“Yeah, absolutely and totally”: Boosters and Gender Differences in Student-Supervisor Consultations

Wasan Khalid Ahmed, Kesumawati A. Bakar, Hussein Alkhawaja

Abstract


Student-supervisor consultation is an essential academic requirement for Arab EFL male and female students to pass their postgraduate degree in Malaysian universities. During these consultations, students negotiate with their supervisors about their theses or final projects. However, these consultations form a challenge to these students as they need to demonstrate appropriate linguistic knowledge while corresponding to their supervisors’ comments and corrections. One aspect of the linguistic challenge is the use of boosters as any over or misuse of these devices can be interpreted as inappropriate behavior, thus might affect the student-supervisor relationships and cause communication breakdown. The purpose of this study was to determine the types, frequencies, and functions of boosters in relation to gender as used by these students during the academic consultations. The data were collected by means of eight naturally occurring consultations and a pragmatic knowledge questionnaire and then analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The findings showed that the students used a variety of boosting devices with the intensifying adverbs, style adjuncts, and factive verbs being the most frequent. The gender analysis revealed differences in the types and counts of boosters with the male students generally using significantly higher frequencies of boosters than the female students. The pragmatic analysis showed that the Arab students used boosters strategically to reinforce their speech, so that they show their knowledge and appear more convincing. Further, the use of the boosters was not meant by the students to express polite or impolite behaviors, but it was mainly an appropriate politic behavior.

 


Keywords


Boosters; gender; relational work; EFL Arab students; academic consultations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Khateeb, S. M., I. (2009). The speech act of thanking as a compliment response as used by the Arab speakers of English a comparative intercultural study. Master thesis, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

Alkhalaf, K. (2006). The Comprehension of Hedges and Boosters in Academic Texts by Arabic-speaking EFL Students. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta, Department of Educational Psychology.

Alkhawaja, H., & Paramasivam, S. (2015). A comparative discourse analysis of hedges in opinion giving by Arab EFL and Malay ESL learners in WhatsApp focused group discussions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th Malaysia International Conference on Foreign Languages (MICFL 2015), Malaysia.

Alward, A. S., Mooi, C. C., & Bidin, S. J. B. (2012). Hedges and boosters in the Yemeni EFL undergraduates’ persuasive essay: An empirical study. The Internet Journal of Language, Culture and Society, 34, 1-12.

Baxter, J. (2010). Discourse-analytic approaches to text and talk Research methods in linguistics (pp. 117-137). London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Caffi, C. (2007). Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Creswell, J. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4 ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson Education.

Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (1993). How many options is enough for a multiple-choice test item? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(4), 999-1010.

Hidayati, F., & Dallyono, R. (2015). The use of hedges and boosters as rhetorical devices in the construction of speeches. Masyarkat Linguistik Indonesia, 33(1), 53-71.

Holmes, J. (1984). Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 8(3), 345-365.

Holmes, J. (1990). Hedges and boosters in women's and men's speech. Language & Communication, 10(3), 185-205. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(90)90002-S

Kashiha, H. (2021). Stance-taking across monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 39(4), 352-362.

Lin, C.-Y. (2015a). An exploratory comparison of the use of modifiers by native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese in academic lectures. Text & Talk, 35(1), 77-100.

Lin, C.-Y. (2015b). Seminars and interactive lectures as a community of knowledge co-construction: The use of modifiers. English for Specific Purposes, 38, 99-108. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.02.002

Locher, M. A. (2004). Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication: Walter de Gruyter.

Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1(1), 9-33.

Recski, L. J. (2004). " It's Really Ultimately Very Cruel": contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 20(2), 211-234.

Schlyter, O. (2015). Gendered verbal behaviour in gatekeeping encounters: A comparative corpus study on men's and women's use of five linguistic features during job interviews (pp. 1-33): Stockholms universitet.

Serholt, S. (2012). Hedges and Boosters in Academic Writing-A Study of Gender Differences in Essays Written by Swedish Advanced Learners of English. (Unpublished Thesis), Gotensborgs Universitet.

Shengming, Y. (2009). The pragmatic development of hedging in EFL learners. (Unpublished Phd Dissertation), City University of Hong Kong.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yeganeh, M. T., & Ghoreyshi, S. M. (2015). Exploring Gender Differences in the use of Discourse Markers in Iranian Academic Research Articles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 684-689. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.104




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2303-14

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021