Multiple Aspects of Word Knowledge in Thai EFL Students: The Hierarchical Acquisition and Relationships

Worakrit Nontasee, Apisak Sukying

Abstract


This research explored the nature of the word knowledge construct by analyzing the hierarchical difficulty in acquiring different word knowledge aspects and their relationships. The research examined Nation’s (2013) framework, which is the most widely accepted conceptualization of what is involved in knowing a word. Therefore, this article presents the hypothesized concept of knowing a word as a multi-aspect construct. A battery test of word knowledge aspects was administered to 500 senior high school participants who were English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students in Thailand. The results showed that the receptive knowledge test of an aspect showed higher scores than its productive knowledge test. There was also a positive correlation between knowledge of the different aspects. Besides, an analysis of Implicational Scaling (IS) illustrated a valid implicational pattern of word knowledge aspects and found that productive knowledge could be known without complete mastery of all aspects of receptive knowledge. Finally, a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis demonstrated the benefit of the various word knowledge aspects to acquiring word knowledge. Overall, the current research corroborates previous evidence for the vocabulary acquisition pattern and the conceptualization of word knowledge and provides empirical evidence in a Thai EFL context. It also implies that word knowledge is acquired along a developmental learning continuum.

 


Keywords


Word acquisition; Word knowledge; Word aspects; Receptive word knowledge; Productive word knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Browne, C., Culligan, B., & Phillips, J. (2013). The new general service list. Retrieved 17 March, 2021, from www. Newgeneralservicelist. Org.

Bruton, A. (2009). The vocabulary knowledge scale: A critical analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(4), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300902801909

Bubchaiya, N. & Sukying, A. (2022). The effect of word part strategy instruction on the vocabulary knowledge of Thai primary school learners. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(5), 70-81.

https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v11n5p70

Chen, C., & Truscott, J. (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31, 693-713. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq031

Chui, A. S. Y. (2006). A study of the English vocabulary knowledge of university students in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 16, 1-23.

Coxhead, A. (2012). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

González-Fernández, B. (2022). Conceptualizing L2 vocabulary knowledge: An empirical examination of the dimensionality of word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(4), 1124-

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000930

González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2020). Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 481-505.

https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy057

Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9, 139-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2086306

Hayashi, Y., & Murphy, V. (2011). An investigation of morphological awareness in Japanese students of English. Language Learning Journal, 39(1), 105-120.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09571731003663614

Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002089

Hill, K. (1998). The effect of test-taker characteristics on reactions to and performance on an oral English proficiency test. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 209–230).

Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hopkins, C. D., & Antes, R. L. (1990). Classroom measurement and evaluation (3rd ed.). F. E. Peacock Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X011008020

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,

(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Ishii, T. (2005). Diagnostic test of vocabulary knowledge for Japanese learners of English [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham].

Ishii, T., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Developing an integrated diagnostic test of vocabulary size and depth. RELC Journal, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208101452

Jeensuk, S., & Sukying, A. (2021). An investigation of high school EFL learners’ knowledge of English collocations. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 8(1), 90-106.

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

Larson-Hall, J. (2016). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775661

Laufer, B. (2010). Form focused instructions in second language vocabulary learning. In R. Chacón Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse, & M. M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary

teaching and learning (pp. 15-27). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54(3), 399-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x

Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 36, 611-634. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu007

Lin, C. C. (2015). L2 word learnability: A focus on written form of words. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney].

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-386.

Magnussen, E. & Sukying, A. (2021). The impact of songs and TPR on Thai preschoolers’ vocabulary acquisition. THAITESOL Journal, 34(1), 71-95.

Milton, J., & Fitzpatrick, T. (2014). Dimensions of vocabulary knowledge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000382

Milton, J., & Hopkins, N. (2006). Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: Do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some students? The Canadian Modern Language

Review, 63(1), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1353/cml.2006.0048

Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759

Nontasee, W., & Sukying, A. (2020). The acquisition of vocabulary knowledge in Thai EFL high school students. Journal of Man and Society Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 63-87.

Nontasee, W., & Sukying, A. (2021). The learnability of word knowledge aspects in Thai EFL high school students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 34-55.

https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.3

Pellicer-Sanchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 31-55. https://doi.org/10125/66652

Peters, E. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20, 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814568131

Phakiti, A. (2007). Strategic competence and EFL reading test performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Peter Lang.

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942

Rickford, J. R. (2002). Implicational scales. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 142-167). Blackwell Publishers.

Schmitt, N. (1995). A fresh approach to vocabulary: Using a word knowledge framework. RELC Journal, 26(1), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829502600105

Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921

Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977

Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge?: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913-951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077

Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 17-36.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001022

Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do students know? TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 145-171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588328

Sridhanyarat, K. (2018). Thai learners’ acquisition of L2 collocations: An interlanguage perspective. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 18(1), 1-21. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1801-

Sukying, A. (2017). The relationship between receptive and productive affix knowledge and vocabulary size in an EFL Context. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney].

Sukying, A. (2018a). Investigating receptive and productive affix knowledge in EFL learners. In D. Hirsh (Ed.), Explorations in second language vocabulary research (pp. 183-218). Peter Lang.

Sukying, A. (2018b). The acquisition of English affix knowledge in L2 learners. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, 23(34), 89-102.

Sukying, A. (2020). Word knowledge through morphological awareness in EFL students. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 74-85.

Sukying, A. (2022). A taxonomy of English affix acquisition in EFL learners. In D. Hirsh (Ed.), Research perspectives in language and education (pp. 49-82). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b19346

Sukying, A., & Nontasee, W. (2022). The acquisition order of vocabulary knowledge aspects in Thai EFL students. World Journal of English Language, 12(5), 306-319.

https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n5p306

Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 381-98.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_3

Teng, F. (2016). The effects of word exposure frequency on incidental learning of the depth of vocabulary knowledge. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 53-70.

The Ministry of Education. (2008). English curriculum in 2551. Khurusapha Press. [in Thai].

Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 33-52.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050023

Webb, S. (2020). The routledge handbook of vocabulary studies. Routledge.

Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13-40.

https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13

Yowaboot, C., & Sukying, A. (2022). Using digital flashcards to enhance Thai EFL primary school students’ vocabulary knowledge. English Language Teaching, 15(7), 61-74.

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n7p61

Zhong, H. F. (2018). The relationship between receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: A perspective from vocabulary use in sentence writing. The Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 357-370.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1127403




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2301-02

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021