Penguasaan Ciri Aliran Tematik Penulisan Bahasa Sepanyol Bukan Natif (The Mastery of Writing Spanish Thematic Progression Feature by Non Native)
Abstract
Aliran tematik adalah berkenaan cara idea dilanjutkan ayat demi ayat dalam teks. Dengan itu, aliran tematik merupakan unsur penting dalam penghasilan sesebuah penulisan. Kajian penulisan tertumpu kepada kajian linguistik, pembelajaran dan pengajaran dan eksperimental benar. Namun, kajian linguistik yang memfokuskan aliran tematik hanya mengkaji pembinaan aliran tematik yang terkandung dalam teks tanpa melibatkan pembolehubah kategori pelajar, manakala kajian penghasilan teks sebagai bahasa asing selain bahasa Inggeris amat terhad dan tidak membincangkan hubungan antara pencapaian bahasa dengan pemanfaatan jenis aliran tematik. Maka, makalah ini membahaskan penguasaan ciri aliran tematik penulisan naratif yang dihasilkan oleh pelajar tahap lanjutan bahasa Sepanyol bukan natif berdasarkan pembolehubah kategori pelajar dan mengenal pasti hubungannya dengan pencapaian bahasa. Kajian ini menganalisis 30 teks naratif yang melibatkan 106 buah perenggan. Pergerakan aliran tematik dalam setiap perenggan dianalisis berpandukan skema aliran tematik, Rema Regresi, Rema Ulangan, Tema Rencam, Box Development dan Pair to Single Development. Hasil kajian memaparkan, ketiga-tiga kategori pelajar mewacanakan penulisan secara dominan menerusi aliran Tema Rencam tanpa peka kepada genre penulisan. Pembolehubah kategori pelajar secara hakikatnya tidak memainkan peranan dan tidak mempengaruhi pembinaan aliran tematik mereka. Tiada hubungan yang signifikan antara aliran tematik dengan pencapaian bahasa diperolehi. Hasil penemuan ini membuktikan aliran tematik berupaya dijadikan sebagai satu teknik yang efektif kepada guru dan pelajar untuk membentuk dan membina sebuah penulisan yang berkesinambungan.
Kata kunci: aliran tematik; penulisan, bahasa Sepanyol; tema dan rema; hubungan
ABSTRACT
Thematic progression refers to how an idea is expanded from one sentence to another in a text. Therefore, thematic progression is an important element in writing production. Studies on writing have mostly focused on the linguistic, learning and teaching, and experimental study. However, studies on thematic linguistic dimension have only discussed the thematic progression surrounding a text without taking into account other variables such as student category, while studies on text production as a foreign language other than English are limited and do not explore the relationship between the language proficiency with the use of thematic progression. Therefore, this study aims to explain the mastery of thematic progression in narrative texts produced by non-native advanced students of Spanish based on students’ category and to identify their relationship with language achievement. This study analyses 30 narrative texts which involves 106 paragraphs. The movement of ideas in each paragraph is analysed based on the thematic progression scheme outline, Rheme Regression, Rheme Iteration, Mix Theme, Box Development and Pair to Single Development. The findings reveal that all categories of students utilize Mix Theme dominantly without paying attention to the genre of writing. Student category, in fact do not play a role nor influence the construction of their thematic progression. No significant correlation was found between thematic progressions with the language achievement. These findings prove that the thematic progression is capable as an effective technique to teachers and students to form and develop a coherent writing.
Keywords: thematic progression; writing; Spanish; theme and rheme; correlation
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Almaden, D.O. (2006). An Analysis of the Topical Structure of Paragraphs Written by Filipino Students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 15(1), 127-153.
Alonso, B.I. (2002). El análisis del discurso en acción: el papel de las nociones de tema y rema en la enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras. In Miquel, L. and Sans, N. (Ed.),
Didáctica del Español como Lengua Extranjera, Colección
Expolingua 5. (pp. 9-23). Madrid: Fundación Actilibre,
Alonso, B. I. (1997). Un estudio de la progresión temática en las composiciones escritas de los alumnos de E/LE. In F. F. Moreno, B. M. Gil, & K. Alonso (Ed.). ASELE. Actas del VIII
Congreso Internacional de ASELE. El Español como Lengua Extranjera: del Pasado al Futuro (pp. 105-113). Alcala de Henares (Madrid): Universidad de Alcalá.
Alonso, B. & McCabe, A. (1998). Theme-Rheme in L2 writing. Didáctica. 10, 13-31.
Azlina Mohd Sera’ai & Maserah Shabudin. (2015). Ciri Aliran Tematik Karangan Ekpositori Bahasa Sepanyol Sebagai Bahasa Asing. Jurnal e-Bangi, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 10(2), 41-56.
Belcher, D. (2013). The Scope of L2 Writing: Why We Need a Wider Lens. Journal of Second Language Writing. 22(4), 438-439.
Cassany, D. 2005. Expresión Escrita en L2/ELE. Arco/Libros, S.L: Madrid.
CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment) (2001). Cambridge University Press.
Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F.Daneš, (Ed.). Papers on Functional Sentence Persepctive (pp. 106-128). Prague:Academia/ The Hague: Mouton.
Ebrahimi, S. F., & Ebrahimi, S.J. (2012). Information Development in EFL Students Composition Writing. Advances in Asian Social Science. 1(2), 212-217.
Enkvist, N. E. (1974). Theme Dynamics and Style: An Experiment. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia. 5,127-135.
Fries, P.H. (1983). On the status of Theme in English: arguments from discourse. In Janos Petöfi and Emel Sözer (Ed.). Micro and Macro Connexity of Texts (pp. 116-152). Papers in Textlinguistics 45. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Fries, P.H. (2002). The flow of information in a written text. In Fries, Cummings, Lockwood,
and Spruiell (Ed.). Relations and Functions in Within and Around Language (pp. 117-155). London: Continuum Press.
Gao, L. (2012). Examining argumentative coherence in essays by undergraduate students of English as a foreign language in Mainland China and their English speaking peers in the United States. Unpublished Ph.D Tesis, Florida International University, Miami, United States.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar 3rd Edition. Great Britain: Hodder Arnorld.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hawes, T., & Thomas, S. (1997). Problems of Thematisation in Student Writing. RELC Journal. 28(2), 35-55.
Hickmann, M. (2003). Children’s Discourse: Person, Space and Time Across Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Idris Aman. (2010). Analisis Wacana. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Jalilifar, A. (2010). Thematization in EFL Students’ Composition Writing and Its Relation to Academic Experience. RELC Journal. 41(1), 31-45.
Johns, A.M. (2008). Genre Awareness for the Novice Academic Student: An Ongoing Quest. Language Teaching. 41(2), 237-252.
Kim, Y., & Yoon, H. (2014). The use of L1 as a writing strategy in L2 writing tasks. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 14(3), 33-50.
Kubota, R. (2013). Dislimiting Second Language Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 22(4), 430-431.
Lee, I. (2002). Teaching Coherence to ESL Students: A Classroom Inquiry. Journal of Second Language Writing.
(2), 135-159.
Longacre, R.E. (1979). The Paragraph as a Grammatical Unit. Syntax and Semantics. 12, 115-134.
Maleki, H., & Jalili, E. (2014). An Analysis of the Thematic
Structures in Persian and English Expository and Narrative Texts. International Journal for Teachers of English. 4(2), 139-170.
McCabe, A. M. (1999). Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history texts. Unpublished Ph.D Tesis, Aston University, Birmingham, England.
Medve, V. B., & Takac, V. P. (2013). The influence of cohesion and coherence on text quality: A cross-linguistic study of foreign language learners’ written production. In E. Piechurska-Kuciel & E. Szymańska-Czaplak (Ed.). Language in Cognition and Affect (pp. 111-131). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Norfaizah A. Jobar & Anida Sarudin. (2014). Proses Tematik Dalam Pembinaan Karangan Karangan: Analisis Teori Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Kajian Linguistik. 1, 126-140.
Norfaizah Abdul Jobar, Anida Sarudin & Idris Mohd Radzi. (2014). Pola Tematik dan Implikasinya Dalam Pengajaran Penulisan Karangan. Jurnal Pendeta. 5, 25-41.
Oxford, R., Cho, Y., Leung, S., & Kim, H-J. (2004). Effect of the Presence and Difficulty of Task on Strategy Use: An Exploratory Study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL). 42(1), 1-47
Ping, A. L. (2005). Talking Themes: The Thematic Structure of Talk. Discourse Studies. 7(6), 701-732.
Reichelt, M., Lefkowitz, N., Rinnert, C., & Schultz, J. M. (2012). Key Issues in Foreign Language Writing. Foreign Language Annals. 45(1), 22-41.
Rosniah Mustaffa & Idris Aman. (2007). Thematic Progression in the Writings of Undergraduate LEP Learners. The International Journal of Learning. 14(9), 67-82.
Sánchez, D. (2009). La Expresión Escrita en La Clase de ELE. MarcoELE: Revista de Didactica Del Espanol Como Lengua Extranjera. 8(1), 1-41.
Van Esch, K., De Haan, P., Frissen, L., Gonzalez Santero, I., & De La Torre Miranda, A. (2006). Evolución en La Competencia Escrita de Estudiantes de Español Como Lengua Extranjera. Estudios de Linguistica Aplicada. 43, 55-76.
Wang, L. (2007). Theme and Rheme in the Thematic Organization of Text: Implication For Teaching Academic Writing. Asian EFL Journal. 9(1), 1-11.
Wennerstrom, A. (2003). Discourse Analysis in The Language Classroom: Genres of Writing. Ann Arbor: The University Of Michigan Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1702-06
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021