Framing the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict: The Role of Metaphor, Nominalization, and Appraisal in Shaping Media Narratives

Judyta Pawliszko

Abstract


This article investigates how international media outlets frame the Russian-Ukrainian conflict using linguistic strategies such as metaphor, nominalization, and evaluative language. By analysing headlines and subheadings from The New York Times, The Moscow Times, and The Guardian, published between February 24 and March 24, 2022, this study examines how these linguistic devices shape the media’s portrayal of the war, reflect editorial stances, socio-political contexts, and ideological perspectives, and how these elements influence public perception. Drawing on Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Systemic Functional Linguistics (including Appraisal Theory), the study investigates how metaphors (e.g., ECONOMY, STORY/NARRATIVE, JOURNEY, GAME) and evaluative language contribute to the framing of the conflict. The analysis highlights the equally significant roles of metaphor, nominalization, and appraisal in shaping media narratives, demonstrating how political and cultural contexts influence these portrayals. The study concludes by arguing that an integrated analysis of metaphor, nominalization, and appraisal offers a more nuanced understanding of media coverage and its broader implications for public opinion and international relations.

 


Keywords


appraisal theory; conceptual metaphor; war; nominalization; media representation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.

Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Downing, A. (2000). Nominalisation and topic management in leads and headlines. In E. Ventola, (Ed.). Discourse and Community. Doing Functional Linguistics (pp. 355-378). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Arnold.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London/New York: Routledge.

Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London/New York: Routledge.

Halliday, M.A.K. (2003). Grammar, society and the noun. In J.J. Webster, (Ed.). On Language and Linguistics. The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, Volume 3 (pp. 50-73). London/New York: Continuum.

Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). On the grammar of scientific English. In J.J. Webster, (Ed.). The Language of Science. The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, Volume 5 (pp. 181-198). London/New York: Continuum.

Hodgson, F.W. (1996). Modern Newspaper Practice, Oxford: Focal Press.

Isani, S. (2011). Of headlines & headlinese: Towards distinctive linguistic and pragmatic genericity. Asp. 60, 81-102. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.2523

Jenkins, H. (1990). Train sex man fined: Headlines and cataphoric ellipsis. In M.A.K. Halliday, J. Gibbons & H. Nicholas, (Eds.). Learning, Keeping and Using Language: Selected Papers from the Eighth World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Volume 2 (pp. 349-362). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Koester, A. (2010). Building small specialised corpora. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 66-79). London/New York: Routledge.

Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kulyk, V. (2011). Language Identity, Linguistic Diversity and Political Cleavages: Evidence from Ukraine. Nations and Nationalism. 17(3), 627-648. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8129.2011.00493.x

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lambrou, M. & Durant, A. (2014). Media stylistics. In P. Stockwell, (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics (pp. 503-519). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lian J., Usher N. (2014). Crowd-Funded Journalism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 19(2), 155–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12051

Liu, C. H. (2019). Discourse Strategies of Government Communication in the New Media Era. China Broadcasting. 11, 41-45. https://doi.org/10.16694/j.cnki.zggb.2019.11.012

Luporini, A. (2021). Metaphor, Nominalization, Appraisal: Analyzing Coronavirus-Related Headlines and Subheadings in China Daily and The Wall Street Journal. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. 21(1), 253-273. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-15

Mardh, I. (1980). Headlinese: On the Grammar of English Front Page Headlines. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.

Martin, J. & White, P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pavlichenko, L. (2022). Polarization in media political discourse on the war in Ukraine: critical discourse analysis. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philoligy, 2(24), 214-223. DOI:10.32342/2523-4463-2022-2-24-18

Ritchie, L.D. & Zhu, M. (2015). ‘Nixon stonewalled the investigation’: Potential contributions of grammatical metaphor to Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Analysis. Metaphor and Symbol. 30(2), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1016837

Simon-Vandenbergen, A., White, P.R.R. & Aijmer, K. (2007). Presupposition and ‘taking-for-granted’ in mass communicated political argument: An illustration from British, Flemish and Swedish political colloquy. In A. Fetzer & G.E. Lauerbach, (Eds.). Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives (pp. 31-

.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Solopova, V., Benzmülle, C., Landgraf, T. (2023). The Evolution of Pro-Kremlin Propaganda From a Machine Learning and Linguistics Perspective. Proceedings of the Second Ukrainian Natural Language Processing Workshop (UNLP). 40-46. DOI:10.18653/v1/2023.unlp-1.5

Stenvall, M. (2008). On emotions and the journalistic ideals of factuality and objectivity – Tools for analysis. Journal of Pragmatics. 40, 1569-1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.017

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing Functional Grammar, third edition. London/New York: Routledge.

Tsang, A. (2018). The Guardian Sets Up a Nonprofit to Support Its Journalism. International New York Times. Retrieved April 6, 2024 from 28link.gale.com/apps/doc/A502156635/AONE?u=anon~588b5efb&sid=googleScholar&xid=efc234a8

van Dijk, T. (1998). Opinions and ideologies in the press. In A. Bell & P. Garrett, (Eds.). Approaches to Media Discourse (pp. 21-63). Oxford: Blackwell.

White, P.R.R. (2004). Subjectivity, evaluation and point of view in media discourse. In C. Coffin, A. Hewings & K. O’Halloran, (Eds.). Applying English Grammar (pp. 229- 246). London: Arnold.

White, P.R.R. (2011). Appraisal. In J. Zienkowski, J. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.). Discursive Pragmatics (pp. 14-36). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2025-2501-09

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021