Using Hedges as Relational Work by Arab EFL Students in Student-Supervisor Consultations

Wasan Khalid Ahmed, Marlyna Maros

Abstract


One of the challenges that Arab EFL male and female postgraduate students in the Malaysian universities have to anticipate is the consultation process with their supervisors regarding their academic projects. During the consultations, the students ask questions and respond to the supervisors’ comments and demands. To perform these academic tasks appropriately, these students need to modify their interactional patterns using various linguistic devices.  One of these is hedges, the linguistic politeness markers. Incorrect selection of these devices can be interpreted as inappropriate behaviour, which may affect the student-supervisor relationships. To avoid any breakdown in communication between the two parties and maintain effective consultations, a pragmatic knowledge of using hedges is necessary. Previous discourse analysis studies on the use of hedges have focused on the student-student interaction while student-supervisor academic consultations still need to be explored to understand how these learners perform in more formal academic settings. The current study, therefore, aimed to investigate how Arab EFL postgraduate students use hedges to express various types of politeness. It also aimed to find out whether the use of this device is gender specific. The data were collected by means of four one-to-one student-supervisor consultations and a pragmatic knowledge questionnaire. The findings showed that the students are familiar with hedges as they used a huge number of them. Also the female students used more hedges than male students.  However, the analysis of the questionnaire showed that the students were not fully aware of the pragmatic functions achieved by these devices.

 

DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1701-06

 


Keywords


Hedges; gender; relational work; EFL Arab students; academic consultations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aiezza, M. (2015). “We may face the risks” … “risks that could adversely affect our face.” A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Modality Markers In CSR Reports. Studies in Communication Sciences. 15(1), 68-76.

Al-Khateeb, S. M., I. (2009). The speech act of thanking as a compliment response as used by the Arab speakers of English a comparative intercultural study. Master thesis, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

Al-Quraishy, S. (2011) The Use of Hedging Devices in Scientific Research Papers by Iraqi EFL Learners. Journal of Al-Qadisiya University. 14(1-2), 7-22.

Al-Rousan, M. Y. & Awal, N. M. (2016). Compliment Responses among Male and Female Jordanian University Students. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 16(1), 19-34.

Alaoui, S. M. (2011). Politeness Principle: A Comparative Study of English and Moroccan Arabic Requests, Offers and Thanks. European Journal of Social Sciences. 20(1), 7-15.

Alward, A. S., Mooi, C. C. & Bidin, S. J. B. (2012). Hedges and Boosters in The Yemeni EFL Undergraduates’ Persuasive Essay: An Empirical Study. The Internet Journal of Language, Culture and Society. 34, 1-12.

Ansarin, A. A. & Bathaie, M. S. (2011). Hedging as an Index of Gender Realization in Research Articles in Applied Linguistics. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies. 3(2), 85-108.

Aziz, R. A., Chin, C. J. & Nordin, N. M. (2016). The Use of Interactional Metadiscourse in the Construction of Gender Identities among Malaysian ESL Learners. 3L: Language Linguistics Literature®, Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 22(1), 207-220.

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests And Apologies. Norwood, N. J. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Caffi, C. (2007). Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Channell, J. (1994). Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (4rd ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Dixon, J. & Foster, D. (1997). Gender and Hedging: From Sex Differences to Situated Practice. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 26(1), 89-107.

Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch & S. Schneider (Eds.). New Approaches to Hedging 1st ed. (pp. 15-34). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Hameed, W. Q. (2010). The Impact of Gender in Determining Politeness Strategy with Reference to Iraqi Students of English. Journal of the College of Arts. University of Basrah. 2(54),38-56.

Holmes, J. (1984). Modifying Illocutionary Force. Retrived Augest 17, 2014 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223139403_Modifying_illocutionary_force

Kuang, C. H., David, M. K. & Lau, S. K. (2013). Politeness of Front Counter Staff of Malaysian Private Hospitals. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 13(1), 5-23.

Lin, Y.L. (2013). Vague Language and Interpersonal Communication: An Analysis of Adolescent Intercultural Conversation. Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 1(2), 69-81.

Lin, C. Y. (2015). An exploratory Comparison of the Use of Modifiers by Native Speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese in Academic Lectures. Text & Talk. 35(1), 77-100.

Locher, M. & Watts, R. (2005). Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture. 1(1), 9-33.

Majeed, N. & Hamid, S. (2009). An Investigation of Iraqi English Foreign Language Learners Awareness of Hedging Devices in Academic Writing. Tikrit University Journal of Humanitie. 16(5), 22-49.

Mukheef, R. N. (2012). Investigating Knowledge and Use of Iraqi EFL University Learners of Hedging Devices. Journal of Babylon University. 20(3), 745-779.

Najeeb, Z. M. , Marlyna, M. & Nor, N. F. (2012). Politeness in E-Mails of Arab Students in Malaysia. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 12(1), 125-145.

Prince, E. F. , Frader, J. & Bosk, C. (1982). On Hedging in Physician-Physician Discourse. Linguistics and the Professions. 8, 83-97.

Sattar, A., Qusay, H. & Farnia, M. (2014). A Cross-Cultural Study of Request Speech Act: Iraqi And Malay Students. Applied Research on English Language. 3(2), 35-54.

Shengming, Y. (2009). The pragmatic development of hedging in EFL learners. Unpublished PhD thesis, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. (2nd ed.). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Tawalbeh, A. & Al-Oqaily, E. (2012). In-Directness and Politeness in American English And Saudi Arabic Requests: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Asian Social Scienc. 8(10), 85-98.

Umar, A. M. (2004). Request Strategies as Used by Advanced Arab Learners of English as A Foreign Language. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Educational & Social Sciences &

Humanities. 16(1), 42-87.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021