Identiti Etnik Minoriti di Malaysia: Antara Realiti Sosial Tafsiran Autoriti dan Tafsiran Harian

Pue Giok Hun, Charanjit Kaur

Abstract


(Ethnic Minority Identity in Malaysia: Between Authority-defined and Everyday-defined Social Reality)

Questions of ethnicity and ethnic identity remain ardent in Malaysian community life. Despite having a high ethnic awareness, not many people recognize or fully understand other ethnic groups, particularly minority ethnic groups. This article has two purposes, namely to highlight two cases of minority ethnic identity in Malaysia and to examine the effect of social stereotyping on minority ethnic group’s interactions with the Malaysian public. By using Shamsul’s (1996) two social reality approach, a study was conducted on two ethnic minorities, namely the Peranakan Chinese of Kelantan and the Sikh Punjabi of Kuala Lumpur. The study found that the Kelantan Chinese Peranakan and Sikh Punjabi ethnic identities are very different from mainstream stereotypes associated with Chineseness or Indianness; Kelantan Peranakan Chinese identity, for example, is strongly influenced by elements of local culture, and the Sikh Punjabi identity is rooted in Sikh religious elements. Although living in two areas with different ethnic diversity indexes, it was found that both ethnic minority groups shared the mutual problems of mistaken identity and negative ethnonymic connotations. These problems were most often faced during interaction with the mainstream general public when outside of the respective ethnic minority’s immediate locality. These findings show that Malaysian society has only skin-deep awareness and knowledge about ethnic minority groups living within the country. This can be attributed in part to the overemphasis of ‘authority-defined’ perspective that traced back to colonial knowledge on, and methods of, managing ethnic diversity. Over time, this knowledge has become an accepted, pervasive and dominant social fact in the society.

Keywords: Ethnic identity; ethnic minority; Peranakan Chinese; Sikh Punjabi; social reality

Abstrak

Soal etnisiti dan identiti etnik kekal hangat dalam kancah kehidupan bermasyarakat di Malaysia. Walaupun mempunyai kesedaran etnik yang tinggi, tidak ramai yang mengenali atau mengetahui tentang kumpulan-kumpulan etnik lain, khususnya mengenai kumpulan-kumpulan etnik minoriti. Artikel ini mempunyai dua tujuan iaitu mengetengahkan dua kes identiti etnik minoriti di Malaysia dan mengkaji kesan stereotaip sosial kepada interaksi kumpulan etnik minoriti tersebut dengan masyarakat umum. Menggunakan pendekatan dua realiti sosial (Shamsul 1996), kajian dilakukan ke atas dua kumpulan etnik minoriti iaitu Cina Peranakan di Kelantan dan Punjabi Sikh di Kuala Lumpur. Kajian mendapati identiti etnik Cina Peranakan Kelantan dan Punjabi Sikh jauh berbeza daripada stereotaip yang dikaitkan dengan kecinaan dan keindiaan dalam arus perdana; identiti Cina Peranakan Kelantan misalnya, kuat dipengaruhi oleh elemen budaya tempatan manakala identiti Punjabi Sikh adalah bertunjangkan kepada elemen agama Sikh. Walaupun tinggal dalam dua kawasan yang mempunyai indeks kepelbagaian etnik yang berbeda, kedua-dua kumpulan etnik minoriti ini didapati menghadapi dua masalah sepunya iaitu salah identiti dan konotasi negatif dalam ethnonym. Masalah ini cenderung dihadapi dalam interaksi dengan golongan awam dalam arus perdana di luar lokaliti mereka. Dapatan kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa masyarakat di Malaysia mempunyai kesedaran dan pengetahuan yang cetek mengenai kumpulan etnik minoriti yang ada di negara ini. Ini dapat dikaitkan dengan penekanan kepada pendekatan ‘tafsiran autoriti’ yang disusul daripada ilmu dan cara kolonial dalam mengurus kepelbagaian etnik yang ada. Selepas suatu masa, pengetahuan ini menjadi fakta sosial yang diterima, berleluasa dan dominan dalam masyarakat tersebut.

Kata kunci: Identiti etnik; minoriti etnik; Cina Peranakan; Punjabi Sikh; realiti sosial

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/akad-2014-8401n2-05


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aloysius, M. 2013. Food identity and its pluralistic nature: Malaysian cuisine. Dlm. Menyelusuri cabaran kepelbagaian: Pengalaman Malaysia terkini, disunting oleh Pue Giok Hun, 272-295. Bangi: Institut Kajian Etnik.

Azrul Affandi Sobry. 2011. Misteri etnik: ‘Ambo Cino Kelate’. Berita Harian, 10 April.

Banton, M. 2011. A theory of social category. Sociology 45 (2): 187–201.

Barth, F., sunt. 1969. Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

Bunnell, T. 2002. Kampung rules: Landscape and the contested government of urban(e) Malayness. Urban Studies 39(9): 1685-1701.

Chin Yee Mun, Lee Yok Fee, Jayum Jawan, & Sarjit Singh Darshan. 2014. From individual choice to collective actions: ethnic consciousness in Malaysia reconsidered. Ethnic and Racial Studies. Doi: 10.1080/01419870.2013.863958. Tarikh capaian: 1 Julai 2014.

Chua Bee Seok, Jasmine Adela Mutang, Lailawati Madlan, Alfred Chan Huan Zhi, Asong Joseph, Ho Cheah Joo, Suwaibah Zakaria, Rosnah Ismail & Shamsul, A. B. 2013. The perception of characteristics, behaviors, cultures and traditions toward own and other ethnic groups. International Journal of Asian History, Culture and Tradition 1(1): 1-10.

DeBernardi, J. 2006. The way that lives in the heart: Chinese popular religion and spirit mediums in Penang, Malaysia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Evers, H.-D. 2012. Spatial ethnic diversity patterns in Malaysia: what can we learn from bio-diversity research? ISA eSymposium for Sociology, 1-10.

Faisal Ibrahim, Norhayati Abdul Manaf, Thong, L. K., Ezhar Tamam, Khairul Hilmi & Zalina Darman. 2010. Re-visiting Malay stereotypes: a case study among Malaysian and Indonesian Chinese students. SEGi Review 3(2): 153-163.

Farah Azalea Mohamed Al Amin. 2008. Controversies surrounding Malaysian independent female director Yasmin Ahmad’s first film, Sepet. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di 17th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia, 1-3 Julai, Melbourne.

Furnivall, J.S. 1983. Netherlands India: a study of plural economy. New York: AMS Press.

Gill Darshan Singh. 2009. Sikh community in Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: MPH Group Publishing. Gordon, M. M. 1964. Assimilation in American life. New York: Oxford University.

Guru Granth Sahib.

Hanapi Dollah. 1986. Asimilasi budaya: kajian kes komuniti Cina di Kelantan. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Hariati Azizan. 2011. Ignorance is not bliss. The Star, 23 Januari.

Hirschman, C. 1987. The meaning and measurement of ethnicity in Malaysia: an analysis of census classifications. Journal of Asian Studies 46(3): 555-582.

Hirschman, C. 2013. Measurement and meaning of race and ethnicity in Malaysia: an update? Syarahan umum anjuran Universiti Malaya, 2 Mei, Kuala Lumpur.

Holst, F. 2012. Ethnicization and identity construction in Malaysia. London: Routledge. Ismail Sualman. 1998. Fenomena stereotaip: kesannya ke atas komunikasi. Shah Alam: Institut Teknologi Mara.

Jenkins, R. 2000. Categorization: Identity, social process and epistemology. Current Sociology 48(3): 7-25.

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 2011. Surat pekeliling ikhtisas bilangan 3 tahun 2011: Peraturan berkenaan rambut dan pemakaian steel bangle (kara) oleh murid-murid keturunan Sikh. http://www.moe.gov.my/upload/galeri_awam/pekeliling/1307690205.pdfTarikh capaian: 4 Ogos 2014.

Kua Kia Soong. Sunt. 1987. Defining Malaysian culture. Petaling Jaya: K. Das Ink.

Malkiat Singh & Mukhtiar Kaur Sandhu. 1971. Some Sikh culture, customs and tradisions in Malaya. Pulau Pinang: Lopo Ghar.

Manjit Singh Sindhu. 1991. Sikhs in Malaysia. Melaka: Sant Sohan Singh Ji Malacca Memorial Society.

Mansor Mohd. Noor. 2012. Kerencaman sosial dan penipisan batas etnik: kepelbagaian etnik dan perkongsian hidup bersama di Malaysia. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Merdeka Center. 2013a. Public Opinion Survey 2013: Peninsular Malaysia Voter Survey. http://www.merdeka.org/v4/phocadownload/ R e s e a r c h e s / 1 2 a % 2 0 n a t i o n a l % 2 0 p o l l %

%20press%20release%20slides%20final.pdf. Tarikh capaian: 19 Mei 2014.

Merdeka Center. 2013b. Peninsular Malaysia Voter Survey: Issues of Voter Concern, December 28, 2012. http://www.merdeka.org/v4/phocadownload/Researches/poll%20release%20dec%202012%20 %20voter%20issues.pdf. Tarikh capaian: 19 Mei 2014.

Miles, R., & Brown, M. 2003. Racism. New York: Rutledge.

Mohd. Ghazali Abdullah. 2003. Keunikan budaya Kelantan dalam perpaduan kaum Cina, Melayu dan Siam dari perspektif bahasa dan budaya. Dlm. Peradaban Melayu Timur Laut, disunting oleh A. Aziz Deraman, 76-89. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Pue Giok Hun. 2009. On being Peranakan Chinese of Kelantan: embodiment and mistaken ethnic identity. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Southeast Asia Psychology Conference, 10 Julai, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.

Riggs, F.W. 1988. The Intercocta manual: towards an international encyclopedia of social science terms. Paris: UNESCO.

Samovar, L.A., Porter, R.E. & McDaniel, E.R. 2010. Communication between cultures. Edisi Ketujuh. Boston: Wadsworth.

Sarjit Singh. 1999. Diaspora dan masalah identiti Sikh di Malaysia. Akademika 56: 183-192.

Shamsul, A. B. 2001. ‘Malay’ and ‘Malayness’ in Malaysia reconsidered: a critical review. Communal/Plural 9(1): 69-80.

Shamsul, A. B. 2006. Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’. Dlm. Inter-ethnic relations in Malaysia: selected readings, disunting oleh Jayum A. Jawan & Zaid Ahmad, 118-139. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.

Shamsul, A. B. 2014. Perpaduan, kesepaduan dan penyatupaduan: satu negara, satu kata akar, tiga konsep keramat. Ucapan dasar pada Persidangan Pemantapan Citra Kenegaraan: Perkongsian Pengalaman di Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 19-21 Januari, Bangi.

Shamsul, A.B. Sunt. 2012. Modul hubungan etnik. Edisi Kedua. Bangi: Institut Kajian Etnik.

Shamsul, A.B. 1996. Debating about identity in Malaysia: A discourse analysis. Southeast Asian Studies 34(3): 476-499.

Shamsul, A.B. 1999. Identity contestation in Malaysia: A comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’. Akademika 55: 17-37.

Shutz, A. & Luckman, T. 1983. The structures of the life-world. Jil. ke-2. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Tan Chee Beng. 1982. Peranakan Chinese in northeast Kelantan with special reference to Chinese religion. JMBRAS 55: 26-52.

Tan Chee Beng. 2005. Chinese in Malaysia. Encyclopedia of Diasporas: Immigrant and refugee cultures around the world, disunting oleh Ember, M., Ember, C.R. & Skoggard, I., 697-705. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Taylor, C. 1994. The politics of recognition. Dlm. Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition, disunting oleh Guttmann, A., 25-74. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Teo Kok Seong. 2003. The Peranakan Chinese of Kelantan: A study of the culture, language and communication of an assimilated group in Malaysia. London: Asean Academic Press.

Tong Chee Kiong. 2006. The Chinese in contemporary Malaysia. Dlm. Race, ethnicity and the state in Malaysia and Singapore, disunting oleh Lian, K. F., 95-119. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.

Winzeler, R.L. 1983. The ethnic status of the Rural Chinese of the Kelantan Plain. Dlm. The Chinese in Southeast Asia: Identity, culture and politics, disunting oleh Gosling, P. & Lim, L.Y.C., 34-55. Singapura: Maruzen Asia.

Zaki Samsudin. 2010. Menangani prejudis dan stereotaip negatif kaum. Centre for Policy Initiatives. http://www.cpiasia.net/v3/index.php/219-contributorssp-642/contributors/1848-menangani-prejudisand-

stereotaip-negatif-kaum-. Tarikh capaian: 11 Julai 2014.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694