Ethnic-based Digital Divide and Internet Use Amongst Malaysian Students

Patrick C H Soh (Multimedia University, chinhooi8@gmail.com), Kok Wai Chew (Multimedia University), Chettiar Arumugan Veeri (Multimedia University), Peng Hwa Ang (Nanyang Technological University)

Abstract


Research had documented the existence of a digital divide not only on the basis of income, but also ethnicity. The issue of ethnicity has always been of paramount importance in Malaysia ever since its birth as a nation. With more than 90 percent of urban youths in Malaysia accessing the Internet, one would not expect to find any ethnic-based differences in digital divide amongst these youths. This study verifies whether any ethnic-based differences in digital divide exist amongst urban school-going youths in Malaysia with and without controlling income levels. A random survey among 959 students from two of the most developed states in Malaysia, Penang, and Federal Territory (Kuala Lumpur) was undertaken. Statistical analysis indicates significant ethnic-based differences exist with regard home personal computer ownership and Internet connection, even with household income accounted for. However, these differences were bridged through alternative places for Internet access like cyber cafés, schools and homes of friends and relatives. This study finds that there are no significant differences in the Internet penetration rate amongst the main three ethnic groups. Nevertheless, there are concerns that a new digital divide could be opening, one that is based on the quantity and quality of access. The data reveals that Chinese youths are online for twice the duration of Malays and Indians. Higher Internet usage may not necessarily be positive as they are intertwined with higher risks and negative activities such as violent games, pornography, and gambling. The article also discusses various means to mitigate the risks of Internet usage.

Keywords: Internet, Malaysia, digital divide, race, students

ABSTRAK

Kajian telah menunjukkan bahawa bukan sahaja terdapat jurang digital berdasarkan pendapatan, tetapi juga berdasarkan etnik. Isu etnik adalah penting semenjak kelahiran negara Malaysia. Oleh kerana lebih daripada 90 peratus remaja yang tinggal di bandar mempunyai kemudahan Internet, adalah dijangkakan bahawa tidak terdapat perbezaan etnik dari segi jurang digital dalam kalangan mereka. Kajian ini dijalankan untuk mengetahui sama ada terdapat jurang digital berdasarkan etnik dalam kalangan remaja bandar di Malaysia setelah mengambil kira pendapatan isi rumah. Satu soal selidik telah ditadbirkan secara rawak ke atas 959 pelajar sekolah daripada dua negeri termaju di Malaysia, iaitu Pulau Pinang dan Wilayah Persekutuan (Kuala Lumpur). Hasil kajian menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan ketara di antara etnik dari segi pemilikan komputer peribadi di rumah and jenis sambungan Internet. Bagaimanapun, kesan perbezaan ini telah dikurangkan melalui kemudahan Internet di kafe siber, sekolah, rumah kawan dan saudara-mara. Kajian ini juga menunjukkan bahawa tidak terdapat perbezaan di antara tiga etnik utama dari segi penggunaan Internet. Terdapat jurang digital berdasarkan jumlah dan kualiti penggunaan Internet. Data menunjukkan bahawa remaja Cina menggunakan Internet dua kali lebih lama jika dibandingkan dengan remaja Melayu dan India. Walau bagaimanapun, penggunaan Internet yang lebih lama tidak semestinya positif kerana merangkumi risiko dan aktiviti negatif seperti permainan Internet yang bersifat ganas, menonton gambar lucah dan perjudian. Artikel ini juga membincangkan cara-cara untuk mengurangkan risiko penggunaan Internet.

Kata kunci: Internet, Malaysia, jurang digital, etnik, pelajar


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, F. 1997. Affirmative Action Policy in Malaysia: To Restructure Society, To Eradicate Poverty. International Centre for Ethnic Studies.

Agence France-Presse (AFP). 2009. South Korea Unveils Steps to Stop Internet-Linked Suicides, in AsiaOne. Singapore.

Anderson, R. et al. 1995. Universal Access of E-Mail: Feasibility and Societal Implications. Rand Corp.: Santa

Monica, California.

Anand, S. 1983. Inequality and Poverty Measurement in Malaysia: Measurement and Decomposition. World Bank Research.

Choi, Y.J. 2001 Investigating Koreans’ Internet Use Patterns

and Motivations, and Exploring Vulnerability of Internet Dependency, in Graduate School. The University of Southern Mississippi.

Chong, E. 2008. Underage Girl Pregnant After Sex with Man on Sentosa beach. The Strait Times. Singapore.

Cooper, J. 2006. The Digital Divide: The Special Case of Gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22: 320-334.

Colletta, N.J., Lim T.G. & Kelles-Viitanen, A. 2001. Social Cohesion and Conflict Prevention in Asia: Managing Diversity Through Development. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

Crouch, H. 2001. Managing Ethnic Tensions Through Affirmative Action: The Malaysian Experience. In Social Cohesion and Conflict Prevention in Asia: Managing Diversity Through Development. Colletta N.J., Lim T.G., & Kelles-Viitanen, A. (eds.). World Bank: Washington, D.C.

Department of Statistics Malaysia. Population (Updated 31/07/2009). 2009 [cited 2009 15th Oct 2009]; Available from: http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/index. php?option=com_content&view=article&id=50%3Apopu lation&catid=38%3Akaystats&Itemid=11〈=en.

Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2000. Census of Population and Housing Malaysia 2000. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Statistics.

Finkelhor, D., Mitchell K.J., & Wolak, J., On-line Victimization: A Report on the Nations’ Youth. 2000, National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, 699 Prince Street, Alexandra VA: Alexandra VA.

Finkelhor, D., Mitchell K.J., & Wood, J. Highlights of the Youth Internet Safety Survey. 2001. U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC. G8. 2000. Okinawa Charter on Global Information Society.

Hara, F. 1991. Malaysia’s New Economic Policy and the Chinese Business Community. The Developing Economies, XXIX.

Hart, G. 1994. The New Economic Policy and Redistribution in Malaysia: A Model for Post-Apartheid South Africa Transformation 23: 44-59.

Healy, J.M. 1998. Failure to Connect: How Computers Affect Our Children’s Minds: For Better or Worse. The Phi Delta Kappan 81(5): 1-11.

Hoffman, D.L., Novak T.P., & Schlosser, A. 2000. The Evolution of the Digital Divide: How Gaps in Internet Access May Impact Electronic Commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5(3).

Hoffman, D. L. & Novak, T. P. 1998. Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet. Science 280: 390-391.

Jackson, L.A., et al. 2006. Does Home Internet Use Influence the Academic Performance of Low-Income Children? Development Psychology 42(3): 429-434.

Jackson, L.A., et al. 2006. Children’s Home Internet Use: Antecedents and Psychological, Social and Academic Consequences. In Computers, Phones, and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology. R.E. Kraut, Brynin M., & Kiesler S. (eds.). Oxford University Press: New York.

Jackson, L.A., et al. 2001. The Racial Digital Divide: Motivational, Affective, and Cognitive Correlates of Internet Use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31(10): 2019-2046.

Jackson, L.A., 2008. Adolescents and the Internet, in The Changing Portrayal Of American Youth In Popular Media. Oxford University Press: New York.

Jackson, M., 2007. Exploring Gender, Feminism and Technology from a Communication Perspective: An Introduction and Commentary. Women’s Studies in Communication 30(2): 149-156.

Jones, S., Johnson-Yale C. & Millermaier, S., 2009. U.S.

College Students’ Internet Use: Race, Gender and Digital Divides. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14: 244-264.

Koss, F.A. 2001. Children Falling Into Digital Divide. Journal of International Affairs 55(1): 75-90.

Khoo, A. Lim C.P. & Williams, M. 2001. Parents and Children’s Perceptions of the Dangers of the Internet. Australian Association for Research in Education.

Kraus, S.W. & Russell, B. 2008. Early Sexual Experiences: The Role of Internet Access and Sexually Explicit Material. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 11(2): 162-168.

Lee, M. 2007. China Clamps Down On Teenage Internet Gamin. Singapore: Asiaone.

Liau, A.K., Khoo A. & Ang, P.H. 2005. Factors Influencing Adolescents’ Engagement in Risky Internet Behavior. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 8(6): 513-520.

Livingstone, S. & Bober, M. 2005. UK Children Go Online. Department of Media and Communications. The London School of Economics and Political Science: London.

Malaysia Economic Planning Unit. 2006. Eighth Malaysia Plan. Malaysia Economic Planning Unit, KL, Malaysia.

Malaysia Economic Planning Unit. 2006. Ninth Malaysia Plan, Malaysia Economic Planning Unit KL, Malaysia.

Malaysia Economic Planning Unit. 2010. Tenth Malaysia Plan 2011-2015. Malaysia Economic Planning Unit: KL, Malaysia.

Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission. 2008. Household Use of the Internet Survey 2008. Cyberjaya: Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission.

Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor D. & Wood, K. 2003. The Exposure of Youth to Unwanted Sexual Material on the Internet: A National Survey of Risk, Impact, and Prevention. Youth & Society 34 (3): 330 - 358.

Mullis, R.L., Mullis, A.K., & Cornille, T.A. 2007. Relationships between Identity Formation and Computer Use Among Black and White Emerging Adult Females. Computers in Human Behavior 23: 415-423.

Nie, N.H. & Erbring, L. 2000. Internet and Society. Q.S.o. Society, Editor. Standford: Stanford University.

OECD, 2001. Understanding the Digital Divide. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Paris.

Roberts, D., Foehr, U. & Rideout, V. 2004. Kids and Media in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Reuters. 2007. Internet Blamed for Shanghai Teen Pregnancies. Beijing: Reuters.

Selwyn, N. 2004. Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide. New Media & Society 6: 341-362.

Soh, P.C.H., Chew, K.W. & Ang, P.H. 2008. Internet Usage and Addiction Amongst Urban Youths in Malaysia. The International Conference on Communication and Media 2008. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Subrahmanyam, K. et al. 2001. The Impact of Computer Use on Children’s and Adolescents’ Development. Applied Developmental Psychology 22:7-30.

The Sun. 2008. Suicide Sites to be Investigated. UK: London, UK.

The Star. 2008. May 13, 1969: Truth and Reconciliation. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

The Star. 2009. China Closes Down 1,250 Sites in Online Porn Crackdown. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

The New Paper. 2009. Singapore’s Brazen Buayas. Singapore.

The Nation. A. 2008. Kids Imitating Sex Acts Seen on Web Arrested. [cited 2008 29/4/2008]; Available from: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/breakingnews/read.php?newsid=30071609.

The Straits Times. 2009. Rise in Teen Sex? Blame the Internet, Says Experts. Singapore.

United Nations. 2007. World Summit on the Information Society. [cited 2007 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.itu.int/ wsis/basic/about.html.

USC ASCDF. 2005. The Digital Future Report 2005: Surveying the Digital Future: Year Five. University of Southern California: Los Angeles.

Young, J.R. 1998. Students are Unusually Vulnerable to Internet Addiction, Article Says. The Chronicle of Higher Education 44(22): A25.

Young, K.S.1996. Internet Addiction: The Emergence of A New Clinical Disorder. 104th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Zamaria, C. & Fletcher, F. 2007. Canada Online: Year Two Highlights, 2007. Canada Internet Project.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694