Addressing Groupthink: Political Communication Strategies in the Indonesian Parliament Efficient and Impactful Policies
Abstract
This research emphasises the presence of symptoms of groupthink due to the perceived failure of judgements made under the Public Information Disclosure Act (PID) from the standpoint of civil society. The techniques employ instrumental case study inside the member group of Commission 1 of the Parliament of Indonesia. The findings demonstrated effective approaches to mitigate groupthink. The study utilises both primary and secondary data sources. Primary data refers to information that is obtained directly from the topic or thing being investigated. They serve as a research informant. The main source of information in this study was the official records of the meetings of Commission I of the House of Representatives from 2004 to 2009, where the discussion on the PID Bill took place. Furthermore, this study is supported by interviews conducted with carefully chosen informants who can provide evidence of the accuracy of the current meeting minutes or possess the necessary information required for this research. The chairman of the meeting in the commission I group is regarded as an adept moderator who can effectively handle and include all comments and criticisms from its members. The second tactic noticed involves conducting public hearing meetings to solicit expert opinions from academics, practitioners, and NGOs. The third tactic that emerges from the group dynamics during the discussion on defining public bodies is the involvement of certain group members who openly assume the position of devil's advocate.
Keywords: Groupthink, political group, communication, Indonesian parliament, Public Information Disclosure Act.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abatayo, A. Lou, Lynham, J., & Sherstyuk, K. (2020). Communication, expectations, and trust: An experiment with three media. Games, 11(4), 48. https://doi.org/p6h8
Abdel-Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Gamal, A., & Smarandache, F. (2018). A hybrid approach of neutrosophic sets and DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Design Automation for Embedded Systems, 22(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/gd6stp
Alfandari, R. (2019). Multi-professional work in child protection decision-making: An Israeli case study. Children and Youth Services Review, 98, 51–57. https://doi.org/p6h9
Banka, A. (2023). Dark money, US security guarantees and the twisting of allied arms. International Politics, 60, 1093-1112. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00434-y
Barber, N. W. (2019). Populist leaders and political parties. German Law Journal, 20(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.9
Bakar, H. A. (2017). Explaining cohesion linkages in workgroups: The cooperative communication: The cooperative communication in collectivism and high power distance workgroup context. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(3), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2017-3303-10
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., Drury, J., Dube, O., Ellemers, N., Finkel, E. J., Fowler, J. H., Gelfand, M., Han, S., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., … Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
Bhasin, S., Brito, J. P., Cunningham, G. R., Hayes, F. J., Hodis, H. N., Matsumoto, A. M., Snyder, P. J., Swerdloff, R. S., Wu, F. C., & Yialamas, M. A. (2018). Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: An endocrine society. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 103(5), 1715–1744. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00229
Bikbov, B., Purcell, C. A., Levey, A. S., Smith, M., Abdoli, A., Abebe, M., Adebayo, O. M., Afarideh, M., Agarwal, S. K., Agudelo-Botero, M., Ahmadian, E., Al-Aly, Z., Alipour, V., Almasi-Hashiani, A., Al-Raddadi, R. M., Alvis-Guzman, N., Amini, S., Andrei, T., Andrei, C. L., … Murray, C. J. L. (2020). Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet, 395(10225), 709–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Booker, C. (2018). Global Warming: A Case Study in Groupthink. London: The Global Warming Policy Foundation.
Bravington, A., Chen, H., Dyson, J., Jones, L., Dalgliesh, C., Bryan, A., Patnick, J., & Macleod, U. (2022). Translating qualitative data into intervention content using the Theoretical Domains Framework and stakeholder co-design: A worked example from a study of cervical screening attendance in older women. BMC Health Services Research, 22, 610. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07926-2
Bruns, A., & Nuernbergk, C. (2019). Political journalists and their social media audiences: New power relations. Media and Communication, 7(1), 198–212. https://doi.org/gh5rms
Chung, C. Y., Awad, N., & Hsiao, H. (2021). Collaborative programming problem-solving in augmented reality: Multimodal analysis of effectiveness and group collaboration. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 17–31. https://doi.org/p6jb
Cullerton, K., White, T., & Lee, A. (2019). Doctors rule: An analysis of health ministers’ diaries in Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132440
Dong, Y., Zha, Q., Zhang, H., Kou, G., Fujita, H., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges. Knowledge-Based Systems, 162(July), 3–13. https://doi.org/ggtjgx
Drugova, E. A., & Kalachikova, O. N. (2019). Bounded rationality, uncertainty, and complexity as decision-making contexts: A case of one university in Russia. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 8(4), 738–750. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2019.4.738
Forsyth, D. R. (2020). Group-Level resistance to health mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic: A groupthink approach. Group Dynamics, 24(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000132
Frank, A. K., O’Sullivan, P., Mills, L. M., Muller-Juge, V., & Hauer, K. E. (2019). Clerkship grading committees: The impact of group decision-making for clerkship grading. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(5), 669–676. https://doi.org/p6jc
Gergen, K. J. (2009). An Invitation to Social Construction (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Harel, M., Mossel, E., Strack, P., & Tamuz, O. (2021). Rational groupthink. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(1), 621-668.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Kartika, T., Syafrie, A., Utaridah, N., Noviera, F. R., & Abdurrahman. (2023). Communication and social interaction between Chinese and indigenous ethnics in Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(3), 515-529. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3903-28
Lau, R. R., Kleinberg, M. S., & Ditonto, T. M. (2018). Measuring voter decision strategies in political behavior and public opinion research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82, 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy004
Luo, D., Wan, X., Liu, J., & Tong, T. (2018). Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 27(6), 1785–1805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216669183
Lynøe, N., Juth, N., & Eriksson, A. (2019). From child protection to paradigm protection - The genesis, development, and defense of a scientific paradigm. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (United Kingdom), 44(3), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhy015
Mahadian, A. B., Hashim, R., & Mustafa, H. (2023). Articulating Islamist sectarian group antagonism memes on the Indonesian politics. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(3), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3903-07
McNair, B. (2017). An Introduction to Political Communication (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
Mnasri, S., & Papakonstantinidis, S. (2021). Detrivialization as a strategy to challenge organizational groupthink. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(3), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJKM.18.03.003
Osazevbaru, H. O. (2021). Conservative business strategy as moderator of board independence and corporate performance nexus in Nigerian financial companies. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 11(6), 46–456. https://doi.org/gj9jj2
Rasoulizadeh, G., & Khoeini, G. (2019). The solutions to enhance performance of parliamentary friendship group and its position in parliamentary diplomacy. Gênero & Direito, 8(7), 439–463. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n7.50044
Rawson, M. (2021). Communities of learning. Steiner Waldorf Pedagogy in Schools, 14(1), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429319679-4
Ruiz, A., & Guevara, J. (2020). Sustainable decision-making in road development: Analysis of road preservation policies. Sustainability, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030872
Sudaryati, E., & Kusuma, T. A. (2018). The impact of framing and groupthink to the career selection decision of accounting major students. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0011
Tilton, S. (2019). Winning through deception: A pedagogical case study on using social deception games to teach small group communication theory. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019834370
Turk, M. S., Avcı, Ö., & Baytimur, T. (2021). Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti’nde Sovyet Revizyonizmi’ne Karşı Kitapların Propaganda Amaçlı Kullanımı [The use of books against soviet revisionism for the purpose of propaganda in people’s Republic of China]. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 35(2), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.24146/tk.923450
Zebib, C. (2023). Political communication through the prism of social media: How are Lebanese political parties using Facebook in electoral campaigns? Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 38(2), 87-106. https://doi.org/m553
Zhang, P., White, J., Schmidt, D. C., Lenz, G., & Rosenbloom, S. T. (2018). FHIRChain: Applying Blockchain to Securely and Scalably Share Clinical Data. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 16, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2018.07.004
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528