From Natural Selection to the Sentient Symphony of Life: A Chaotic Reading of Wertenbaker’s After Darwin
Abstract
Darwin’s theory of evolution was shaken to the core by the discovery of the second law of thermodynamics and entropy. While it accentuates that the world has evolved from simple to complex, and it moves from disorder to order, the second law preaches the opposite totally. Such inconsistency remains unsolved until the advent of chaos theory, which emphasises that the universe has the capacity to renew itself from within through a process called self-organisation. As a new paradigm shift in science, it pushed scientists to re-read Darwinism from an entirely different perspective. The paper intends to trace the various interpretations of Darwinism in Timberlake Wertenbaker’s After Darwin (1998) through characters’ responses to evolution, utilising chaos theory as a theoretical and methodological framework. The play, which offers a Darwinian-Dawkinsian vision of competition, ends by embracing Margulis and Sagan’s view of cooperation inspired by the new science of chaos. As the only species endowed with an independently functioning brain, Man is able to adapt and turn the table against the brutality of natural selection to establish his own values.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alonso, M. (1990). Organization and Change in Complex Systems. New York: Paragon House.
Barr, K. S. (2008) Darwin on Stage: Evolutionary Theory in the Theatre. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. Vol. 33(2), 107-115.
---. (2006). Science on Stage: From Doctor Faustus to Copenhagen. Princeton University Press.
Brooks, D. R. & Wiley, E. O. (1988). Evolution as Entropy: Toward a Unified Theory of Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Butz, M. R. (1993). Practical Applications from Chaos Theory to the Psychotherapeutic Process, a Basic Consideration of Dynamics. Psychological Reports. Vol. 73(2), 543-554.
Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Anchor Books.
Crutchfield, J.P. (2011) Between Order and Chaos. Nature Physics. Vol. 8(1), 17-24.
Davies, P. C. W. (1988). The Cosmic Blueprint: New Discoveries in Nature’s Creative Ability to Order the Universe. Templeton Foundation Press.
---. (1978). The Runaway Universe. Harper & Row.
Dawkins, Richard. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
Freeman, S. (2010). Tragedy After Darwin: Timberlake Wertenbaker Remakes "Modern" Tragedy. Comparative Drama. Vol. 44(2), 201-227.
---. (2002) Adaptation after Darwin: Timberlake Wertenbaker’s Evolving Texts. Modern Drama. Vol. 45(4), 646-62.
Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (1995) Psychoanalysis and Dynamical Systems Theory: Prediction and self-Similarity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. Vol. 43(4), 1085-1114.
Gillespie, M. P. (2008). The Aesthetics of Chaos: Nonlinear Thinking and Contemporary Literary Criticism. University of Florida Press.
Gleick, James. (1987). Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Penguin Group.
Goerner, S. J. (1994). The Physics of Evolution: From Chaos to Evolution and Deep Ecology. The Journal of New Paradigm Research. Vol. 42(3-4), 193-214.
Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W. W. Norton.
Gribbin, J. R. (2004). Deep Simplicity: Chaos, Complexity and the Emergence of Life. London: Allen Lane.
Hayles, N. K. (1991). Complex Dynamics in Literature and Science. In N.K.Hayles, (Ed.). Chaos and Order: Complex Dynamics in Literature and Science (pp. 1-33). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
---. (1990). Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kauffman, S. (1995). At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press.
Kellert, S. H. (1994). In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems. University of Chicago Press.
Lewin, R. (1999). Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. University of Chicago Press.
Longa, V. M. & Lorenzo, G. (2014). Self-Organization and Natural Selection: The Intelligent Auntie’s Vade Mecum. Biolinguistics. Vol. 8(2014), 130-40.
Margulis, L. & Sagan, D. (1995). What is Life? Berkeley: University of California Press.
Midgley, M. (1983) Selfish Genes and Social Darwinism. Philosophy. Vol. 58(225), 365-77.
Parker, Jo. A. (2007). Narrative Form and Chaos Theory in Sterne, Proust, Woolf, and Faulkner. Palgrave Macmillan.
Porush, David. (1991) Prigogine, Chaos, and Contemporary Science Fiction. Science Fiction Studies. Vol. 8(3), 367-386.
Prigogine, l. & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books.
Remer, Roy. (2003). Chaos Theory and its Implications for Counseling Psychology. Retrieved January 06, 2017 from https://www.google.com/#q=Chaos Theory and its Implications for Counseling Psychology
Ruddick, N. (2001) The Search for a Quantum Ethics: Michael Frayn's Copenhagen and Other Recent British Science Plays. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. Vol. 11(4), 415- 431.
Steenburg, D. (1991) Chaos at the Marriage of Heaven and Hell. Harvard Theological Review. Vol. 84(4), 447 466.
Taghizadeh, A. (2016). Faith and Reason in the Mad Subjectivity: Cormac McCarthy’s Post-apocalyptic Narrative “The Road”. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 16(2), 173- 185.
Wertenbaker, T. (1998). After Darwin. England: Dramatic Publishing.
Wilcox, D. (1996). What Does Chaos Theory Have to Do with Art?"
Modern Drama. Vol. 39(4), 698-711.
Yas, K. A. (2017). The Butterfly Effect Hits Complicité: A Chaotic Reading of “Mnemonic” and “A Disappearing Number.” 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 23(2), 109-122.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1801-10
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021