Abdul Muein Abadi


This study centers on the following question: do the political, civil society organizations, and media infrastructure conditions exist for the emergence of ASEAN public spheres? The following definition of ASEAN public sphere have been constructed: a transnational site of deliberation in which civil society organizations reach an understanding about issues of common concern in ASEAN according to the norms of publicity. Patterns from three distinct structures that converged to form ASEAN public spheres has been identified. Firstly, the prime site of ASEAN’s governance consisting of the ASEAN Summit, ASEAN Community Councils, and ASEAN Secretariat has, to a certain extent, become open to the people’s input. Secondly, the emergence of transnational civil society and discursive publics in ASEAN. As a reservoir for the grassroot opinion- and will-formation, the civil society in ASEAN has been indispensable in terms of its norms of publicity and political efficacy. Thirdly, the cross borders communicative infrastructure has proven to be significant in terms of the grassroot formation fora as well as the mobilization of free and critical public opinion towards ASEAN across the region. They also challenge the “manipulative” and “manufactured consent” that tends to be propagated by the mainstream pro-political authority and pro-market media. Despite the prevailing supremacy of ASEAN’s political elites, as well as the interstate ICT cleavages in the region, I argue that a conducive milieu has developed in which ASEAN public spheres can indeed emerge.

Full Text:



Acharya, A. 2003. Democratisation and the prospects for participatory

regionalism in SoutheastAsia. Third World Quarterly, 24(2), 375-

Zakaria, Ahmad,. 2012. ASEAN Beyond 40. East Asia, 29(2), 157-166.

ASEAN Secretariat. 2009. ASEAN Charter. Jakarta.

ASEAN Secretariat. 2009. ASEAN economic community blueprint.


ASEAN Secretariat. 2009. ASEAN political-security community blueprint.


ASEAN Secretariat. 2009. ASEAN socio-cultural community blueprint.


ASEAN Secretariat. 2006. Report of the Eminent Persons Group on the

ASEAN Charter. Jakarta.

Benny, G., & Abdullah, K. 2011. Indonesian Perceptions and Attitudes towardthe ASEANCommunity. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs,

(1), 39-67.

Bohman, J. 1998. The Globalization of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and

Social Criticism 24(2/3): 199–216.

Bohman, J. 2007. Democracy across borders. Mit Press.

Brunkhorst, H. 2002. Globalising democracy without a state: Weak public, strong public, global constitutionalism. Millennium-Journal of

International Studies, 31(3), 675-690.

Caballero-Anthony, M. 2004. Non-state regional governance mechanism for economic security: the case of the ASEAN Peoples’ Assembly. The Pacific Review, 17(4), 567-585.

Calhoun, C. 1992. Habermas and the public sphere. The MIT Press.

Castells, M. 2008. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78-93.

Chalermpalanupap, T. 2008. Institutional reform: One charter, three

communities, many challenges. Hard choices: Security, democracy,

and regionalism in Southeast Asia, 91 -131.

Chandra, A. C. 2009. Civil society in search of an alternative regionalism in ASEAN. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Institut

international du développement durable.

Collins, A. 2008. A people-oriented ASEAN: a door ajar or closed for civil

society organizations?. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal

of International and Strategic Affairs, 30(2), 313-331.

Cox, R.W. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory in Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10(2): 126-155.

Crack, A. (2008). Global communication and transnational public spheres. Palgrave Macmillan.

Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

Dang, T. T. H. 2008. Examining the engagement between civil society in

Southeast Asia and ASEAN in the ASEAN Community building

process. GRIN Verlag.

Dosch, J. 2008. Sovereignty rules: Human security, civil society, and the limits of liberal reform. Hard choices: Security, democracy and regionalism in Southeast Asia, 59-90.

Emmerson, D. K. 2005. Security, Community, and Democracy in Southeast Asia: Analyzing ASEAN. Japanese Journal of Political Science,

(02), 165-185.

Emmerson, D. K. 2007. Challenging ASEAN: A” Topological” View.

Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs,29(3), 424-446.

Fraser, N. 2007. Transnationalizing the Public Sphere On the Legitimacy

and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World. Theory, Culture & Society. Vol. 24(4): 7 -30.

Gerard, K. 2014. ASEAN’s Engagement of Civil Society: Regulating Dissent. Palgrave Macmillan.

Goode, L. (2005). Jürgen Habermas: Democracy and the public sphere.

London: Pluto Pr.

Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1; T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. 1987. The theory of communicative action (Vol. 2; T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. 1991. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. The MIT Press.

Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Trans. by W. Rehg. Cambridge: Polity.

Habermas, J. 1998. The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory (p.155). C. Cronin, & P. De Greiff (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.

Habermas, J. 2001. Why Europe needs a constitution. New Left Review,

September/ October.

Habermas, J. 2001. The postnational constellation: political essays (p. 58). M.Pensky (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habermas, J. 2006. Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? the impact of normative theory on empirical research.Communication Theory, 16(4), 411-426.

Habermas, J. 2012. The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Polity.

Igarashi, S. 2011. The new regional order and transnational civil society in Southeast Asia: Focusing on alternative regionalism from below in the process of building the ASEAN community. World Political

Science Review, 7(1).

Janssens, F. 2012. The People VS ASEAN.

Khagram, S., Riker, J. V., & Sikkink, K. (Eds.). 2002. Restructuring world

politics: transnational social movements, networks and norms

(Vol. 14). University of Minnesota Press.

Koh, T. T. B., Manalo, R. G., & Woon, W. C. (Eds.). 2009. The making of the ASEAN Charter. World Scientific.

Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (Eds.). 2010. The making of a European

public sphere: Media discourse and political contention. Cambridge

University Press.

Kuhonta, E. M. 2006. Walking a tightrope: democracy versus sovereignty in ASEAN’s illiberal peace. The Pacific Review, 19(3), 337-358.

Moorthy, R., & Benny, G. 2012. Attitude towards Community Building in Association of Southeast Asian Nations: A Public Opinion Survey. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 557.

Moorthy, R., & Benny, G. 2013. Does public opinion count? Knowledge

and support for an ASEAN Community in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 13(3), 399- 423


Morada, N. M. 2007. APA and Track 2½ Diplomacy: The Role of the ASEAN People’s Assembly in Building an ASEAN Community. People’s

ASEAN and Governments’ ASEAN, 58-66.

Morada, N. M. 2008. ASEAN at 40: prospects for community building in

Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Review, 15(1), 36-55.

Narine, S. 2004. State sovereignty, political legitimacy and regional

institutionalism in the AsiaPacific. The Pacific Review, 17(3), 423-

Narine, S. 2009. ASEAN in the twenty-first century: a sceptical review.

Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 369-386.

Nesadurai, H. E. 2004. Globalisation, domestic politics and regionalism (Vol. 5). Routledge.

Nesadurai, H. E. 2004. Regional economic governance in Southeast Asia:

normalizing business actors, sidelining civil society groups?. In

Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA),

Montreal, Canada(pp. 17-20).

Nesadurai, H. E. 2009. ASEAN and regional governance after the Cold War: from regional order to regional community?. The Pacific Review,

(1), 91-118.

Nesadurai, H. E. 2012. ―The Asean People’s Forum (APF) As Authentic

Social Forum: Regional Civil Society Networking For an

Alternative Regionalism‖ in Beeson, M., & Stubbs, R. (Eds.). Routledge handbook of Asian regionalism. Routledge.

Quayle, L. 2012. Bridging the gap: an _English School perspective on

ASEAN and regional civil society. The Pacific Review, 25(2), 199- 222.

Quayle, L. 2013. Southeast Asia and the English School of International

Relations: A Region Theory Dialogue. Palgrave Macmillan.

Ramírez, M. 2008. AsiaDHRRA and ASEAN: A Case Study on the Process of Civil Society Engagement with Regional Intergovernmental Organizations. Asian Partnership for the Development of Human Resources in Rural Asia.

Azizuddin Sani, M., & Hara, A. E. 2013. ASEAN Paradigm Shift from a State to People-Oriented Organization: A Neo-Communitarian Perspective. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 14(03), 379-394.

Weatherbee, D. E. 2009. International relations in Southeast Asia: the struggle for autonomy. Rowman & Littlefield.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

JEBAT : Malaysian Journal of History, Politics & Strategic Studies, 
Center for Research in History, Politics and International Affairs,
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, 
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM, Bangi Selangor, Malaysia.

eISSN: 2180-02551

ISSN: 012-5644