Determinants of Circular Economy Behavioural Intentions Among Malaysian Youth: Investigating The Roles of Structural, Socio-Psychological, and Communication Factors in the Digital Marketplace

Siti Haslina Hussin, Dayang Aizza Maisha Abang Ahmad, Ammar Redza Ahmad Rizal

Abstract


This study explores the influence of structural, socio-psychological, and communication factors on circular economy behavioural intentions among young adults in Malaysia. Employing a cross-sectional quantitative survey methodology, data were collected from 220 respondents aged 18-40. The findings reveal weak positive correlations between the examined factors and circular economy adoption intentions. Structural factors, which encompass cultural and relational aspects of social structure; socio-psychological factors, including attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived control; and communication factors, such as bi-directional communication and opinion seeking, all play a role in shaping young adults' intentions to engage in circular economy practices. However, the weak correlations indicate that a comprehensive approach targeting multiple factors may be necessary to effectively promote circular economy adoption. The study highlights the need for future research to explore the interplay between these factors and investigate potential moderators and mediators that may strengthen the relationship between the studied variables and circular economy behavioural intentions. The findings contribute to the understanding of the drivers behind circular economy behavioural intentions and provide valuable insights for policymakers and organisations aiming to foster sustainable practices among young adults in the digital marketplace. The study underscores the importance of adopting a holistic approach that addresses structural, socio-psychological, and communication factors to create an enabling environment for circular economy engagement.

 

Keywords: Circular economy, communication, youth, Malaysia, digital marketplace.

 

https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4003-11


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer. https://doi.org/dx4nv8

Bernardi, F., González, J. J., & Requena, M. (2006). The sociology of social structure. In C. D. Bryant & D. L. Peck (Eds.), 21st century sociology: A reference handbook (pp. 162-170). Sage Publications.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.

Coco Chin, K. K., Mahanta, J., & Nath, T. K. (2023). Knowledge, attitude, and practices toward plastic pollution among Malaysians: Implications for minimizing plastic use and pollution. Sustainability, 15(2), 1164.

Druck, A. B. (2018). Modern structural theory. In A. B. Druck, C. S. Ellman, N. Freedman, & A. Thaler (Eds.), A new freudian synthesis: Clinical process in the next generation (pp. 25-50). Routledge.

Economic Planning Unit. (2021). Twelfth Malaysia Plan, 2021-2025. Prime Minister's Department, Malaysia. https://rmke12.ekonomi.gov.my/en

Elder-Vass, D. (2010). The causal power of social structures: Emergence, structure and agency. Cambridge University Press.

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. https://www.greenpolicyplatform.org/research/towards-circular-economy-economic-and-business-rationale-accelerated-transition

Ettrich, F. (2017). The Marx-Weber debate: A sociological dialogue. Routledge.

European Commission. (2019). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52019DC0190

Foguesatto, C. R., Borges, J. A. R., & Machado, J. A. D. (2020). A review and some reflections on farmers' adoption of sustainable agricultural practices worldwide. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138831.

Fonseca, L. M., Domingues, J. P., Pereira, M. T., Martins, F. F., & Zimon, D. (2018). Assessment of circular economy within Portuguese organizations. Sustainability, 10(7), 2521. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072521

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

Gutmann, A. (2009). Identity in democracy. Princeton University Press.

Senard, J. D. (2016). The circular economy: Reconciling economic growth with the environment. Institut Montaigne. https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/publications/circular-economy-reconciling-economic-growth-environment

Jain, S., Singhal, S., Jain, N.K., & Bhaskar, K. (2020). Construction and demolition waste recycling: Investigating the role of theory of planned behaviour, institutional pressures and environmental consciousness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121405

Kalmykova, Y., Sadagopan, M., & Rosado, L. (2018). Circular economy – From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 190-201.

Kanchanapibul, M., Lacka, E., Wang, X., & Chan, H. K. (2014). An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 528-536.

Khan, F., Ahmed, W., & Najmi, A. (2019). Understanding consumers' behaviour intentions towards dealing with the plastic waste: Perspective of a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 142, 49-58. https://doi.org/gf8phk

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232.

Lakatos, E. S., Cioca, L. I., Dan, V., Ciomos, A. O., Crisan, O. A., & Barsan, G. (2018). Studies and investigation about the attitude towards sustainable production, consumption and waste generation in line with circular economy in Romania. Sustainability, 10(3), 865.

Martins, A., Mata, T. M., & Costa, C. A. (2020). Education for sustainability: A review of characteristics and trends of pedagogical approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 124079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124079

McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2008). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.

Mendoza, J. M. F., Gallego-Schmid, A., & Azapagic, A. (2019). Building a business case for implementation of a circular economy in higher education institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 553-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.045

Middleton, F. (2019). Reliability vs validity: What’s the difference? Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/reliability-vs-validity

Mohr, J. J., & Sohi, R. S. (1995). Communication flows in distribution channels: Impact on assessments of communication quality and satisfaction. Journal of retailing, 71(4), 393-415.

Prahinski, C., & Fan, Y. (2007). Supplier evaluations: The role of communication quality. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 43(3), 16-28.

Putnam, R. D. (2016). Our kids: The American dream in crisis. Simon and Schuster.

Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9).

Redza, A., Nordin, S. M., Shamsuri, S., & Wahab, H. (2014). Inter-organization communication management between organizations in a subsidized fertilizer market in Malaysia. UMK Procedia, 1, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.umkpro.2014.07.005

Schoop, M., Köhne, F., & Ostertag, K. (2010). Communication quality in business negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 193-209. https://doi.org/dsw2vj

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Senger, I., Borges, J. A. R., & Machado, J. A. D. (2017). Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the intention of small farmers in diversifying their agricultural production. Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 32-40. https://doi.org/ggr72d

Smol, M., Avdiushchenko, A., Kulczycka, J., & Nowaczek, A. (2018). Public awareness of circular economy in southern Poland: Case of the Malopolska region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1035-1045.

Tey, Y. S., & Brindal, M. (2022). A meta-analysis of factors driving the adoption of precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 23(2), 353-372.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

United Nations. (2017, December 11). World economic situation and prospects 2018. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-economic-situation-and-prospects-2018/

Velenturf, A. P., & Purnell, P. (2021). Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustainable production and consumption, 27, 1437-1457.

Veeck, A., Leingpibul, T., Xie, H., & Veeck, G. (2020). The role of personal factors in attitudes toward the adoption of new consumption behaviors in developing food systems. Appetite, 149, 104614.

Vidal, O., Goffé, B., & Arndt, N. (2013). Metals for a low-carbon society. Nature Geoscience, 6(11), 894-896.

Weimann, G. (1991). The influentials: Back to the concept of opinion leaders? Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(2), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1086/269257

Zeyen, A., Beckmann, M., & Wolters, S. (2016). Actor and institutional dynamics in the development of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 341-360.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528