Child Maintenance in Malaysia: Are the Amounts Sufficient?

Rokiah Kadir, Safiek Mokhlis, Junaidah Abd Karim, Fauziah Abu Hasan

Abstract


Typical child maintenance issues following divorces included custodial mothers not having maintenance orders, fathers not paying the amounts ordered, or the amounts ordered far too low to maintain the children at subsistent level despite the fathers affording to pay more. Insufficient amount of maintenance can affect children’s protection and upbringing. The determination of whether the amounts of maintenance ordered by courts were sufficient to maintain the children at subsistent level has not been extensively explored so far. This study aimed at answering this question by analysing, with specific focus on age categories of children, how much has been claimed in child maintenance and how much has been granted by the Syariah courts. The study also analysed maintenance orders in comparison with the typically most important factor in child maintenance cases, i.e., fathers’ incomes. Whilst existing research cases been more focused on only selected decisions, and largely reported only on the amounts granted in court orders, this study analysed all child maintenance cases, and adopted a descriptive, non-conventional method by profiling quantitative details of decisions, which is necessary since child maintenance amounts are decided on case-by-case basis, with judges exercising broad discretion. The findings showed that, over the 50-year period, amounts claimed by mothers and amounts ordered by the courts kept increasing, but, despite the increase, the amounts ordered so far were still small and insufficient based on the current cost of living. The finding may be of assistance to family law practitioners, judges, and parents seeking more thorough information on the assessment issue of child maintenance. The findings should also provide awareness to child poverty economic analysis in future, particularly for policy responses and implications.

 

Keywords: Child maintenance, child support, fathers’ salaries, maintenance assessment, minimum amount, sufficient amount


Keywords


Child maintenance, child support, fathers’ salaries, maintenance assessment, minimum amount, sufficient amount

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, B. (2015). Penentuan kriteria kifayah dan ma’ruf nafkah isteri dan anak di Malaysia (PhD dissertation). Retrieved from University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

Arahan Amalan No. 5 Tahun 2019. Garis Panduan Skala Pentaksiran Jumlah Nafkah Anak. Retrieved from http://kelantan.jksm.gov.my/jksn/downloadjksnk/52019.pdf

Department of Statistics Malaysia. Marriage and divorce statistics, Malaysia, 2020 [Press release] 30 November 2020. Retrieved from

https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/pdfPrev&id=QmZ1cE4xRFAvYWQ0R05hTk1rWm5KQT09

Elrod, L. H. (1990). The federalization of child support guidelines. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 6, 103–130.

Ibrahim, B. & Mohd. A. (2013). Hak anak terhadap nafkah dalam perundangan Islam: Sejauh manakah bapa bertanggungjawab menanggung nafkah anaknya. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 25(2), 255-272.

Islamic Family Law (Federal Territories) Act 1984 (Act 303).

Kadir, R., Abdullah, R., & Mokhlis, S. (2021). Understanding why mothers can lose child custody in Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 1-25.

Kadir, R., Mokhlis, S., Kahar, R. (2020). Visitation rights in practice. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 95-115.

Mohd Zin, N., Abdul Hak, N., Mohd, A., Abdul Malek, N., Ibrahim, N., Che Soh, R., Md Hashim, N. & Ibrahim, B. (2021). Islamic Family Law in Malaysia. (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Sweet and Maxwell Malaysia.

Nepomnyaschy, L. & Garfinkel, I. (2010). Child support enforcement and fathers’ contributions to their nonmarital children. Social Service Review, 84(3), 341-380.

Waiz, M. (2019). Inilah kos sebenar membesarkan seorang anak di Malaysia. Available at https://hellodoktor.com/kesihatan-mental/pengurusan-stress/kos-membesarkan-seorang-anak-di-malaysia/

Case law

Azizan Marzuki v. Maharum Abdullah (2005) 1 CLJ (Sya).

Azrina bt Omar v. Ghazali bin Sharudin (2011) 2 SHLR 61.

Azura bt Adna v. Mohd. Zulkefli b. Salleh (2001) 14 (2) JH 179–224.

Case No. 04100-022-0125-2008. Available at

https://www.mahsyariahmelaka.gov.my/judgement/files/MTS/Tuntutan_Ubah_Perintah_Nafkah_Anak_Isteri_Lain.pdf.

Case No. 04002-024-0330-2009. Available at

https://www.mahsyariahmelaka.gov.my/judgement/files/MRS/Tuntutan_Nafkah_Anak.pdf.

Darus v. Salma (1969) 3 JH 117.

Faridah Hanim bt Omar v. Abd. Latif Ashaari (2006) 22 (1) JH 27–45.

Hafizah Indra bt. Abdullah v. Jamaluddin bin Eusoff (2006) 22 (1) JH 54.

Hasanah bt Abdullah v. Ali b. Muda (1999) 13 (2) JH 159–184.

Jinah v. Aziz (1989) 6 JH (II) 344.

Mansor v. Che Ah (1975) 2 JH 261.

Mohd Hassan b. M. Ghazali v. Siti Sharidza bt. Mohd. Sidque (2004) 18 (2) JH 269–277.

Nora bt Ahmad v. Zabarni bin Chik (2009) 1 SHLR 178.

Rohana bt. Zakaria v. Mokhtar b. Abdul Talib (2009) 27 (2) JH 279–301.

Rokiah v. Abdul Aziz (1988) 4 (1) JH 156–164.

Roslaili bt Abd Ghani dan seorang yang lain v. Ahmad Azman b. Yaacob (2006) 1 SHLR 135.

Samsiah binti Yaacob v. Mohd Farid bin Yusoff (2017) 3 LNS 44.

Sanisah bt Saad v. Zulkifli b. Abd Ghani (2002) 15 (2) JH 197–207.

Siti Norzatulshima bt Abdullah v. Abdul Aziz bin Mat Hassan (2015) 42(1) JH.

Sri Utama Dewi Kasman v. Abu Bakar b. Abdullah (2010) 30 (1) JH 111–129.

Wan Tam v. Ismail (1991) 8 (1) JH 55–57.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.