This study employs a corpus-based method in analysing the noun and noun premodification in journal articles relevant to the field of International Business Management. Following the frequency-based tradition, the noun and noun premodification are identified and extracted by using the node-and-collocate approach. The corpus is divided into five sub-corpora for the purpose of analysing the noun collocations and noun premodification types in each section and between different sections in the journal articles, namely, Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results and Discussion sections. The findings show that general adjective is the most common noun premodifier, followed by noun premodifier in both the Introduction and Literature Review sections, whereas general adjective and noun premodifier are both commonly used as premodifiers for nouns in Methods and Results sections. Besides, the general adjective is the most dominant premodifier in Discussion section. The findings also indicate that ed-participial and ing-participial premodifiers are not commonly used in the relevant journal articles. With regard to the use of noun premodification types between different sections in journal articles, general adjective+noun collocation is more pervasive in Introduction, Literature Review and Discussion sections. On the other hand, noun+noun collocation is more commonly found in Methods and Results sections. Following Hoey’s Lexical Priming, the results show that priming occurs at grammatical level within the discourse. The noun collocations identified are compiled for the possible use in the English for Academic Purposes Course.

Keywords: corpus-based method; noun premodification; frequency-based; collocation; textual colligations

DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-09

Ackermann, K. & Chen, Yu-Hua. (2013). Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) - A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Vol. 12, 235-247.

Ang, L. H., Hajar Abdul Rahim, Tan, K. H., Khazriyati Salehuddin (2011). Collocations in Malaysian English learners’ writing: A corpus-based error analysis. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 17, 31-44.

Anthony, L. (2015). Antconc (3.4.1w). Japan: Waseda University.

Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2011). Asian business discourse(s). In Aritz, J. & Walker, R. C. (Eds.). Discourse Perspectives on Organizational Communication (pp. 59-79). Madison NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

Bargiela-Chiappini, F. & Zhang, Z. (2013). Business English. In Paltridge, B. & Starfield, S. (Eds.). The handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 193-211). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.

Biber, D. & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 26, 263-286.

Church, K. W. & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association, norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics. Vol. 16(1), 22-29.

Durrant, P. (2009). Investigating the viability of a collocation list for students of English for Academic Purposes. English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 28(3), 157-169.

Ellis, N. C. & Sinclair, S. G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol. 49A(1), 234-50.

Gledhill, C. J. (2000). Collocations in Science Writing. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.

Hadi Kashiha & Chan, S. H. (2014). Discourse functions in formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 14(2), 15-27.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Writing Science Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.

Hill, J. (2000). Revisiting priorities: From grammatical failure to collocational success. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching Collocations: Further Development in the Lexical Approach (pp. 47-69). London: Language Teaching Publications.

Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.

Howarth, P. (1998). The phraseology of learners’ academic writing. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 161-186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2008). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 18(1), 41–62.

Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2007). Is there an “academic vocabulary”? TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 41(2), 235-253.

Laufer, B. & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning. Vol. 61(2), 647-672.

Nickerson, C. (2010). The Englishes of business. In Kirkpatrick, A. (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 506-519). London: Routledge.

Paquot, M. & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 32, 130-149.

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191-226). London: Longman.

Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An academic formulas list (AFL). Applied Linguistics. Vol. 31, 487-512.

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and semantic profiles. On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language. Vol. 2(1), 23-55.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G. & Westbury, C. (2012). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning. Vol. 61(2), 569-613.

Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K. & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and nonnative speakers. Second Language Research. Vol. 27, 1-22.

Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.