Pictures in Online Dictionaries: Shall We See Them?
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to examine the influence of different access paths to pictures in online English learners’ dictionaries on meaning reception and retention. The article also explores the influence of pictures on the time of meaning comprehension. The following aspects of access to pictures in online learners’ dictionaries are investigated: making pictures instantly visible in entries, hyperlinking pictures, providing no pictures. In an online experiment, upper-intermediate foreign learners of English took part. They explained infrequent English concrete nouns based on reference to purpose-built monolingual dictionary entries. Three experimental conditions were created, depending on access to pictures in the entries: definitions with pictures visible by default (instantly visible pictures), definitions with pictures available upon clicking a hyperlink (hyperlinked pictures), definitions only (no pictures). Meaning comprehension and retention were evaluated based on L1 equivalents of the target nouns provided by the participants. The results reveal that instantly visible pictures and hyperlinked pictures improve meaning comprehension to a similar extent in comparison with the no-picture condition. However, meaning retention checked immediately after exposure is the most successful when pictures are visible by default in entries. Hyperlinked pictures prove to be no more useful for learning meaning than definitions without any pictorial support. They also extend comprehension time the most. Instantly visible pictures, in turn, neither speed up the comprehension of meaning nor slow it down compared to entries with no pictures. Considering their significant contribution to meaning comprehension and retention, instantly visible pictures seem to be the most recommendable in online dictionaries for learners of English.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acha, J. (2009). The effectiveness of multimedia programmes in children’s vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 40(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00800.x
Ayres, P. & Sweller, J. (2021). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 199-211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.011
Boers, F., Warren, P., He, L. & Deconinck, J. (2017). Does adding pictures to glosses enhance vocabulary uptake from reading? System. 66, 113-129.
Camiciottoli, B. C. & Campoy-Cubillo, M. C. (2018). Introduction: The nexus of multimodality, multimodal literacy, and English language teaching in research and practice in higher education settings. System. 77, 1-9.
Carpenter, S. K. & Geller, J. (2020). Is a picture really worth a thousand words? Evaluating contributions of fluency and analytic processing in metacognitive judgements for pictures in foreign language vocabulary learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 73(2), 211-224.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819879416
De Beni, R. & Moè, A. (2003). Imagery and rehearsal as study strategies for written or orally presented passages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 10, 975-980. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196561
Dressman, M. (2019). Multimodality and language learning. In M. Dressman & R. W. Sadler (Eds.), The Handbook of Informal Language Learning (pp. 39-55). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119472384.ch3
Dziemianko, A. (2022). The usefulness of graphic illustrations in online dictionaries. ReCALL. 34(2), 218-234. doi:10.1017/S0958344021000264
Ensor, T. M., Bancroft, T. D. & Hockley, W. E. (2019). Listening to the picture-superiority effect: Evidence for the conceptual-distinctiveness account of picture superiority in recognition. Experimental Psychology. 66(2), 134-153. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000437
Ensor, T. M., Surprenant, A. M. & Neath, I. (2019). Increasing word distinctiveness eliminates the picture superiority effect in recognition: Evidence for the physical-distinctiveness account. Memory and Cognition. 47(1), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0858-9
Fiorella, L. & Mayer, R. (2021). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 185-198). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. doi:10.1017/9781108894333.019
Hulstijn, J. H. & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning. 51, 539-558.
Kalyuga, S. & Sweller, J. (2021). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 212-220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.021
Klosa, A. (2015). Illustrations in dictionaries: Encyclopaedic and cultural information in dictionaries. In P. Durkin, (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Lexicography (pp. 515-531). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199691630.013.37
Lee, S. S. & Hazita, A. (2021). Integrating Facebook as a Web 2.0 tool in a responsive pedagogy for multimodal oral presentation skills. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 21(3), 103-124. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2103-06
Lew, R. (2010). Multimodal lexicography: The representation of meaning in electronic dictionaries. Lexikos. 20, 290-306. https://doi.org/10.4314/lex.v20i1.62717
Lew, R. & Doroszewska, J. (2009). Electronic dictionary entries with animated pictures: Lookup preferences and word retention. International Journal of Lexicography. 22(3), 239-257, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecp022
Lew, R., Kaźmierczak, R., Tomczak, E. & Leszkowicz, M. (2018). Competition of definition and pictorial illustration for dictionary users’ attention: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Lexicography. 31(1), 53-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecx002
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. https://www.ldoceonline.com/
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). The multimedia principle. In R. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 145-157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.015
Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/
Paivio, A. (2013). Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Psychology Press.
Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E. & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior. 19(2), 221-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00015-8
Ramezanali, N., Uchihara, T. & Faez, F. (2021). Efficacy of Multimodal glossing on second language vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. TESOL J. 55, 105-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.579
Sung, E. & Mayer, R. E. (2012). When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Computers in Human Behavior. 28(5), 1618-1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.026
Svensén, B. (2009). A Handbook of Lexicography: The Theory and Practice of Dictionary-making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, P. R. & McKay, J. B. (2010). Cognitive styles and instructional design in university learning. Learning and Individual Differences. 20(3), 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.002
Tight, M. (2023). Positivity bias in higher education research. Higher Education Quarterly. 77(2), 201-214.
Van den Broek, G. S. E., van Gog, T., Jansen, E., Pleijsant, M. & Kester, L. (2021). Multimedia effects during retrieval practice: Images that reveal the answer reduce vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 113(8), 1587-1608. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000499
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2024-2402-03
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021