Investigating The Undergraduate Experience Of Assessment In Higher Education

Lee King Siong, Hazita Azman, Koo Yew Lie

Abstract


This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a doctoral study in progress, which is situated in the context of quality in higher education, and is premised on the view that the student learning experience is ultimately the most meaningful and lasting measure of academic quality. The literature on assessment in higher education clearly places assessment at the heart of student learning and it is claimed that “the truth about an educational system” may be discovered by examining its assessment procedures (Rowntree, 1987, p.1). Using a qualitative case study approach, the study aims to reveal the values inherent in assessment, to show how these are conveyed through institutional discourses and through practices of lecturers, and how students’ learning behaviour may be affected by their perspectives of assessment. Data gathering activities for the entire doctoral research include focus group discussions and individual interviews with final-year undergraduates, interviews with their lecturers, observations of lectures and classroom assessments, examination of documents related to the course descriptions and assessment, as well as a study of the administrative and procedural aspects of assessment which are part of the assessment praxis. The emerging themes reported here, based solely on the analysis of two of the focus group discussions, indicate how assessment praxis in higher education seems to be a reproduction of dominant power structures that have inculcated patterns of student passivity in learning. This has serious implications for the university’s agenda for transformation, and broadly, the shaping of participatory democracy in citizenry.

 


Keywords


assessment, higher education, undergraduate experience, student perspectives of assessment, influence of assessment on learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Astin, A.W. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Westport: American Council on Education/The Oryx Press.

Astin, A.W. (1999). Assessment, student development, and public policy. In S. J. Messick (Ed.) Assessment in higher education: Issues of access, quality, student development, and public policy, (pp.157-175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education: total quality care. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.

Barnett, R. (2007). Assessment in higher education: an impossible mission? In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: learning for the longer term, (pp. 47-68). London: Routledge.

Becker, H.S., Geer, B. & Hughes, E. (1968). Making the grade: The academic side of college life. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Boud, D. J. (1988). Assessment in problem-based learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Special Issue, 13(2), 87-91.

Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and Learning: Contradictory or Complementary? In P. Knight. (1995). Assessment for learning in higher education, (pp.35-48). London: Kogan Page

Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (2007a). Introduction: assessment for the longer term. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: learning for the longer term, (pp. 3-13). London: Routledge.

Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (2007b). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. London: Routledge.

Bramming, P. (2007). An argument for strong learning in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 45-56.

Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, assessment and society: a sociological analysis. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Brown, S. (1999) Institutional strategies for assessment. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches. (pp.3-13). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Brown, S. & Glasner, A. (1999). Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and

using diverse approaches. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Brown, G., Bull, J. & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.

Brown, S. & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

Brown, S. & Glasner, A. (1999). Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Burke, J. (1995). Introduction and overview. In Burke, J. (Ed.), Outcomes, learning and the curriculum. (pp. 3-29), London: The Falmer Press.

Cronbach, L.J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116-127

Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Whitrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd edition). (pp. 119-161). Old Tappan, N.J.: Macmillan.

Erwin, T.D. & Knight, P. (1995). A transatlantic view of assessment and quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, l (2), 179-188.

Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement. Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.

Filer, A. (2000). Assessment: Social practice and social product. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Foziah Rahman. (2004). Assessing the usefulness of the group discussion task in the MUET Speaking Test. Unpublished Masters dissertation, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Hinett, K. & Knight, P. (1996). Quality and Assessment. Quality Assurance in Education.

(3), 3-10

Kartini Md Khalid. (1999). Investigating cloze test and c-test as test methods through test-takers' perspectives. Unpublished Masters dissertation, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Knight, P. (1995). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

Koo Yew Lie. (2004). Multicultural meaningmakers: Malaysian ways with words and the world. In P. Kell, S. Shore & M. Singh (Eds.), Adult Education @ 21st century. (pp.71-87), New York: Peter Lang.

Lee King Siong & Wong Fook Fei. (2000). Washback effects of a new test on teaching: A Malaysian perspective. STETS Language and Communication Review, 2, 11-18.

Lee King Siong. (2004). Exploring the connection between the testing of reading and literacy: the case of the MUET. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 4(1).

Lincoln, Y.S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 275-289.

McNamara, T. & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing:The social dimension. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Merriam, S.B. and associates. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Messick, S. J. (1980). Test validation and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012-1027

Messick, S. J. (1989). Validity. In R.L.Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed). (pp.13-103). New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan.

Messick, S.J. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 241-256.

Messick, S. J. (Ed) (1999). Assessment in higher education: issues of access, quality, student development, and public policy. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia. (2007). National Higher Education Action Plan 2007-2010: triggering higher education transformation.

Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation methods (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Rowntree, D. (1987). Assessing students: How shall we know them? London: Kogan Page.

Stake, R.E. (1994). Case study. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. (pp. 236-247), Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications Inc.

Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.

Tam, M. (2001). Measuring quality and performance in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 7(1), 47-54.

Universities and University Colleges Act, Malaysia. 1971. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021