The Washback Effect Of The Iranian Universities Entrance Exam: Teachers’ Insights

Hadi Salehi, Melor Md Yunus

Abstract


The Entrance Exam of the Universities (EEU) in Iran is a multiple-choice high-stakes test which clearly affects its stakeholders. This effect, generally known as washback, can be considered negative or positive depending on the test and its intended use. The EEU is designed to screen the high school graduates for admission into higher education. This study aimed to investigate the washback effect of this high-stakes test on the Iranian high school English teachers. To achieve the aim of the study, a validated survey questionnaire was administered to stratified random sample of 132 high school English teachers who were teaching in the five main educational districts in the city of Isfahan, Iran. The data analysis revealed that the EEU negatively and implicitly influences English teachers to teach to the content and format of the test. Additionally, little attention was given to three language skills of speaking, writing, and listening in the classroom as these skills are not tested in the EEU. 


Keywords


Entrance Exam of the Universities (EEU), washback, high-stakes test, stakeholder, Teachers’ perspectives.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14,115-129.

Andrews, S. (1995). Washback or washout? The relationship between examination reform and curriculum innovation. In D. Nunan, R. Berry, & V. Berry (Eds.), Bringing about change in language education: Proceedings of the International Language in Education Conference 1994 (pp. 67-81). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

Bailey, D. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 257-279.

Chen, L.-M. D. (2002). Taiwanese junior high school English teachers’ perceptions of the washback effect of the basic competence test in English. Unpublished Ph.D, The Ohio State University, Ohio.

Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for HongKong. Language and Education, 11(1), 38-54.

Cheng, L. (1998). Impact of public English examination change on students’ perceptions and attitudes toward their English learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24(3), 279-301.

Cheng, L. (2004). The washback effect of a public examination change on teachers’ perceptions toward their classroom teaching. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 146-170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1989). Research methods in educations, London: Routledge.

Davies, A. (1990). Principles of language testing. Oxford: Blackwell.

Ferman, I. (2004). The washback of an EFL national oral matriculation. In L. Cheng, Y.

Ghoorchaei, B., Tavakoli, M., Nejad Ansari, D. (2010). The impact of portfolio assessment on Iranian EFL students’ essay writing: A process-oriented approach. GEMA OnlineTM Journal of Language Studies, 10(3), 35-51.

Green, A. (2007). Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre-session language courses. Assessment in Education, 14 (1), 75-97.

Hughes, A. (1993). Backwash and TOEFL 2000. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Reading.

Jin, Y. (2006). Improvement of test validity and test washback – The impact study of the College English Test Band 4 and 6. Foreign Language World, 6, 65-73.

Luxia, Q. (2007). Is testing an efficient agent for pedagogical change? Examining the intended washback of the writing task in a high-stakes English test in China. Assessment in Education, 14(1), 51-74.

Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press

Mizutani, S. (2009). The mechanism of washback on teaching and learning. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, The University of Auckland, Auckland.

Payne, D. A & McMorris, R. F. (1967). Educational and psychological measurement. Waltham, Mass: Blasisdell Pub. Co.

Qi, L. (2004). Has a high-stakes test produced the intended changes? In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 171-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language Testing, 13(3), 298-317.

Smith, M. L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8-11.

Watanabe, Y. (2004). Teacher factors mediating washback. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, &

A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp.129-146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Yildirim, O. (2010). Washback effects of a high-stakes university entrance exam: Effects of the English section of the university entrance exam on future English language teachers in Turkey. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 12 (2), 92-116.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021