Keberkesanan Program Bandar Selamat: Persepsi Komuniti di Bandar Kulaijaya, Malaysia (The Effectiveness of Safe City Program: Community perceptions in Kulaijaya, Malaysia)

MOHD FAREED (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, fareed.ukm@gmail.com), MOHD YUSOF HUSSAIN (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, hmyusoff@ukm.my)

Abstract


Safe City Program is the approach used in most cities in Malaysia to overcome the problem of escalating crime in urban areas. This program focuses on the implementation of 15 measures of crime prevention through environmental design strategies, empowering the safe city of the target area, and the strategies of management, community involvement and public awareness. The city of Kulaijaya under the Kulai Municipal Council (MPKu) has implemented this program since 2004. Implementation of the Safe City Program provides relief to everyone, especially to the urban community of MPKu. However, the crime statistics index released by the Royal Malaysian Police (RMP) for the years 2005 to 2009, show that crime rate in Kulaijaya was at an alarming rate. The question lies weather 15 measures of crime prevention in Safe City Program can reduce the crime in the city? Therefore, this study aims to identify the effectiveness of the Safe City Program conducted in the city of Kulaijaya. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Safe City Program is based on community perceptions. Questionnaires were used to obtain community perceptions on the effectiveness of Safe City Program, where 278 questionnaires were distributed. The study found out that some of the crime prevention measures in Safe City Program are not effective in reducing the crime problem in this city. The problem that was detected and indirectly obtained from this study is the existence of gambling premises which operate openly in most of the shopping mall in this city.

Keywords: Safe city program; crime prevention; urban; community; perception

ABSTRAK

Program Bandar Selamat merupakan pendekatan yang digunakan di kebanyakan bandar di Malaysia bagi mengatasi masalah peningkatan jenayah di kawasan bandar. Program Bandar Selamat memberi tumpuan kepada pelaksanaan 15 langkah pencegahan jenayah melalui tiga strategi utama iaitu strategi mereka bentuk persekitaran fizikal, strategi memperkasakan kawasan sasaran serta strategi pengurusan, penyertaan komuniti dan kesedaran awam. Bandar Kulaijaya iaitu di bawah pentadbiran Majlis Perbandaran Kulai (MPKu) turut melaksanakan program ini sejak tahun 2004. Pelaksanaan Program Bandar Selamat ini seharusnya memberi kelegaan kepada semua pihak terutamanya kepada komuniti bandar rentetan usaha MPKu dalam mencegah kegiatan jenayah. Namun, perangkaan jenayah indeks yang dikeluarkan oleh Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) bagi tahun 2005 hingga 2009, menunjukkan kadar jenayah di Kulaijaya adalah pada tahap yang membimbangkan. Persoalan yang ingin dirungkaikan adalah sejauh manakah 15 langkah pencegahan jenayah Program Bandar Selamat berkesan dalam mengurangkan masalah jenayah di bandar ini? Justeru itu, artikel ini bertujuan mengenal pasti keberkesanan Program Bandar Selamat yang dijalankan di bandar Kulaijaya. Penilaian terhadap keberkesanan Program Bandar Selamat adalah berdasarkan kepada persepsi komuniti Kulaijaya. Instrumen borang kaji selidik digunakan bagi mendapatkan persepsi komuniti terhadap keberkesanan program tersebut dengan melibatkan 278 edaran borang kaji selidik. Hasil kajian mendapati terdapat beberapa langkah pencegahan jenayah Program Bandar Selamat yang tidak berkesan dalam mengurangi masalah jenayah di Kulaijaya. Masalah serius yang dapat dikesan dan diperoleh secara tidak langsung daripada kajian ini adalah berkenaan lambakan pusat perjudian yang beroperasi secara terbuka di kebanyakan pusat membeli-belah di bandar ini.

Kata kunci: Program bandar selamat; pencegahan jenayah; komuniti; bandar; persepsi



Full Text:

PDF

References


Alain, J. R. A. 1999. Urban Development and New Town in the Third World. London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

Ambe, N .J. 2003. Urbanization and development in sub-Sahara Africa. Journal of Cities 20(3): 167- 174.

Ayres, R. L. 1998. Crime and Violence as Development Issues in Latin America and the Caribbean. United States: World Bank.

Bailey, K. D. 1994. Methods of Social Research. Ed. ke-

New York: MacMillan Publishing.

Brantingham, P. J. & Faust, F. L. 1976. A conceptual

model of crime prevention. Journal of Crime and

Delinquency 22(3): 284-296.

Bennett, T., Holloway, K. & Farrington, D. 2008. The

Effectiveness of Neighborhood Watch. University of Glamorgan, UK: The Campbell Collaboration.

Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S. & Smith, G. 1985. Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. Oxford: Butterworth Helnemann Ltd.

Bruno, H. R. F., Mills, John, F. M. & Maria Tereza, L. F. 2005. Resources that drive performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54(5): 340-354.

Clark, D. 1982. Urban Geography: An Introduction Guide. London: Billing & Sons.

Clarke, R. V. 1992. Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. New York: Harrow & Heston.

Cozens, P.M., Hillier, D. & Prescott, G. 2001. Crime and the Design of Residential Property-Exploring the Theoretical Background (Part 1). Journal of Property Management 19 (2): 136-164.

Cozens, P.M. 2002. Sustainable urban development and crime prevention through environmental design for the British city. Towards an effective urban environmentalism for the 21st century. Journal of Cities 19(2): 129-137.

Cozens, P. M., Saville, G. & Hillier, D. 2005. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED): A review and modern bibliography. Journal of Property Management. 23(5): 328-344.

Douglas, D.P., Abraham, W., Richard, C.R. & Ralph, B.T. 2005. The physical environment of street crime: Defensible space, territoriality and incivilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13(1): 29-49

Edmund, F.M., Natalie, K.H., Timothy, S.B., Heather, P. & Karie, G. 2011. Project Safe Neighborhoods Case Study: Promising Violence Reduction Initiatives. Michigan: Michigan State University.

Ewing, R. & Dumbaugh, E. 2009. The built environment and traffic safety: A review of empirical evidence. Journal of Planning Literature 23(4): 347-367.

Herbert, D.T. 1982. Geography of Urban Crime New York: Longman.

Herries, K.D. 1974. The Geography of Crime and Justice. New York: McGraw Hill.

Jacobsen, P.L. 2003. Safety in numbers: More walkers and bicyclists, safety walking and bicycling. Injury Prevention 9(3): 205-209.

Jeffrey, C. 1972. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Joseph, F.S. 1987. Exploring Crime: Reading in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Florence, KY: Wadsworth Inc.

Kamalruddin Shamsudin. 2006. Pencapaian Perlaksanaan Program Bandar Selamat Bandaraya Shah Alam. Kertas Kerja Seminar Kebangsaan Pengurusan Bandar. Majlis Bandaraya Shah Alam: Subang Jaya, 4-5 September.

Kamaruddin, N. 1993. Peraturan dan Kawalan Guna Tanah Bandar. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Knox, P. & Mccarthy, L. 1992. Urbanization: An Introduction to Urban Geography. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Krejeie, R. V. & Morgan, D. V. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30: 607-610.

Kylie, E. 1997. A Safe City is a Happy City. Toronto: Green Edition.

Lab, S. P. 1988. Crime Prevention: Approaches, Practices and Evaluations. Cincinnati, Ohio: Anderson Publishing.

Marshall, W. & Garrick, N. 2010. Considering the role of the street network in road safety: A case study of 24 California cities. Urban Design International Journal 15(3):133-147.

Mawson, J. 2002. Neighborhood renewal and urban policy: A comparison of new approaches in England and France. Regional Studies 36(3): 691-707.

Nancy, G., Colleen. & Samantha, S. H. 2009. Evaluation of Target’s Safe City Initiative: Implementing Public-Private Partnerships to Address Crime in Retail Setting. United States: Urban Institute.

Nor-Ina Kanyo & Norizam Hj. Md Noor. 2007. Jenayah dan Perbandaran: Satu kajian di Daerah Timur Laut Pulau Pinang. Kertas kerja Seminar Kebangsaan Geografi 2007 “Dunia Tanpa Sempadan”. Anjuran Jabatan Geografi Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan dengan kerjasama Persatuan Geografi Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, 10-11 September 2007.

Oscar Newman. 1971. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. New York: MacMillan Publishing.

Pain, R. & Townsend, T. 2002. A safer city centre for all? Sense of community safety in Newcastle Upon Tyne. Geoforum 33:105-119.

Palen, J. J. 2008. The Urban World. Edisi kelapan. New York: McGraw Hill.

Paulsen, D. J. & Robinson, M. B. 2004. Spatial Aspects of Crime: Theory and Practice. Boston: Pearson Education.

Pokhariyal, G.P. & Muthuri, R. K. 2003. Strategic measures to curb crime rates in Nairobi. International Journal on World Peace 20(1) 55-69.

Rogers, J. D. 1989. Theories of crime and development: An historical perspective. Journal of Development Studies 25: 314-328.

Stephen, W. B. 2003. Self-control, social consequences, and criminal behavior: Street youth and the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 40(4): 403-425.

Siegel, L. J. 2002. Criminology the Core. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

Tim Hope. 1994. Community crime prevention: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Timothy, D. C. 1991. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Florida State University: National Crime Prevention Institute.

UN-Habitat. 2007. Strategic Plan for Safer Cities 2008- 2013: Promoting Just and Safe Cities for All. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.

Walmsely, D. J. 1988. Urban Living: The Individual in the City. New York: Wiley.

Walmsley, D. J. & Lewis, G. J. 1993. People and Environment: Behavioural approaches in Human Geography. Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical.

Wesley, E. M. & Norman, W. G. 2011. Evidence on why bike-friendly cities are safer for all road users. Environmental Practice 13: 16-27.

Yuen, B. 2004. Safety and dwelling in Singapore. Journal of Cities 21(1):19-28.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694