Teachers are the foundation of a good education system and they are catalytic to nation building. In recognition of this, the Indonesian government had, in 2012, introduced a master teacher scheme under its teacher development initiatives to help identify the role model for the teaching profession. Under the initiative, teachers were selected as master teachers based on their performance in class and the learning experience they provided to their students. This study is an attempt to provide an in-depth understanding of interaction strategies, focusing on interaction management and elicitation techniques, employed by vocational English master teachers and the effects on the students. By employing conversation analysis (CA), two master teachers were selected, observed, and video recorded during formal teaching hours. Interviews were also conducted with the students to triangulate the data. The data went through a-four step analysis. The results showed that, in terms of interaction management, the teachers shared common strategies namely topic selection, topic shift, and turn taking—allocation of turn and nomination of turn taker. In addition, body language or paralinguistic featured in their communication together with code switching in English and Bahasa Indonesia. In terms of elicitation techniques, the teachers nominated individual students and asked the entire class to answer a series of open-referential and close-display questions. Besides, they posed questions repeatedly, approached students when asking questions, and posed follow up questions. The student’s reception towards the strategies was positive as they were keen to actively participate when they were given questions and opportunity to speak. The implications of this study suggest that teachers should implement such interaction management and elicitation techniques to enhance students’ participation and create learning opportunities.

Keywords: master teachers; interaction strategies; interaction management; elicitation techniques; Indonesian vocational classrooms

Arikan, A., Taser, D. & Sarac-Suzer, H. (2008). The effective English language teacher from the perspectives of Turkish preparatory school students. Education and Science. Vol 33(150), 42-51.

Bire, Jos. (2007). Collonial occupations and Indonesian education, Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra FKIP Universitas Nusa Cendana Kupang. Vol 11(20).

Brosh, H. (1996). Perceived characteristics of the effective language teacher. Foreign Language Annals.Vol 29, 125-138.

Castejon, Juan L & Martinez, Maria A. (2001). The personal constructs of expert and novice teachers concerning the teacher function in Spanish educational reform. Learning and Instruction. Vol 11(2001), 113-131.

Chaudron, C & Richards, J. C. (1986). The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures. Applied Linguistics. Vol 7(2), 113-127.

Chiang, L-C. (2006). Voices from the language classroom: a descriptive study of interactive-decision making of an expert teacher. English Teaching & Learning. Vol 4(April), 23-45.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). CA: Thousand Oaks.

Curtis, B. & Curtis, C. (2013). Social research, a practice introduction. London: Sage Publications.

Di Grapello, E., Kruse, A. & Tandon, P. (2011). Skills for the labor market: trends in demands, gaps, and supply. Washington DC: World Bank.

Domizio, P. (2008). Giving a good lecture. Diagnostic Histopathology. Vol 14(6), 284-288.

Emanuelsson, J. & Sahlstorm, F. (2008). The price of participation in classroom interaction: teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Vol

(2), 205-223.

Exley, B. (2005). Learner characteristics of Asian’ EFL students: exceptions to the norm. In Young, Janelle, Eds. Proceedings Pleasure Passion Provocation. Joint National Conference AATE & ALEA 2005 (pp.1-16). Gold Coast Australia.

Griffiths, C. (2011). The traditional/communicative dichotomy. ELT Journal. Vol 65(3), 300-308.

Jacobs, J., Gregory. A. & Hoppey, D. (2009). Data literacy: understanding teachers’ data use in a context of accountability and response to intervention. Action in Teacher Education. Vol 31(3), 41-45.

Khmakhien, A. (2012). Demystifying Thai EFL learners' perceptual learning styles. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol 18(1), 61-74.

Knapp, M. & Hall, J. (2006). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Lauder, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: a review of key factors. Makara, Sosial Humaniora. Vol 12(1), 9-20.

Li L. & Walsh, S. (2011). Seeing is believing: looking at EFL teachers’ beliefs through classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse. Vol 2(1), 39-57.

Lie, A. (2007). Education policy and EFL curriculum in Indonesia: between the commitment to competence and the quest for high scores. TEFLIN Journal. Vol 18(1), 1-4.

Marcellino, M. (2008). English language teaching in Indonesia: a continuous challenge in education and cultural diversity. TEFLIN Journal. Vol 19(1), 57-69.

Mattarima, K. & Hamdan, A.R. (2011). The teaching constraints of English as a foreign language in Indonesia: the context of school based curriculum. Sosiohumanika. Vol 4(2), 287-300.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2012). Garis-garis besar program pembinan SMK tahun 2012. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Ministry of National Education. (2005). Rencana Pendidikan Nasional

Jangka Panjang 2005-2025. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education Republic of Indonesia.

Moskowitz, G. (1968). The effects of training foreign language teachers in interaction analysis. Foreign Language Annals. Vol 1(3), 218-235.

Noraini Ibrahim, Azliza Haniem, & Nambiar, RMK. (2013). What master teachers do: A case study of planning, facilitating, role modeling, and developing materials. International Education Studies. Vol 6(6), 86-94.

Pikkert, J. J. J. & Foster, L. (1996). Critical thinking skills among third year Indonesian English students. RELC Journal. Vol 27(2), 56-64.

Richards, Jack C. (2011). Competence and performance in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: a description and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rido, A., Noraini Ibrahim. & Nambiar, RMK. (2014). Investigating EFL master teachers’ classroom interaction strategies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol 118(2014), 420-424.

Savignon, J. S. (2007). Beyond communicative language teaching: What’s ahead?. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol 39, 207-220.

Schempp, P., Tan, S. & McCullick, B. (2002). The practices of expert teachers. Teaching and Learning. Vol 23(1), 99-106.

Singelis, T. (1994). Nonverbal communication in intercultural interactions. In R. Brislin & T. Yoshida (Eds.) Improving intercultural interactions (pp.268-294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stroud, R. (2013). The laughing EFL classroom: potential benefits and barriers. English Language Teaching. Vol 6(10), 72-85.

Suharti. (2013). Trends in education in Indonesia. In D. Suryadharma & G. Jones (Eds.). W. Education in Indonesia (pp. 15-52). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Tsui, A.B. M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: case studies in ESL teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. NewYork: Routledge.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: language in action. London: Routledge.

Wilhelm, K. H. & Pei, B. C. (2008). University teachers and students’ perceptions of ELT methodologies and their effectiveness. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies. Vol 8(2), 79-102.

Xuerong, F. (2012). Excellent English teachers’ classroom strategies: A case study of three college English teacher in China. Higher Education Social Sciences. Vol 2(1), 1-7.

Zulfikar, T. (2009). The making of Indonesian education: an overview on empowering Indonesian teachers. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol 2, 13-39.