Metadiscourse as a Way of Achieving Persuasion in Literary Criticism Texts

Dunya AlJazrawi, Zeena AlJazrawi

Abstract


This study aims at examining the use of metadiscourse markers in literary criticism texts to identify the role of the reader and how these markers are used to produce more persuasive essays. The data of 72,727 words from 17 texts were written by three well-known authors, namely, T.S. Eliot, Virginia Woolf and Stanley Fish. Hyland’s (2005) model of interpersonal metadiscourse markers was used to analyze the data. The analysis revealed that metadiscourse markers are used by literary critics to create coherent and persuasive texts. It was found out that the theory of criticism adopted by the literary critics does not affect the use of metadiscourse markers only maybe in terms of relying more on logos, ethos or pathos. The results of this study comply with those of previous research showing that metadiscourse markers are frequently used in literary criticism texts.  This study will contribute to both the literary genre and the genre of critical essays by identifying the linguistic features to be used to produce more effective and convincing literary criticism texts. It will also help future critics to write more persuasive texts by highlighting the means that enable them to influence their readers and to produce more coherent and convincing texts.      


Keywords


metadiscourse; persuasion; literary criticism; essays; critical theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulmughni, S. A. S. (2019). Stylistics, literary criticism, linguistics and discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics. 9(2), 412.‏

Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Adel, A. (2012). "What I Want You to Remember Is…”: Audience orientation in monologic academic discourse. English Text Construction. 5(1), 101–127.

Ahangari, S. & Kazemi, M. (2014). A content analysis of ‘Alice in Wonderland’ regarding metadiscourse elements. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 3(3), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.10

Aljazrawi, D & Aljazrawi, Z (2019). The use of metadiscourse: An analysis of interactive and interactional markers in English short stories as a type of literary genre. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 8(3), 66-77.

Baktır, H. (2018). Metinde anlam: Okur – tepkisi eleştiri kuramı. Temaşa Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi. 8, 97-105.

Bäcklund, I. (1998). Metatext in professional writing: A contrastive study of English, German and Swedish. Texts in European writing communities 3. Uppsala universitet. TeFa nr 25.

Beckson, K., & Ganz, A. (1989). Literary Terms: A Dictionary: 3rd ed. New York: Noonday Press.

Bressler, Charles E. (2002). Literary criticism: An Introduction to Theory and practice. New Jersey: Upper saddle River.

Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D theses. English for Specific Purpose. 18, 41–56 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2

Cavalieri, S. (2011). The role of metadiscourse in counsels’ questions. Exploring courtroom discourse: The language of power and control, 79-110.‏

Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang. https://books.google.com/books?id=BXsFAQAAIAAJ

Crismore, A., Markkanen, R. & Steffensen, M.S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish University students. Written Communication. 10(1), 39-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002.

Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics. 36(10), 1807–1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004

Dainton, M. (2005). Applying Communication Theory for Professional Life: A Practical Introduction. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGU Publications.

Eagleton, T. (2001). Literary Theory: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Minnesota; The University of Minnesota Press.

Garsten, B. (2006). Saving Persuasion: A Defence of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Griffith, K. (2002). Writing Essays about Literature. (A Guide and Style Sheet). Thompson Heinle Incorporation.

Habib, M.A.R. (2005). Modern Literary Criticism and Theory. A History. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Halmari, H. & Vritanen, T. (2005). Persuasion across Genres: A Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Harris, W. V. (1996). The discourse of literary criticism and theory. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy.. 10(1), 75-88..

Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. Journal of Business Communication. 35(2), 224–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum. https://books.google.com/books?id=kyztT1czUfMC

Hyland, K. & Tse, p. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics.25(2), 2-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156

Iser, W. (1974). The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Khedri, M. (2014). A cross-disciplinary exploration of metadiscourse in experimental research articles. Unpublished PhD thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Larson, C. (2010). Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Lee, J.J. & Subtirelu, N.C. (2015). Metadiscourse in the classroom: A comparative analysis of EPA lessons and university lectures. English for Specific Purpose. 37(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.005

Lynn, S. (1998). Texts and Contexts: Writing about Literature with Critical Theory. New York: Longman.

Mahmood, I. I., & Kasim, Z. M. (2019). Interpersonal metadiscursive features in contemporary Islamic Friday sermon. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 25(1), 85 – 99.

Mahmood, I. I., & Kasim, Z. M. (2021). Metadiscourse Resources across Themes of Islamic Friday Sermon. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 21(1), 45-60.

Mailloux, Steven. (1976). Stanley Fish’s “Interpreting the Variorum”: Advance or Retreat? Critical Inquiry. 3(1), 183-190. The University of Chicago Press.

Makaryk, I. (1993). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory: Approaches, Scholars, Terms. University of Toronto Press.

Malaskova, M. (2014). Hedging in Academic Discourse: A Comprehensive Analysis of Applied Linguistics and Literary Criticism Research Articles. PhD Dissertation. Masaryk University.

Malmstrom, H. (2014). Engaging the congregation: The place of metadiscourse in contemporary preaching, Applied Linguistics. 37(4), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu052

Mao, L. R. (1993). I conclude not: Toward a pragmatic account of metadiscourse. Rhetoric Review. 11(2), 265-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350199309389006

Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Miller, G. R. (1980). On being persuaded: Some basic distinctions. In M. E. Roloff and G. R. Miller (Eds.), Persuasion: new directions and theory and research (Sage annual reviews of communication research. 8, (PP. 1128). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

O’keefe, Daniel, J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Ransom, J. C. (1941). The New Criticism. Folcroft, Pa.: Folcroft Library Editions.

Schiffrin, D. (1980). Metatalk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse”. Sociological Inquiry: Language and Social Interaction. 50(3-4), 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00021.x .

Simons, H. W. (1976). Persuasion: Understanding, Practice, and Analysis. New York: Newbery Award Records, Inc.

Stern, B. B. (1989). Literary criticism and consumer research: Overview and illustrative analysis. The Journal of Consumer Research. 16, (322-334).

Telenius, J. (1994). Guiding the reader: The use of metatext in master's theses written in English. Helsingin School of Economics and Business Administration.

Teubner, R. (2017). An Analysis of T.S Eliot’s The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. Macat Library.

Turiman, S., Abdullah, N., & Noor, N. M. (2018). Spoken metadiscourse in Malaysian ESL job interviews. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 18(3).

Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse, College Composition and Communication. 36(1), 82-93.

Vande Kopple, W. & Shoemaker, A. (1988). Metadiscourse and the recall of modality markers. Visible Language, 22(2), 233.

Williams, J. (1981). Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. Glenview, Illinois: Scott: Foresman and Company.

Yipei, N. & Lingling, L. (2013). Investigating the interpersonal and textual meanings of Steve Jobs Stanford speech in terms of Hyland’s metadiscourse theory. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 1(4), 90–96.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2103-14

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021