Analisis Bibliometrik Penerbitan Ilmiah Bahasa Melayu dalam Jurnal Berindeks Scopus

Fidlizan Bin Muhammad, Salwa Amirah Awang, Mohd Yahya Mohd Hussin, Azila Abdul Razak, Mohd Asri Mohd Noor

Abstract


Penerbitan ilmiah dalam bahasa Melayu berpotensi meningkatkan martabat bahasa dengan mengukuhkan peranannya sebagai medium utama ilmu pengetahuan dan memperluas pengaruhnya dalam bidang akademik dan profesional. Sehubungan itu, artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis penerbitan makalah bahasa Melayu yang diterbitkan oleh pengarang dengan afiliasi negara Malaysia yang diindeks dalam pangkalan data Scopus. Kajian ini mengaplikasi kata carian Malaysia sebagai afiliasi negara pengarang dan limitasi bahasa Melayu bagi mengumpulkan maklumat secara sistematik mengenai pengarang, artikel, jumlah sitasi, institusi, kata kunci dan lain-lain. Data kajian ini diekstrak daripada pangkalan data Scopus pada 27 September 2024. Bagi tujuan analisis, perisian biblioMagika berasaskan Microsoft Excel digunakan bagi tujuan analisis kekerapan, manakala Biblioshiny dan VOSviewer pula bagi tujuan pemvisualan data. Hasil analisis mendapati, penerbitan dalam bahasa Melayu mula diindeks ke dalam pangkalan data Scopus bermula tahun 1993. Sebanyak 2,160 dokumen dalam bahasa Melayu telah diindeks dalam pelbagai bidang melibatkan bidang Sains dan Sains Sosial. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) muncul sebagai institusi paling produktif melibatkan bilangan dokumen dan jumlah pengarang yang paling banyak. Analisis sitasi menunjukkan penerbitan bidang Sains dalam bahasa Melayu mendapat perhatian ramai pengkaji dengan rekod jumlah sitasi yang tinggi. Walaupun dokumen diterbitkan dalam bahasa Melayu, ia tidak menghalang pengarang di Malaysia untuk berkolaborasi dengan pengarang antarabangsa terutama dengan Indonesia, dan beberapa negara di Asia dan Eropah. Implikasi analisis bibliometrik ini menunjukkan bahawa
bahasa Melayu berupaya berfungsi sebagai bahasa ilmu dan penyelidikan yang berdaya saing di peringkat antarabangsa serta diiktiraf dalam pangkalan data seperti Scopus dan lain-lain.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmi, A. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis for Beginners-A starter guide to begin with a bibliometric study. Malaysia, No publisher.

Ahmi, A. (2024). biblioMagika, available from https://bibliomagika.com. Retrieved on September,15, 2024.

Alam, A., Fianto, B. A., Ratnasari, R. T., Ahmi, A., & Handayani, F. P. (2023). History and Development of Takaful Research: A Bibliometric Review. SAGE Open, 13(3),1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231184852

Alharthi, R.H., Nor Zafir, Md. S., Mazilah, A., Adnan, A., Faisal, F., & Roshazlizawati, M. N. (2023). Research trends, developments, and future perspectives in brand attitude: A bibliometric analysis utilizing the Scopus database (1944–2021). Heliyon, 9, e12765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12765.

Al Husaeni, D. F., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). Bibliometric using VOS viewer with publish or perish (using google scholar data): from step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of digital learning articles in pre and post COVID-19 pandemic. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.17509/ ajse.v2i1.37368

Altarawneh, M., Alhmood, M. A., Mansour, A. Z., & Ahmi, A. 2023. Comprehensive Bibliometric Mapping of Publication Trends in Earnings Management. Economic Studies (Ikonomicheski Izsledvania), 32(5),179-203.

Ardiansyah, W., Suparto, R.M. & Amri, P. (2024). Bibliometric analysis and visualization of state administrative law in Scopus database from 2017-20121. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2310935. https://doi.org/10.1080/23321886.2024.2310935.

Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.

Bontis, N., & Serenko, A. (2009). A follow-up ranking of academic journals. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 16-26. doi: 10.1108 /136732 709 109 31134

Chin, H., & Chew, C. M. (2021). Profiling the research landscape on electronic feedback in educational context from 1991 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(4), 551–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692- 021-00192-x

Di Bitetti, M.S., Ferreras, J.A. (2017). Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications. Ambio, 46, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0820-7

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res, 133, 285–296.

Effendy, F., Gaffar, V., Hurriyati, R., & Hendrayati, H. (2021). Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Penggunaan pembayaran Seluler Dengan vosviewer. Jurnal Interkom: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 16(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.35969/interkom.v16i1.92

Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2009). English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 1–6.

Huang, M. H. (2011). A comparison of three major academic rankings for world universities: From a research evaluation perspective. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9(1),1-25.

Jaafar, J. (2008). Cabaran Dan Proses Pemantapan Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pengajian Melayu, 19, 68-90.

Jeflea, F. V., Danciulescu, D., Sitnikov, C. S., Filipeanu, D., Park, J. O., & Tugui, A. (2022). Societal technological megatrends: A bibliometric analysis from 1982 to 2021. Sustainability, 14(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031543

Jeroen, B., Michiel, S., Andrew, P., Grégoire, C. & Reza, K. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019

Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2009). International engagement versus local commitment: Hong Kong academics in the humanities and social sciences writing for publication. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 279–293.

Liu, W. (2017). The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from Web of Science’s three journal citation indexes. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1089

López-Navarro, I., Moreno, A.I., Quintanilla, M.Á. et al. (2015). Why do I publish research articles in English instead of my own language? Differences in Spanish researchers’ motivations across scientific domains. Scientometrics, 103, 939–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1570-1

Meneghini, R., & Packer, A.L. (2007) Is there science beyond English? Embo reports, 8, 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400906

Meneghini, R., A.L. Packer, & L. Nassi-Calò. (2008). Articles by Latin American authors in prestigious journals have fewer citations. PLoS ONE, 3(11), e3804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003804.

Mohamad Salleh, S. & Saadah, J. (2015). Penerbitan Karya Kesusasteraan Melayu Di Penerbit Ukm. Jurnal Melayu, 14(1),17-31.

Mohd Khaidir, A.W. (2020). Konsep Usia atau Lama-Waktu Bahasa Melayu dalam Bidang Linguistik Sejarah dan Perbandingan. E-Jurnal Bahasa dan Linguistik, 2(1), 23-40.

Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. EPI SCP. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03.

Noraien, M. & Noor Rohana, M. (2015). Penerbitan Ilmiah Bahasa Melayu dalam Kalangan Ilmuwan Negara. Journal of Business and Social Development, 3(1), 25-32.

Orme, W.B. (1914). Mâkan Sîrih. Br Med J. 1, 325. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.2771.325-a

Öztürk, O., Kocaman, R. & Kanbach, D.K. (2024). How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00738-0.

Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation. 24, 348-349.

Reed, J.G. (1925). Smallpox inoculation amongst Dyaks of Sarawak. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 19(4), 265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0035-9203(25)80020-8

Roosfa, H. (2011). Perkembangan Jurnal Ilmiah Melayu dalam Kalangan Melayu Watan. Jurnal Melayu, 6, 137-152.

Salager-Meyer, F. (2014). Writing and publishing in peripheral scholarly journals: How to enhance the global influence of multilingual scholars? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13, 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.003.

Suraya, A., Noor Emilina, M. N., Syafiq, A.H.H., & Nur Syuhada, A. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis: Navigating Publication Trends in Academic Dishonesty in Higher Education. Akademika, 94(2), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2024-9402-24

Zahra, A. A., Nurmandi, A., Tenario, C. B., Rahayu, R., Benectitos, S. H., Mina, F. L. P., & Haictin, K. M. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of trends in theory-related policy publications. Emerging Science Journal, 5(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01261

Zamimah, O., & Nuraini, Y. (2019). Kajian Bibliometrik Penerbitan Berbahasa Melayu dalam Indeks Scopus. Seminar Antarabangsa Susastera, Bahasa Dan Budaya Nusantara (Sutera) 2019. Pusat Penyelidikan Langkawi UKM, 1-2 Ogos 2019.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694