Persian Culinary Metaphors: A Cross-cultural Conceptualization

Zahra Khajeh, Imran- Ho-Abdullah

Abstract


Studies concerning the metaphorical use of language deal with metaphorical units from two particular perspectives: a mapping from one cognitive domain to another domain, and a grounding of the mapping as a reflection within image schema. The present study demonstrates the pervasiveness of culinary metaphors in Persian social and cultural interaction hypothesizing that related food metaphors may single out the unique status of eating/food in Persian culture and society. Investigating the metaphorical conceptualization of “THOUGHT AS FOOD”, TEMPERAMENT AS FOOD, and LUST AS FOOD within the MIND IS BODY concept is primarily based on the assumption that thought, human disposition, and sexual desires are in fact closely interrelated. Utilizing a particular conceptual metaphor model (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999; Ahrens, 2002)   the image schema and proposition schema of related food metaphors are investigated in order to analyze cultural variations across Persian and English. The researchers suggest that cultural cognition which is distributed across the minds in a cultural group plays a key role as the source of cross-cultural variations.


Keywords


mapping, cultural conceptualization, cultural cognition, image schema, proposition schema.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahrens, K. (2002). When love is not digested: Underlying reasons for source to target domain pairing in the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In YuChau, Hsiao (Ed.), Proceedings of the first cognitive linguistics conference (pp. 273-302). Taipei: Cheng-Chi University.

Allbritton, D.W. (1995). When metaphors function as schemas: some cognitive effects

of conceptual metaphor. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10 (1), 33- 46.

Ding, E. (2009). Metaphor and culture. Asian Social Science, 5 (1), 47-69.

Dirven, R., Frank, R. M., & Pütz, M. (2003). Cognitive models in language and thought: ideology, metaphors and meaning. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Emanatian, M. (1999). Congruence by degree: On the relationship between metaphor and cultural models. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 205-218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the brain–metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company

Hutchins, E. (1980). Culture and inference. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and

reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Imran Ho-Abdullah. (2011). Analisis kognitif semantik peribahasa Melayu bersumberkan Anjing (Canis Familiaris). GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 11 (1), 125-141.

Imran Ho-Abdullah & Ruzy Suliza Hashim. (2009). The metaphors of Malaysian social-political bloggers: A shared cognitive schema? European Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (3), 514-523.

Kovecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kovecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kovecses, Z. (2006). Language, mind and culture: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 39-74.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor

and thought. 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.

Liu, Di-lin. (2002). Metaphor, culture, and worldview: The case of American English and

the Chinese language. Lanham: University Press of America.

Maalej, Z. (2007). The embodiment of fear expressions in Tunisian Arabic: Theoretical

and practical implications. In F. Sharifian & G. B. Palmer (Eds.), Applied cultural linguistics: Second language teaching/learning and intercultural communication (pp. 87-104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Newman, J. (1997). Eating and drinking as Sources of Metaphor in English. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa, 6 (2), 213-231.

Quinn, N. (1991). The cultural basis of metaphor. In J. W. Fernandez. (Ed.), Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology (pp. 57-93). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Quinn, N. & Holland, D. (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Sharifan, F. (2003). On cultural conceptualization. Cognition and culture, 3 (3), 187-207.

Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualizations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Sharifan, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S. (2008). Culture and Language: Looking

for the Mind inside the Body. In F. Sharifian, Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S. (Eds.), Body, culture, and language: conceptualisations of heart and other internal body organs across languages and cultures (pp. 3- 23). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.

Su, L. I-W. (2002). What can metaphors tell us about culture? Language and Linguistics,

(3), 589-613.

Sweetser, E. (1999). Compositionality and blending: Semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. In T. Johnson & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: foundations, scope and methodology (pp. 129-162). Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York.

Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Understanding cultures through their key words. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021