EXAMINATION OF INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE DECISIONS CONCERNING INTERNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT

Salawati Mat Basir

Abstract


This article examines the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) role in the enforcement of international law, focusing on how its decisions influence state behaviour and broader compliance mechanism. This article conducts a critical examination of the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) jurisprudence to analyse the effectiveness and limitations of its decisions in the context of international law enforcement. This article also highlights that, despite the legal finality and binding nature of ICJ judgments, the absence of a standing enforcement body means that compliance often depends on complex diplomatic pressure, the political will of states, and the Court’s own perceived legitimacy. This article argues that while ICJ’S judicial function is vital for shaping and reinforcing international legal norms, its direct enforcement capacity is inherently limited by its consent-based jurisdiction and the political dynamics of global governance. It concludes by assessing whether current enforcement mechanisms are adequate for upholding global justice and offers recommendations for strengthening the practical impact of the Court’s ruling in an evolving international society.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Acer, Y. (2017). The Aegean maritime disputes and international law. London:Taylor & Francis.

Allain, J. (2017). International law in the Middle East: Closer to power than justice. London: Routledge.

Alter, K. J. (2020). The global spread of European style international courts. Special Issue on: From Europeanisation to Diffusion. London: Routledge.

Alvarez, E. (2017). The new dispute settlers:(half) truths and consequences. In the Globalization of International Law. London:Routledge.

Bodansky, D. (2017). The role of the international court of justice in addressing climate change: Some preliminary reflections. Arizona State University Law Journal, 49, 689-702.

Boyle, A. E., & Redgwell, C. (2021). International Law and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Charlesworth, H., & Chinkin, C. (2022). The boundaries of international law: A feminist analysis, with a new introduction. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Corten, O. (2021). The law against war: the prohibition on the use of force in contemporary international law. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Dinstein, Y. (2019). The international law of belligerent occupation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dolzer, R., Kriebaum, U., & Schreuer, C. (2022). Principles of international investment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunoff, J., Hakimi, M., Ratner, S. R., & Wippman, D. (2023). International Law: Norms, Actors, Process. New York:Aspen Publishing.

Eiriksson, G. (2021). The international tribunal for the law of the sea. London:Brill.

Hathaway, J. C. (2021). The rights of refugees under international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jennings, R. Y. (2017). The acquisition of territory in international law. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Orakhelashvili, A. (2022). Akehurst's modern introduction to international law. London:Routledge.

Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2017). The Court of Justice of the European Union and the politics of law. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Schmidt, S. K. (2018). The European Court of Justice and the policy process: The shadow of case law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Slagter, T. H., & Van Doorn, J. D. (2022). Fundamental perspectives on international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Voeten, E. (2020). Populism and backlashes against international courts. Perspectives on Politics, 18(2), 407-422.

Zimmermann, A., Tams, C. J., Oellers-Frahm, K., & Tomuschat, C. (2019). The Statute of the International Court of Justice: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

e-ISSN : 2550-1704