faiz Sathi Abdullah, Kobra Hosseini

Abstract


Teachers’ dominance in teaching environments has been criticized as an oppressive educational practice by critical theories of education. While critical pedagogy that espouses a problem-posing model of education has sought to promote a more equitable and dialogical teacher-student partnership and to transform the oppressive conditions of the ESL/EFL classroom, the claimed potential of the approach has had only limited success in practice. Drawing upon Fairclough’s approach to critical discourse analysis to make for a principled analysis of EFL classroom practice, this study investigated the discoursal features of unequal power relations in Iranian high school EFL classes. The data was collected via observation of two classrooms, one located in an urban area and the other in a semi-urban area of Iran. The analysis of the observation data, which included transcripts of classroom lessons as well as field notes, indicated that teachers played a disproportionately dominant role to the extent that the students were kept apparently passive and powerless via a range of discursive strategies including maximizing teacher-controlled talking time, turn-taking, topic control, modes of meaning-construction, and elicitation strategies. The findings of this study are expected to provide critical and emancipatory insights into ESL/EFL classroom practice and contribute to the transformation of its status quo. 


Keywords


power relations, classroom discourse, critical discourse analysis, EFL learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 9-32.

Bailey, J. J., & Cervero, M. R. (1998). Power dynamics in teaching and learning practices: an examination of two adult education classroom. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 17(6), 389-399.

Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1987). The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. The Hastings Law Journal, 38(July 1987), 805-853.

Briggs, C. (1992). Linguistic ideologies and the naturalization of power in Warao Discourse. Pragmatics, 2(3), 387-404.

Canagarajah, S. (2005). Critical Pedagogy in L2 learning and teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. ELT Journal, 52(3), 179-187.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change: Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 258-284). London: Sage.

Faiz Sathi Abdullah. (2008). Foreign languages in the New Wor(l)d Order: Whither linguistic symbiosis? In R. Jacobson (Ed.), The pulse of a Malaysian university: Ethno- and sociolinguistic issues and the TESOL dimension (pp. 77-97). New York: Peter Lang.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1. New York: Pantheon Books.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

Freire, P. (1973). The practice of freedom. London: Writers and Readers.

Freire, P. (1981). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word & the world. London: Routledge.

Giroux, H. A. (1988). Literacy and the pedagogy of voice and political empowerment. Educational Theory, 38(1), 61-75.

Giroux, H. A. (2004). Critical pedagogy and the postmodern/modern divide: Towards a pedagogy of democratization. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(1), 31-47.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. (Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith). New York: International Publishers.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.

Holliday, A. (1997). The politics of participation in international English language education. System, 25(3), 409-423.

Idris Aman, & Rosniah Mustafa. (2006). Classroom discourse of Malay language lesson: A critical analysis. Jurnal e-Bangi, 1(1), 2006.

Kiany, G., & Shayestefar, P. (2010). High school students’ perceptions of EFL teacher control orientations and their English academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 491-508.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1999). Critical Classroom Discourse Analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 453-484.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Levin, B. (2000). Putting students at the centre in education reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 155-172.

Long, M. H. & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions. In H. W. Seliger and M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268-285). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Luu, T. T., & Nguyen, T. K. N. (2010). Theoretical review on oral interaction in EFL classrooms. Studies in Literature and Language, 1(4), 29-48.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Normazidah Che Musa, Koo Yew Lie, & Hazita Azman. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), (Special Section, January 2012), 35-51.

Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis: Penguin English.

Pace, J. L., & Hemmings, A. (2007). Understanding authority in classrooms: A review of theory, ideology, and research. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 4-27.

Pennycook, A. (1990). Critical pedagogy and second language education. System, 18(3), 303-314.

Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Improvised lessons: Collaborative discussion in the constructivist classroom. Teaching Education, 15(2), 189-201.

Seedhouse, P. (1996). Classroom interaction: possibilities and impossibilities. ELT Journal, 50(1), 16-24.

Shor, I. (1996). When students have power: Negotiating authority in a critical pedagogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Shor, I. (2000). What is critical literacy? In I. Shor & C. Pari (Eds.), Critical literacy in action: Writing words, changing worlds (pp.1-15). Portsmouth, NH: Benynton/Cook.

Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tatar, S. (2005). Classroom participation by international students: The case of Turkish graduate students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9(4), 337-355.

Tuder, I. (1996). Learner-centeredness as language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95-120). London: Sage Publications.

Walsh, J. (2008). The critical role of discourse in education for democracy. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 6(2), 54-76.

Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3-23.

Watts, R. (2007). Whose Knowledge? Gender, education, science and history. History of Education, 36(3), 283-302.

Young, R. F. (2008). Language and interaction. London: Routledge.

Zarina Othman. (2010). The use of okay, right and yeah in academic lectures by native speaker lecturers: Their ‘anticipated’ and ‘real’ meanings. Discourse Studies, 12(5), 665-681.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021