Negotiating Price in the Elopement of the Sasak Culture: Politeness Acts in Disagreeing
Abstract
This study looks at how Sasak culture members employ diplomatic techniques to express disapproval when haggling over costs during elopement rites. Politeness gestures are language techniques for reducing face-threatening behaviours, such arguments, in order to preserve good social ties. Price negotiation inevitably happened during recorded discussions, which were analysed qualitatively for the study. The politeness theory developed by Brown and Levinson (1987) was used to assess the transcripts of the discussions. According to the research, interlocutor employ several politeness techniques when disagreeing, depending on the situation and their relationship to the other person. In situations where price of elopement is being discussed, interlocutors prefer to keep the relationship going over minimising face-threatening actions by using more positive politeness and off-the-record politeness techniques. Token agreement, pseudo-agreement, hedging opinions, comedy, and jokes all help to achieve positive politeness. The off-record politeness is realised through presupposing, overstating, metaphor, a rhetorical question, and irony. These findings contribute to our understanding of how interlocutors use language to manage social relationships in the context of disagreement. Findings of the present study may have implications for intercultural communication and conflict resolution, particularly in the context of negotiation skills and strategies involved in the post-elopement event among the Sasak.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adithia, M. P. (2010). The tradition of “Merariq” in Sasak ethnic group of Lombok Island. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–20. http://journal.unair.ac.id/download-fullpapers-02 Sasak__English Version.pdf
Afandi, A., & Rosada, R. (2019). Islam Dan Budaya Lokal Dalam Tradisi Merariq Di Desa Labuan Tereng Kecamatan Lembar Kabupaten Lombok Barat. Jurnal Ulul Albab. http://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/JUA/article/view/1726
Almutairi, S. (2021). Disagreement strategies and (im) politeness in Saudis’ twitter communication. In Journal of Languages, Texts, and Society. nottingham.ac.uk. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/groups/languagestextssociety/documents/lts-journal/issue-5/disagreement-strategies-and-impoliteness-in-saudis’-twitter-
communication-by-sarah-almutairi.pdf
Austin, P. K., & Nothofer, B. (2012). The history of speech levels in Sasak, eastern Indonesia. In 12th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics.
Austin, P. K. (2014). Aksara Sasak, an endangered script and scribal practice. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Endangered Scripts of Island Southeast Asia, February, 1–12. https://docplayer.net/39228817-Aksara-sasak-an-endangered-script-and-scribal-practice.html
Ben-Menachem, E. T., & Livnat, Z. (2018). Desirable and undesirable disagreements: Jewish women studying the talmudic texts. Journal of Pragmatics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216617301844
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4). In Cambridge University Press.
Chan, A., Schnurr, S., & Zayts, O. (2018). Exploring face, identity and relationship management in disagreements in business meetings in Hong Kong. Journal of Politeness Research, 14(2), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0036
Chi, N. (2018). Where Migration Meets Gender in Northeast Asia: Marriage Migrants and Domestic and Care Workers in Japan and South Korea. 年報 公共政策学. https://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/handle/2115/70305
Chiu, M. M., Oh, Y. W., Kim, J.-N., & Ioana A. Cionea. (2022). Serving the Greater Social Good for Personal Gain: Effects of Polite Disagreements in Online Debates. Communication Research, 49(3), 451–473. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00936502211053456?journalCode=crxa
Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M. (2019). The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im) politeness. library.alzahra.ac.ir. http://library.alzahra.ac.ir:8080/site/catalogue/887215
Decock, S., & Depraetere, I. (2018). (In)directness and complaints: A reassessment. Journal of Pragmatics, 132, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.010
Gyllenhaal, J., & Zimermann, Y. (2016). Politeness: A revisit. semanticsarchive.net. https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/GI0NzkwM/Gyllenhaal.pdf
Haugh, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2017). (Im) politeness theory. … Routledge Handbook of Language in the …. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315690001-7/im-politeness-theory-michael-haugh-yasuhisa-watanabe
Ishihara, N. (2016). Softening or intensifying your language in oppositional talk: Disagreeing agreeably or defiantly. In English for diplomatic purposes. researchgate.net. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Noriko-
Ishihara/publication/285004255_Softening_or_intensifying_your_language_in_oppositional_talk_Disagreeing_agreeably_or_defiantly/links/5714715e08aeff315ba35f0b/Softening-or-intensifying-your-language-in-opposition
Jones, J. F., & Adrefiza. (2017). Comparing apologies in Australian English and Bahasa Indonesia: Cultural and gender perspectives. Journal of Politeness Research, 13(1), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0033
Jucker, A. H., & Kopaczyk, J. (2017). Historical (im) politeness. … Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im) Politeness. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_17
Kádár, D. (2011). Introduction. In Politeness in East Asia (pp. 1–18). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.003
Kádár, D. Z. (2017a). Politeness, impoliteness and ritual. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=KeGBDgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=politeness&ots=N2kF4jHhE2&sig=n8vHo8QtJsdXXZB0EPmJ7JV67SA
Kádár, D. Z. (2017b). Politeness in pragmatics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-218
Kádár, D. Z., & House, J. (2021). “Politeness Markers” Revisited-A Contrastive Pragmatic Perspective. Journal of Politeness Research. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2020-0029
Khammari, H. (2021). Disagreeing in Tunisian Arabic: a Politeness and Pragmatic Study. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation …. http://www.ijlts.org/index.php/ijlts/article/view/141
Kurdghelashvili, T. (2015). Speech Acts and Politeness Strategies in an EFL Classroom in Georgia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic and Management Engineering, 9(1), 306–309. https://publications.waset.org/10000518/speech-acts-and-politeness-
strategies-in-an-efl-classroom-in-georgia
Locher, M A. (2015). Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im) politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216615001630
Locher, Miriam A, & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Lopez-Ozieblo, R. (2018). Disagreeing without a ‘no’: How teachers indicate disagreement in a Hong Kong classroom. Journal of Pragmatics, 137, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.016
Mahyuni, Y. (2004). Speech styles and cultural consciousness in the Sasak community, Lombok. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne.
Mao, Y., & Zhao, X. (2020). A discursive approach to disagreements expressed by Chinese spokespersons during press conferences. Discourse, Context & Media, 37, 100428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100428
Marsden, M. (2007). Love and elopement in northern Pakistan. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00415.x
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SagePublications.
Mohd, J., Aziz, J., & Musaev, T. (2020). The Interlanguage Pragmatics of Japanese Daily Greetings by Malaysian Learners. GEMA Online® Journal of Language …. http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/article/view/43126
Ogiermann, E. (2019). Researching im/politeness in face-to-face interactions: on disagreements in Polish homes. In … speech acts to lay understandings of politeness …. kclpure.kcl.ac.uk. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/84669664/Ogiermann_Disagreements_CUP_FINAL.pdf
Okamoto, S. p. (2010). Politeness in east Asia. In Interpersonal Pragmatics (pp. 71–100). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.1.71
Ramani, S., Post, S. E., Könings, K., Mann, K., & ... (2017). “It’s just not the culture”: a qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback. … and Learning in …. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2016.1244014
Redmond, M. V. (2015). Face and politeness theories. lib.dr.iastate.edu. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/engl_reports/2/
Richard, J. W. (2006). Book review. 38, 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.010
Tahir, M. (2012). Tradisi “ Merariq ” ( Kawin Lari ) Dalam Masyarakat Sasak ( Sebuah Telaah Konsepsi , Responsi dan Implikasi ). Harga Diri Ekspresi Budaya Lokal Suku-Bangsa Di Indonesia, 35–76. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id:80/id/eprint/19921
Tracy, K. (2017). Facework and (im)politeness in political exchanges. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness (pp. 739–758). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_28
Tseronis, A. (2021). How Face Threatening Are Disagreement Moves? A Proposal for an Integration of Insights from Politeness Theory into Argumentation Theory. The Language of Argumentation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52907-9_9
Yaqin, L. N. (2020). Sasakologi: Politeness Research in Sasak. Universitas Gunung Rinjani.
Yaqin, L. N., & Shanmuganathan, T. (2020). Politeness strategies of the pembayun(s) in the bride-kidnapping practices of sasak culture. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(1), 89–102.
Yaqin, L. N., Shanmuganathan, T., Fauzanna, W., Mohzana, & Jaya, A. (2022). Sociopragmatic Parameters of Politeness Strategies among the Sasak in the Post Elopement Rituals. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.24815/SIELE.V9I2.22569
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2304-05
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021