Sentence Comprehension and Working Memory in Malay Adults

Yazmin Ahmad Rusli, James Montgomery


Studies on sentence comprehension have centered on understanding the intersection between language and cognition. The aim of the current study was to examine the association between complex sentence comprehension and working memory (WM) in Malay adults. We predicted that WM storage (as indexed by performance on a WM listening span task) would be invoked during the processing of complex Malay sentences (object relatives), but not simple sentences (subject-verb-object). Sixty adults participated in the study; 30 Malay- and 30 English native speakers. The experimental tasks were developed in both Malay and English versions for both groups respectively. Participants completed (i) two sets of sentence comprehension tasks (whereby comprehension was determined via selection of the agent of the sentence), and (ii) a conventional WM listening span task. Tasks were designed to be structurally similar in terms of length (within the language) and meaning (across both languages). Both groups performed significantly better on the comprehension of simple sentences as compared to complex sentences and obtained similar mean scores on the WM listening span task. For Malay comprehenders, WM storage did not significantly correlate with comprehension of simple sentences as well as complex sentences. The same correlation pattern was also revealed for the English comprehenders. Our predictions were partially borne out. Findings suggest that participants’ comprehension of complex sentences did not invite WM storage, as it would seem that both Malay and English participants were still able to comprehend these complex sentences without having to tax their WM capacity. Although we anticipated a relation, the absence of such an association is not entirely unexpected. Potential explanations are discussed in this article.


Sentence Comprehension; Object Relatives; Working Memory; Listening Span; Malay

Full Text:



Abu Bakar, N., Razak, R. A. & Lim, H. W. (2016). Pemerolehan klausa relative dalam kalangan kanak-kanak Melayu: Satu kajian awal. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 16, 145-165.

Adani, F., Van der Lely, H. K. J., Forgiarini, M. & Guasti, M. T. (2010). Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension

study with Italian children. Lingua. 120, 2148-66.

Andrews, G., Birney, D. & Halford, G. (2006). Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences.

Memory & Cognition. 34, 1325-1340.

Arosio, F., Guasti, M. & Stucchi, N. (2011). Disambiguating information and memory resources in children’s processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal

of Psycholinguistic Research. 40, 137-154.

Baddeley, A. (1999). Human memory: Theory and practice. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A. & Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study.

Cognition. 11, 245-299.

Belletti, A., Friedmann N., Brunato D. & Rizzi L. (2012). Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of

relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua. 122, 1053-69.

Booth, J., MacWhinney, B. & Harasaki, Y. (2000). Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development.

, 981-1003.

Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A. & Just, M. A. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and

aging. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1075-1122). San Diego: Academic Press.

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Conway, A., Kane, M., Bunting, M., Hambrick, D., Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s

guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 12, 769-786.

Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Cowan, N., Elliott, E., Saults, S., Morey, C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A. & Conway, A. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in

working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology. 51, 51, 42-100.

Dick, F., Wulfeck, B., Krupa-Kwiatkowski, M. & Bates, L. (2004). The development of complex sentence interpretation in typically developing children

compared with children with specific language impairment or early unilateral focal lesions. Developmental Science. 7, 360-377.

Engle, R., Tuholski, S., Laughlin, J. & Conway, A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 128, 309-331.

Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E. & Rohde, D. (2006). The nature of working memory in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific working

memory resources. Journal of Memory and Language. 54, 541-553.

Friedmann, N., Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua. 119, 67-88.

Friedman, N. & Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of

Child Language. 31, 661-681.

Garnsey, S., Tanenhaus, M. & Chapman, R. (1989). Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

, 51-60.

Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76.

Gordon, P., Hendrick, R. & Levine, W. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science. 13, 425-430.

Gordon, P., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,

Memory, and Cognition. 27, 1411-1423.

Gordon, P., Hendrick, R. & Johnson, M. (2004). Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language. 51, 97-114.

Hassan, A. (2002). Tatabahasa Bahasa Melayu: Morfologi dan Sintaksis untuk Guru dan Pelajar. Kuala Lumpur: Akademia.

Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H. & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental,

and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 21, 803-865.

Hestvik, A., Bradley, E. & Bradley, C. (2012). Working memory effects of gap-predictions in normal adults: An event-related potentials study. Journal of

Psycholinguistics. 41, 425-438.

Hestvik, A., Maxfield, N., Schwartz, R. & Shafter, V. (2007). Brain responses to filled gaps. Brain and Language. 100, 301-316.

Hornstein, N. & Nunes, J. (2002). On asymmetries between parasitic gap and across-the-board constructions. Syntax. 5, 26-54.

Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review. 99, 122-149.

Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A. & Keller, T. A. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: New frontiers of evidence and arguments. Psychological

Review, 103, 773-780.

Kane, M., Bleckley, M., Conway, A. & Engle, R. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology:

General. 130, 169-183.

Karim, N. S., Onn, F. M., Musa, H. & Mahmood, A. H. (1994). Tatabahasa Dewan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Kas, B. & Lukas, A. (2012). Processing relative clauses by Hungarian typically developing children. Language and Cognitive Processes. 27, 500-538.

Kayne, R. S. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 25. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Kimball (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition. 2, 15-47.

Kim, J. H. & Christianson, K. (2013). Sentence complexity and working memory effects in ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 42,


King, J. & Just, M. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language. 51, 97-114.

Knowles, G. & Zuraidah Mohd. Don. (2006). Word Class in Malay: A Corpus-Based Approach. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Leech, R., Aydelott, J., Symons, G., Carnevale, J. & Dick F. (2007). The development of sentence interpretation: Effects of perceptual, attentional, and

semantic interference. Developmental Science. 10, 794-813.

Lewis, R. (1996). A theory of grammatical but unacceptable embeddings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 25, 93-116.

Lewis, R., Vasishth, S. & Van Dyke, J. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

, 447-545.

McElree, B. (2000). Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 29, 111-123.

McElree, B., Foraker, S. & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that sub-serve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 48, 67-91.

Mertus, J. A. (2000). The Brown Lab Interactive Speech System [Computer software]. Providence, RI: Brown University. Retrieved from

Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G. C. & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation. California: Sage Publications.

Miller, G. & Isard, S. (1964). Free recall of self-embedded English sentences. Information and Control. 7, 292-303.

Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (2007). Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. New York: Cambridge University


Mohamed Salleh, R. T. A., Kawaguchi, S. & Di Biase, B. (2019). A case study on the acquisition of plurality in a bilingual Malay-English context-bound

child. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 19, 22-42.

Nagaraj, N. (2014). Explaining Listening Comprehension in Noise using Auditory Working Memory, Attention and Speech Tests. PhD Dissertation.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Ohio University, USA.

Pereltsvaig, A. (2012). Languages of the World: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Razak, R. A. (2014). Studies on the acquisition of morphology and syntax among Malay children in Malaysia: Issues, challenges and needs. In H.

Winskel & P. Padakannaya, (Ed) (2014). South and Southeast Asian Psycholinguistics (pp. 133-144). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Razak, R. A., Jin, L., Lim, H. W. & Aziz, M. A. (2016). Profiling Malay children’s syntactic development: A Malay-LARSP. In Fletcher, P., Ball, M. J. &

Crystal, D. (Ed) (2016). Profiling Grammar: More Languages of LARSP (pp. 135-169). Multilingual Matters/ Channel View Publications.

Riffle, T. & DiGiovanni, J. (2013). Assessing Listening Effort in Hearing Impaired Individuals using Cognitive Tasks in Various Background Noise.

Unpublished First-Year Project, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Ohio University, USA.

Roberts, L., Marinis, T., Felser, C. & Clahsen, H. (2007). Antecedent priming at trace positions in children’s sentence processing. Journal of

Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 175-188.

Rossion, B. & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Perception. 33, 217-236

Salehuddin, K., Winskel, H. & Maros, M. (2011). The pragmatic functions of numeral classifiers in modern Malay written corpus. GEMA Online® Journal

of Language Studies. 11, 137-153.

Salehuddin, K. & Winskel, H. (2012). Malay numeral classifier usage in caretaker-child talk. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 12, 89-104.

Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime User’s Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.

Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z. & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 136, 64-81.

Swinney, D., Zurif, E., Prather, P. & Love, T. (1996). Neurological distribution of processing operations underlying language comprehension. Journal of

Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 174-184.

Taube-Schiff, M. & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Linguistic attention control: Attention shifting governed by grammaticized elements of language. Journal of

Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 31, 508-519.

Unsworth, N. & Engle, R. (2008). Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: An individual differences investigation of focus

switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 34, 616-630.

Van Dyke, J. (2007). Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:

Learning. Memory and Cognition. 33, 407-430.

Van Dyke, J. & Lewis, R. (2003). Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from

misanalysed ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language. 49, 285-316.

Van Dyke, J. & McElree, B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 55, 157-166.

Van Dyke, J. & McElree, B. (2011). Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 65, 257-263.

Von Berger, E., Wulfeck, B., Bates, E. & Fink, N. (1996). Developmental changes in real-time sentence processing. First Language. 16, 193-222.

Vos, S. H. & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: The role of working memory. Cognitive Brain Research.

, 111-122.

Wee, L. H. A. (1996). Cognition in Grammar: The Problem of Verbal Prefixation in Malay. PhD Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of

California-Berkeley, USA.



  • There are currently no refbacks.




eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021