Application of the Vignette Technique in a Qualitative Paradigm

Hazita Azman, Mahanita Mahadhir

Abstract


Vignettes are short depictions of typical scenarios intended to elicit responses that will reveal values, perceptions, impressions, and accepted social norms. This article describes how vignettes were developed and used in a qualitative linguistics anthropology study to elicit those responses as experienced by mixed-heritage individuals in attaining heritage legitimacy despite their inability to speak their heritage languages. The vignettes were administered during in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Eight participants were asked to reflect and respond to prompts which revolved around typical experiences where speakers were limited by their lack of heritage language proficiency. Based on the vignettes, the participants described how the speakers would linguistically strategize to compensate their limited abilities in using the heritage languages. At the same time, the cultural means through which speakers gain legitimacy within their own heritage groups were also identified.  Essentially the use of the vignettes facilitated in generating data that would have otherwise been challenging to elicit given the culturally sensitive as well as highly private nature of the phenomena under investigation. The application of vignettes provided a less intrusive and non-threatening way of obtaining perceptions, opinions, beliefs and attitudes based on responses or comments to stories depicting lived experiences of the participants that the researcher is otherwise not privy to as an observer. However, application of this data elicitation technique can prove challenging for the researcher. A critical analysis of the development, implementation and validity of vignettes as a research tool is extrapolated here within the setting of a heritage legitimacy study as an exemplar.

 


Keywords


qualitative research paradigm; vignettes; Linguistics Anthropology; heritage languages; mixed-heritage

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barter, C. & Renold, E. (1999). The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research. University of Surrey, Social Research Update 25.

Barter, C. & Renold, E. (2000) “I Want to Tell You a Story”: Exploring the Application of Vignettes in Qualitative Research with Children and Young People. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. Vol. 3, 23-307.

Baxter P. & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report. Vol. 13(4), 544-559.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: Sage.

Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2004). Language and Identity. In A. Duranti (Ed.). A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Carlson, B. E. (1996) Dating Violence: Student Beliefs about Consequences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Vol. 11, 3-18.

Cheek, J. & Jones. J. (2003). What nurses say they do and need: Implications for the educational preparation of nurses. Nurse Education Today. Vol. 23, 40-50.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Thousand Oaks, C.A: Sage Publications.

David, M. K. (2008). Language Choice of Urban Sino-Indians in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Vol. 24, 217-233. Retrieved 21 July 2017, from http://repository.um.edu.my/3955/1/sinoindians.pdf.

David, M. K. & Nambiar, M. K. (2002). Exogamous Marriages and Out-Migration: Language Shift of the Malayalees in Malaysia. In M.K. David (Ed.), Methodological Issues in Language Maintenance and Language

Shift Studies (pp. 125-134). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Evans, S. C., Roberts, M., Keeley, J., Blossom, J., Amaro, C., Garcia, A., Odarstough, C., Canter, K., Roble, R. & Reed, G. (2015). Vignette Methodologies for Studying Clinicians’ Decision-making: Validity, Utility, and Application in ICD-11 Field Studies. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. Vol. 15(2), 160-170.

Finch, J. (1987). The Vignette Technique in Survey Research. Sociology. Vol. 21, 115–14.

Gibson, S. (2010). Introducing the Data Set. In M. A. Forrester (Ed.) Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology: A Practical Guide. (pp. 121-134). Los Angeles: Sage.

Gould, D. (1996) Using Vignettes to Collect Data for Nursing Research Studies: How Validare the Findings? Journal of Clinical Nursing. Vol. 5, 207-212.

Gourlay, A., Mshana, G., Birdthistle, I., Bulugu, G., Zaba, B. & Urassa, M. (2014). Using Vignettes in Qualitative Research to Explore Barriers and Facilitating Factors: A Critical Analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, BioMed Central Ltd: 14-21.

Hall, C. (1997). Social Work as Narrative: Storytelling and Persuasion in Professional Text. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Harwood, J., Soliz, J. & Lin, M. C. (2006). Communication Accommodation Theory: An Inter-Group Approach to Family Relationships. In D.O. Braithwaite and L. A. Baxter (Eds.). Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 19-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hassan, E. (2006). Recall Bias can be a Threat to Retrospective and Prospective Research Designs. The Internet Journal of Epidemiology. Vol. 3(2).

Hazel, N. (1995). Elicitation Technique with Young People. Social Research Update 12. Department of Sociology, University of Surrey. Retrieved on 28 June 2017 from

http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU12.html

Hughes, R. (1998). Considering the Vignette Technique and its Application to a Study of Drug Injecting and HIV Risk and Safer Behaviour. Sociology of Health and Illness. Vol. 20, 381-400.

Hughes, R. & Huby, M. (2002). The Application of Vignettes in Social and Nursing Research. Journal of Advanced Nursing. Vol. 37(4), 6-382.

Jenkins, N, Bloor, M, Fischer, J, Berney, L. & Neale, J. (2010). Putting it in Context: The use of Vignettes in Qualitative Interviewing. Qualitative Research. Vol. 10(2), 175-198.

Khanna, N. (2004). The Role of Reflected Appraisals in Racial Identity: The Case of Multiracial Asians. Social Psychology Quarterly. Vol. 67(2), 115-131.

Khanna, N. & Johnson, C. (2010). Passing as Black: Racial Identity Work among Biracial Americans. Social Psychology Quarterly. Vol. 73(4), 380-397.

Kow, Y. C. K. (2003). Language Shift and Language Maintenance in Mixed-Marriages: A Case-Study of Malaysian-Chinese Family. International Journal of Sociology of Language. Vol. 161, 81-90.

Kugelman,W. (1992) ‘Social Work Ethics in the Practice Arena: A Qualitative Study. Social Work in Health Care. Vol. 17(4), 59-80.

Kurata, N. (2011). Foreign Language Learning and Use: Interaction in Informal Social Networks. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Landau, R. (1997). Ethical Judgement and Decision Making Orientation in Social Work. Issues in Social Work Education. Vol. 17(2), 67-81.

Lanza, E. & Svendsen, B. A. (2007). Tell Me Who Your Friends Are and I Might Be Able to Tell You What Language(S) You Speak: Social Network Analysis, Multilingualism and Identity. International Journal of Bilingualism. Vol. 11(3), 275-300.

Lee Su Kim, Lee King Siong & Azizah Yaacob. (2010). The English Language and its Impact on Identities of Multilingual Malaysian Undergraduates. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 10(1), 87-101.

Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Enquiry. Newbury Park, California: Sage.

Mahanita Mahathir. (2016). A Multiple Case Study on Mixed-Heritage Individuals Claiming Heritage Legitimacy with Limited Heritage Language Ability. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia.

Mahanita Mahathir, Nor Fariza Mohd Nor, & Hazita Azman. (2016). Vignettes: An Alternative Qualitative Method for Studying Mixed-Heritage Individuals with Limited Heritage Language Abilities, Qualitative Research Conference Proceedings (QRC) 24-26 May 2016, Penang, Malaysia: 34-40.

McKeganey, N., Abel, M., Taylor, A., Frischer, M., Goldberg, D., & Green, S. (1995). The Preparedness to Share Injecting Equipment: An Analysis Using Vignettes. Addiction. Vol. 90, 1253-1260.

O'Dell, L., Crafter, S., Abreu, G. de, & Cline, T. (2012). The Problem of Interpretation in Vignette Methodology in Research with Young People. Qualitative Research. Vol. 12(6), 702-714.

Pao, D. L., Wong, S. D. & Teuben-Row, S. (1997). Identity Formation for Mixed Heritage Adults and Implications for Educators. TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 31(3), 622-631.

Rahman, N. (1996). Caregivers’ Sensitivity to Conflict: The use of Vignette Methodology. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect. Vol. 8, 35-47.

Renn, K. A. (2008). Research on Biracial and Multiracial Identity Development: Overview and Synthesis. In K. A. Renn & P. Shang (Eds.), Biracial and Multiracial College Students: Theory, Research and Best Practices in Student Affairs (pp.13-21). New Directions for Student Services. No. 123. DOI:10.1002/ss.282.

Remedios, J. D. & Chasteen, A.L. (2013). Finally, someone who "Gets" me! Multiracial people value others' accuracy about their Race. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. Vol. 19, 453-460.

Renold, E. (2002). Using vignettes in qualitative research. Building Research Capacity, 3, 3-5. Retrieved on 11 November 2017 from http://www.tlrp.org/rcbn/capacity/Journal /issue3.pdf

Rockquemore, K. A. & Brunsma, D. L. (2002). Beyond Black: Biracial Identity in America. Sage Publiations.

Romaine, S. (2000). Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Romo, R. (2011) Between Black and Brown: Blaxican (Black-Mexican) Multiracial Identity in California. Journal of Black Studies. Vol. 42(3), 402-426.

Root, M. P. P. (2001). Factors Influencing the Variation in Racial and Ethnic Identity of Mixed-Heritage Persons of Asian Ancestry. In T. Williams-Leon and C.Nakashima (Eds.), The Sum of our Parts: Mixed-heritage Asian Americans (pp. 61–70). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The Ethnography of Communication. 3rd Ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

Shin, S. J. (2010). “What about Me? I’m not like Chinese but I’m not like American”: Heritage Language Learning and Identity of Mixed-Heritage Adults. Journal of Language, Identity and Education. Vol. 9, 203-219.

Soliz, J., Thorson, A. R. & Rittenour, C. E. (2009). Communicative Correlates of Satisfaction, Family Identity, and Group Salience in Multiracial/Ethnic Families. Journal of Marriage and Family. Vol. 71, 819-832.

Soo Ying How, Chan Swee Heng, Ain Nadzimah Abdullah. (2015) Language Vitality of Malaysian Languages and Its Relation to Identity. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 15(2), 119-136.

Spolsky, B. (2001). Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Veloski, J., Tai, S., Evans, A. S. & Nash, D. B. (2005) Clinical Vignette-Based Surveys: A Tool for Assessing Physician Practice Variation. American Journal of Medical Quality. Vol. 20, 151-157.

Wallace, K. R. (2001). Relative/Outsider: The Art and Politics of Identity among Mixed-Heritage Students. Westport: Ablex Publishing.

West, P. (1982). Reproducing Naturally Occurring Stories: Vignettes in Survey Research. MRC Medical Sociology Unit, Aberdeen Working Papers.

Wilks, T. (2004). The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research into Social Work Values Qualitative Social Work. Sage Publications London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi. Vol. 3(1), 78-87.

Wilson, J. & While, A. (1998) ‘Methodological Issues Surrounding the Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research’, Journal of Interprofessional Care . Vol. 12, 79-87.

Wilt, J. (2011). Normal Families Facing Unique Challenges: The Psychosocial Functioning of Multiracial Couples, Parents and Children. The New School Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 9(1), 34-41.

Yancey, G. & Lewis, Jr., R. (2009). Interracial Families: Current Concepts and Controversies. New York: Routledge.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1704-03

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021