Meaning-Making in Literature: Unlocking Stances and Perspectives of ESL Readers

Tina Abdullah

Abstract


Meaning-making in reading literary texts is a process that is widely theorised, applied in instructions, and observed through research. While recognitions have been given to the value of literature for different purposes, trends in educational policies for literature in different curricula do not secure a clear and systematic way of how meaning-making should be explored. Research into meaning-making demonstrates the need to examine the process as this remains to be understudied. This study observed the meaning-making process through the stances and perspectives adopted among a group of ESL readers when meaning was made in reading a literary text. This case study employed Concurrent Verbal protocol for data collection. 31 participants, majoring in Teaching English as a Second language (TESL) were selected for the study. Qualitative data from the verbal protocol sessions were quantified using a pre-established set of 24 themes derived from the theoretical framework of the study. The themes were based on the Efferent, Aesthetic, and Critical stances and also the public and private perspectives of the Text, Reader, Universal Values, and Writer. The findings indicate that the Critical is favoured over the Efferent and Aesthetic stances. Public Textual Perspectives were also preferred over the Private Textual, Reader, Universal, and Writer’s perspectives. The implication of examining the meaning-making process from multiple perspectives would nurture learning aptitudes and encourage personal connection and engagement to literature. Future research should consider expanding the investigation into the meaning-making process on other categories of readers as well as literary genres.

 


Keywords


literature; meaning-making; perspectives; stance; Transactional theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Kadir, K. H., Tengku Mohamad Maasum, T. N. R. & Vengadasamy, R. (2012). Transactional reader response and foregrounding theories in ESL classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1684-1692.

Abrams, M. H. (1953). The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. Oxford University Press.

Boubekeur, S. (2021). Teaching short stories through the use of the reader-response theory: second-year students at Dr. Moulay Tahar University-Saida. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) 12(2), 83-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.6

Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. (2020). Returning to text: affect, meaning making and literacies. Reading Research Quarterly. Retrieved July 21, 2020 from http://shura.shu.ac.uk/25653/

Cobine, G. R. (1993). Developing Thinking Skills Through Literature. Teaching Guides for Teachers. ERIC Document.A58.

Collin, R. (2020). Four Models of Literature and Ethics. English Journal, 109(6), 45-51.

Dewi, N. (2018). Ecohumanism in teaching poetry for EFL students in Indonesia. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 18(2), 168-181. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1802-12

Eagleton, M.B. & Dobler, E. (2007). Reading the Web: Strategies for Internet Inquiry. The Guilford Press.

Edge, C. (2011). Making Meaning with “Readers” and “Texts”: A Narrative Inquiry into Two Beginning English Teachers’ Meaning Making from Classroom Events. Doctoral Dissertation. University of South Florida. Retrieved July 15, 2021 from https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4917&context=etd

Engku Atek, E. S., Hassan, I., Latiff Azmi, M. N., Azmi, N. J. & Yah Alias, M. H. (2020). Students’ perceptions of the English literature component in Malaysian secondary schools. Language Related Research, 11(5), 125-144.

Gabrielsen, I. L., Blikstad-Balas, M. & Tengberg, M. (2019). The role of literature in the classroom: How and for what purposes do teachers in lower secondary school use literary texts?. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 19, 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2019.19.01.13

Ishak, A. & Zainal, Z. (2019). Learners’ use of efferent, aesthetic and critical stances when reading a novel. LSP International Journal, 6(1).

Karolides, N. J. (2020). Reader Response in Elementary Classrooms: Quest and Discovery. Routledge.

Kromhout, J. & Scheckle, E. M. (2021). Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literature. Reading & Writing, 12(1), 1-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.4102/rw.v12i1.304

Magulod Jr, G. C. (2018). Innovative learning tasks in enhancing the literary appreciation skills of students. SAGE Open, 8(4), 2158244018820382. Retrieved July 28, 2021 from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244018820382

Marshall, J. (1989). Patterns of Discourse in Classroom Discussions of Literature. Research Report. Centre for the Learning and Teaching of Literature.

McLaughlin, M. & DeVoogd, G. (2004). Critical literacy as comprehension: Expanding reader response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 48, 1, 52-62.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2021). Laporan Analisis Keputusan Peperiksaan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia Tahun 2020. Retrieved June 30, 2021 from: https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat-turun/laporan-dan-statistik/lp/4375-laporan-analisis-keputusan-spm-2020/file

Ministry of Education Singapore. (2019). Literature in English Syllabus. Curriculum Planning and Development Division. Retrieved July 27, 2021 from https://www.moe.gov.sg/-/media/files/secondary/syllabuses/eng/2019literatureinenglishsyllabusloweranduppersecondary.pdf?

la=en&hash=C5756A2A2E90E1391931ABD4AD445081A5DBFE5B

Mohamad Uri, N. F. & Abd Aziz, M. S. (2019). Teachers’ evaluation of the suitability of reading syllabus specifications to the CEFR. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 32-44.

Nguyen, H. T. T. & Henderson, A. (2020). Can the reading load be engaging? Connecting the instrumental, critical and aesthetic in academic reading for student learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(2), 1-18 https://doi.org/10.14453/jutlp.v17i2.6

Noah, J. B. (2018). Cultivating responses from students through literature circle. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(1), 1-10.

Perry, M. S. (2020). Multimodal engagement through a transmedia storytelling project for undergraduate students. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 20(3), 19-40. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2003-02

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1993). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Southern Illinois University Press.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1994). The Transactional Model of Reading and Writing. In Ruddell, R.B., Ruddell, M.R. & Singer, H. (Eds.) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. (1057-1092). International Reading Association, Inc.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1995). Literature as Exploration. Modern Language Association.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (2005). Making Meaning with Texts: Selected Essays. Heinemann.

Ruddell, R. B. & Unrau, N. J. (1994). Reading as a Meaning Construction Process: The Reader, the Text, and the Teacher. In Ruddell, R. B., Ruddell, M. R. & Singer, H. (Eds.). Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. (996-1056). International Reading Association Inc.

Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2019). Gaining insight into human nature: A review of literature classroom intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 3-45. Retrieved August 3, 2021 from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3102/0034654318812914

Subramaniam, G. (2003). Linguistic pathways to the study of literature in the Malaysian ESL context. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 3(1).

Varga, Z., McGuinn, N., Naylor, A., Rimmereide, H. E. & Syed, G. K. (2020). We are invited to imagine: Using a literary text to encourage cross-cultural dialogue about citizenship. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(4), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1736002

Wang, Y. (2020). “It Broadens Our Horizon”: English Learners Learn Through Global Literature and Cultural Discussion. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(4), 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.965

Yeoh, G. S. (2009). Compare. In Coffee Break Tales. Pelanduk Publications Ptd. Ltd.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2104-14

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021