Portraying Economic Competence in Malaysian Federal Budget Speeches

Kumaran Rajandran

Abstract


Budget speeches are a fixed political event in Malaysia. Their content involves the whole country and a variety of domains. Despite the cornucopia of research on speeches, budget speeches are rarely selected and speeches from Malaysia have not been examined in detail. The discourse in these speeches can display how a developing country tackles economic decision-making. The article explores the portrayal of economic competence in Malaysian federal budget speeches. It conducts a linguistic analysis grounded in critical discourse studies. The analysis employs frequency, concordance and the representation of social actors to decipher monetary amount, politonyms, ethnonyms and toponyms. The discourse in budget speeches can portray economic competence, which has three characteristics. First, the government can claim to be financially solvent and propose significant initiatives. Second, the government introduces desirable initiatives because it intervenes to ensure economic growth. Third, the government helps citizens of several ethnicities and regions although Bumiputeras, Sabah and Sarawak are prioritized. The portrayal entails an ideological government-citizen binary because the government is the source of initiatives while citizens are the target of initiatives. The portrayal was reproduced in other texts and was repeated in the media. The portrayal became the endorsed way to think about the former Barisan Nasional (BN) government but other parties questioned it. The article argues that BN sought to legitimize its political power but its legitimacy became compromised, and it was defeated in the 2018 general elections.

 


Keywords


political discourse; economy; budget; speech; portrayal; critical discourse studies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.

Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In A. Halsey, P. Brown, H. Lauder & A. Wells (Eds.), Education (pp. 46-58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Carlsson, B. & Eliasson, G. (1994). The nature and importance of economic competence. Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 3(1), 687-711.

Cheng, M. (2006). Constructing a new political spectacle: Tactics of Chen Shui-bian’s 2000 and 2004 inaugural speeches. Discourse and Society. Vol. 17(5), 503-608.

Chung, J. & Park, H. (2010). Textual analysis of a political message: The inaugural messages of two Korean presidents. Social Science Information. Vol. 49(2), 215-239.

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2017). Statistical Handbook. Putrajaya: Department of Statistics.

Don, Z., Knowles, G. & Fatt, C. (2010). Nationhood and Malaysian identity: A corpus-based approach. Text & Talk. Vol. 30(3), 267-287.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse. London: Routledge.

Felker, G. (2015). Malaysia’s development strategies. In M. Weiss (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Malaysia (pp. 133-147). London: Routledge.

Ferry, L., Zakaria, Z. & Eckersley, P. (2014). The role of budget speech: A Malaysian government study. International Journal of Public Sector Management. Vol. 27(7), 564-580.

Ghazali, K. (2003). Discourse and leadership of Dr. Mahathir Mohamad: The relational value of texts to create solidarity. Journal of Modern Languages. Vol. 15, 155-167.

Google Ngram Viewer. (2019). Retrieved February 18, 2019 from https://books.google.com/ngrams

Gregor, M. & Macková, A. (2015). Euroscepticism the Czech way: An analysis of Václav Klaus’ speeches. European Journal of Communication. Vol. 30(4), 404-417.

Halliday, M. (2003). On the architecture of language. In J. Webster (Ed.), On Language and Linguistics (Volume 3) (pp. 1-29). London: Continuum.

Halliday, M. & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Hasan, S. & Yussof, I. (2009). Economic development in Malaysia since independence. In I. Yussof (Ed.), Malaysia’s Economy (pp. 1-22). Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Strategic Research Center.

Hutchinson, F. (2014). Malaysia’s federal system: Stifling local initiative? In S. Das & L. P. Onn (Eds.), Malaysia’s Socio-economic Transformation (pp. 278-307). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Jarrett, H. (2016). Consociationalism and identity in ethnically divided societies: Northern Ireland and Malaysia. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. Vol. 16(3), 401-415.

Karaliova, T. (2016). Let them talk: New Year’s presidential rhetoric in Russia, Belarus, and Poland. Journal of Communication Inquiry. Vol. 40(2), 145-161.

Lafaye de Micheaux, E. (2017). The Development of Malaysian Capitalism. Petaling Jaya: SIRD.

Lim, E. (2002). Five trends in presidential rhetoric: An analysis of rhetoric from George Washington to Bill Clinton. Presidential Studies Quarterly. Vol. 32(2), 328-366.

Loh, F. (2015). Centralized federation in Malaysia. In M. Weiss (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Malaysia (pp. 72-82). London: Routledge.

Lukin, A. (2015). The construction of a ‘narrative’ in Australian federal budget speeches 1996-2013. Australian Journal of Political Science. Vol. 50(2), 258-278.

Nasrudin, A., Kim, K. H. & Suh, C-S. (2013). Structure and agency in the Malaysian government’s policies for economic development. The Economic and Labor Relations Review. Vol. 24(4), 495-516.

Ooi K. B. (2014). Prisons to mind in Malaysia. In S. Das & L. P. Onn (Eds.), Malaysia’s Socio-economic Transformation (pp. 263-272). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Pant, H. (2002). Economic crisis and regime change: A study of Indonesia and Malaysia. International Studies. Vol. 39(4), 387-405.

Rajandran, K. (2013). Metaphors for Malaysia’s economic transformation programme. Kajian Malaysia. Vol. 31(2), 19-35.

Rajandran, K. & Fauziah T. (2014). Disclosing compliant and responsible corporations: CSR performance in Malaysian CEO Statements. Gema Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 14(3), 143-157.

Scott, M. (2012). WordSmith Tools version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.

Slavíčková, T. (2013). The rhetoric of remembrance: Presidential Memorial Day speeches. Discourse and Society. Vol. 24(3), 361-379.

Steger, M. & Roy, R. (2010). Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Thompson, N. (2015). New liberalism, new language? The use of collectivist concepts in the budget speeches of 1893-95 and 1906-14.

Cogent Arts and Humanities. Vol. 2, 1-22.

Utusan Online. (2017, January 25). Kerajaan BN bukan retorik - PM. Utusan Melayu. Retrieved February 18, 2019 from http://www.utusan.com.my/berita/nasional/kerajaan-bn-bukan-retorik-pm-1.436400

van Dijk, T. (2016). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods in Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 62-85). London: Sage.

van Dijk, T. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 11, 11-52.

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Windt, T. (1986). Presidential rhetoric: Definition of a field of study. Presidential Studies Quarterly. Vol. 16(1), 102-116.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1901-02

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021