Creators of Controversy: Problematic Content and Digital Emotional Intelligence in Indonesia’s 2024 Election

Taufiqur Rahman, Firly Annisa, Frizki Yulianti Nurnisya, Elita Putri Pradipta

Abstract


Various parties can easily produce, distribute, and consume information in today's digital era. Information circulates quickly without a verification process for its truthfulness. Digital literacy is the keyword for building civilized communication. This study aims to analyse the circulation of hoaxes, fake news, and hate speech among supporters of presidential and vice presidential candidates in the 2024 General Election in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach with critical discourse analysis (CDA) and virtual ethnography by analysing the text dimensions, social cognition, and social context of content on social media into an integrated analysis supported by big data analysis from various online media platforms. The study results illustrate a difference in the characteristics of hoaxes and hate speech in the 2024 general election and the 2019 election. The political polarization was not as sharp as in the previous elections. However, there were still many issues of hoaxes and hate speech circulated to discredit specific pairs of presidential and vice presidential candidates. The variety of media outlets that people can use to upload and spread content is increasing with the presence of new media such as TikTok. However, the enthusiasm and militancy to support one particular candidate pair tend to reduce the emotional intelligence of netizens in terms of empathy, self-management, and relationship management on social media.

 

Keywords: Hoax, election, content, emotional intelligence, digital.

 

https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2026-4203-04


Full Text:

PDF

References


Annas, F. B., Petranto, H. N., & Pramayoga, A. A. (2019). Opini publik dalam polarisasi politik di media sosial [Public opinion in political polarization on social media]. Jurnal PIKOM (Penelitian Komunikasi dan Pembangunan), 20(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/rmv3

Asa Akhrani, L., Herani, I., Asqori Pohan, I., & Afif Alhad, M. (2020). Kekacauan Pemilu 2019: Fenomena firehose of falsehood dalam relasi sikap terhadap HOAX dan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap Komisi Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Transformative, 6(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2020.006.01.1

Budiman, M. (2011). The middle class and morality politics in the envisioning of the nation in post-Suharto Indonesia. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 12(4), 482–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2011.603912

Duile, T., & Tamma, S. (2021). Political language and fake news: Some considerations from the 2019 election in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 49(143), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2021.1862496

Eismann, K. (2021). Diffusion and persistence of false rumors in social media networks: Implications of searchability on rumor self-correction on Twitter. Journal of Business Economics, 91(9), 1299–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-01022-9

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Grieve, J., & Woodfield, H. (2023). The language of fake news. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009349161

Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science, 363(6425), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706

Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 257–270). SAGE Publications.

Khalyubi, W., & Perdana, A. (2021). Electoral manipulation informationally on hoax production in 2019 presidential and vice presidential election in Indonesia. Journal of Government and Political Issues, 1(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.53341/jgpi.v1i2.17

Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206.

Lan, D. H., & Tung, T. M. (2024). Exploring fake news awareness and trust in the age of social media among university student TikTok users. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 2302216. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2302216

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/gh7f5s

Ma’ruf, F., Pattiasina, P. J., Setiawati, R., Camerling, B. C. F., & Tuasela, P. E. (2024). The influence of social media usage, internet access, and mobile device penetration on social interaction quality among adolescents in Indonesia. The Eastasouth Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 1(3), 106–119. https://doi.org/rmv4

Machin, D. (2002). Ethnographic research for media studies. Arnold.

Park, Y. (2019). DQ global standards report 2019: Common framework for digital literacy, skills and readiness. DQ Institute.

Sosiawan, E. A., & Wibowo, R. (2020). Kontestasi berita hoax Pemilu Presiden tahun 2019 di media daring dan media sosial. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 17(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v17i2.3695

Sumartias, S., Pulubuhu, D. A. T., Elfitra, & Ratnasari, E. (2024). Portrait of hate speech propagators’ behaviour in Indonesia Twittersphere: A comparative virtual ethnography study. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4002-01

Shukri, S. (2023). Digital Authoritarianism and Religion in Malaysia. In I. Yilmaz (Ed.), Digital authoritarianism and its religious legitimization: The cases of Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and India (pp. 81–107). Springer. https://doi.org/rmv6

Tapsell, R. (2021). Social media and elections in Southeast Asia: The emergence of subversive, underground campaigning. Asian Studies Review, 45(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1841093

Tucker, J., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139

Tukina, & Sanjaya, M. (2020). Information hoax in political years 2019: Learning and challenges. KnE Social Sciences, 2020, 424–438. https://doi.org/rmv5

Utami, P. (2019). Hoax in modern politics. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 22(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.34614

van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120). SAGE Publications.

van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse studies and hermeneutics. Discourse Studies, 13(5), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611412762

Wardle, C. (2017, February 16). Fake news. It’s complicated. Medium. https://medium.com/1st-draft/fake-news-its-complicated-d0f773766c79

Wendratama, E., Aprilia, M. P., Sari, Y. A., Kurnia, N., & Utomo, W. P. (2023). Domesticating WhatsApp groups: Indonesian women’s experience with misinformation and hate speech in the 2019 election. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3904-20


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528