Cause-related marketing: Will religious consumers buy? (Hubungkait Penyebab Pemasaran: Adakah pengguna yang akan beli?)

Suzana Md Samsudi

Abstract


To meet the UN Sustainable Consumption and Production goal, more companies are integrating sustainability value through corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities as part of their marketing strategies. To highlight the CSR activities and sustainable development, the marketing strategies may change the focus from consumer to social framework such as from customer price discounts to corporate sponsorship or cause-related marketing (CRM). The question remains whether sponsorship or CRM carried out by corporate are perceived as being more socially responsible especially by the religious consumers. This study assesses the influence of religiosity on attitude towards CRM and purchase intention for brands supporting religious, social or environmental causes.  A conceptual model with a multi-dimensional construct of religiosity was developed to examine the relationship between religiosity and attitudes towards CRM and purchase intent. A survey among young Muslim adults in Malaysia was carried out to test the influence of religiosity on CRM and purchase intention. The results revealed contradicting support between intra- and inter-personal religiosity. Theoretically, the findings warrant additional research that focuses on the multi-dimensional construct of religiosity and its linkage to CRM as an incentive mechanism. While CRM activities are viewed positively by those who are religious in a more socially manner, those who are inwardly religious however, may reject and perceive the marketing approach negatively.

 

Keywords: Religiosity; cause-related marketing; Islam; consumer; sustainable development

 

Abstract 


Bagi memenuhi matlamat Penggunaan dan Pengeluaran Lestari PBB, lebih banyak syarikat mengintegrasi nilai kemapanan melalui aktiviti tanggungjawab sosial korporat (CSR) sebagai sebahastractgian daripada strategi pemasaran mereka. Untuk mengetengahkan aktiviti CSR dan pembangunan lestari, strategi pemasaran perlu mengubah fokus daripada kerangka pengguna kepada sosial, misalnya daripada harga diskaun pelanggan kepada penajaan korporat atau pemasaran berkait sosial (CRM). Sama ada penajaan atau CRM yang dijalankan oleh korporat dianggap sebagai lebih memenuhi tanggungjawab sosial oleh pengguna beragama terus menjadi persoalan. Justeru kajian ini menilai pengaruh keagamaan terhadap CRM dan niat pembelian bagi jenama yang menyokong program pembangunan agama, sosial atau alam sekitar. Model yang berkonsepkan multi-dimensi  keagamaan telah dibangunkan untuk mengkaji hubungan di antara tingkat keagamaan, persepsi terhadap CRM dan niat pembelian. Satu kaji selidik di kalangan golongan muda Muslim di Malaysia telah dijalankan untuk menguji pengaruh keagamaan terhadap CRM dan niat pembelian. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan sokongan yang bertentangan antara dimensi keagamaan peribadi dan dimensi keagamaan sosial. Secara teori, kajian ini mencadangkan penyelidikan lanjut terhadap pengukuran keagamaan multi-dimensi dan mengkaji hubungannya dengan CRM sebagai insentif pembelian. Walaupun aktiviti CRM dilihat secara positif oleh Muslim yang tinggi keagamaan dari dimensi sosial, Muslim yang tinggi keagamaan dari dimensi peribadi berkemungkinan menolak pembelian serta mempunyai persepsi negatif terhadap strategi pemasaran CRM.

 

Kata Kunci: Keagamaan; pemasaran berkait social; Islam; pengguna; pembangunan mampan


Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, M. W. 2008. The direct and indirect influences of human values on consumer choices. Doctoral thesis, School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington.

Allport, G. W. 1950. The individual and his religion. New York, Macmillan.

Al-Makaty, S. S., G. N. V. Tubergen, S. S. Whitlow& D. A. Boyd. 1996. Attitudes toward advertising in Islam. Journal of Advertising Research (36): 16-26.

Arora, N. & T. Handerson 2007. Embedded premium promotion: Why it works and how to make it more effective. Marketing Science 26(4): 514-531.

Bahr, H. M., L. F. Barter & B. A. Chadwick 1971. Orthodoxy, activism and the salience of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 10(2): 69-75.

Barnes, N. & D. Fitzgerald 1992. Strategic marketing for charitable organizations. Helath Marketing Quarterly 9(3/4): 103-114.

Basset, R. L., R. D. Sadler, E. E. Kobischen, D. M. Skiff, I. J. Merrill, B. J. Atwater, and P. W. Livermore. 1981. The Shcharitableherd Scale: Scharitablearating the shecharitable from goats. Journal of Psychology and Theology (9): 335-351.

Batson, C. D. 1976. Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (15): 29-45.

Batson, C. D., S. H. Eidelman, S. L. Higley& S. A. Russell. 2001). And who is my neighbour II: Quest religion as a source of universal compassion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (40): 9-50.

Batson, C. D., R. B. Floyd, J. M. Meyer & A. L. Winner 1999. And who is my neighbour? Intrinsic religion as a source for universal compassion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (38): 445-457.

Batson, C. D., P. A. Schoenrade, and W. L. Ventis. 1993. Religion and individual. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Benson, P. L., M. J. Donahue & J. A. Erickson. 1993. The Faith Maturity Scale: Conccharitabletualization, measurement and empirical validation. In M. L. Lynn and D. O. Moberg (Eds.). Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion (5): 1-26). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Bergan, A. (2001). Religiosity and life satisfaction. Activities, Adaptation and Aging 24(3): 23-34.

Brammer, S., G. Williams & J. Zinkin 2005. Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Centre for Business Organisations and Society, School of Management, University of Bath.

Brewer, G. A. 2003. Building social capital: Civic attitudes and behaviour of public servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(1): 7-10.

Brooks, A. C. 2007. The culture of charity: An interview with Arthur C. Brooks. Religion and Liberty 17(2): 12-13.

Brown, T. J. & P. A. Dacin. 1997. The company and the product: Corporation associations and consumer producer responses. Journal of Marketing 61(1): 68-84.

Chang, C.-T. 2008. To donate or not to donate? Product characteristics and framing effects of cause-related marketing on consumer purchase behavior. Psychology and Marketing 25(12): 1089-1110.

Clark, C. A. & J. E. L. Worthington. 1987. Family variables affecting the transmission of religious values from parents to adolescents: A review. Family Perspective (20): 1-21.

Dahl, D. W. & A. Lavack. 1995. Cause-related marketing: Impact of size of corporate donations and size of cause-related promotion on consumer perccharitabletions and participation. In American Marketing Association Winter Educators Conference: Marketing theory and applications. Chicago, American Marketing Association.

Davidson, J. D. & G. J. Quinn. 1976. Theological and sociological uses of the conccharitablet "orthodoxy." Review of Religious Research (18): 74-80.

Delener, N. 1990. The effect of religious factors on perceived risks in durable goods purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Marketing 7(3): 27-38.

Delener, N. 1990. An examination of the religious influences as predictors of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Midwest Marketing (5): 167-178.

Delener, N. 1994. Religious contrasts in consumer decision behavior patterns: Their dimensions and marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing 28(5), pp. 36-53.

Drumwright, M. 1996. Company advertising with a social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria. Journal of Marketing 60(4): 71-87.

Eckert, R. M. & D. Lester. 1997. Altruism and religiosity. Psychological Rcharitableorts (81): 562-567.

Ellen, P. S., L. A. Mohr & D. J. Webb. 2000. Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? Journal of Retailing 76(3): 393-406.

Essoo, N. & S. Dibb. 2004. Religious influence on shopping behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Management 20(7/8): 683-712.

Fam, K. S., D. S. Waller, & B. Z. Erdogan. 2004. The influence of religion on attitudes towards the advertising of controversial products. European Journal of Marketing 38(5/6): 537-555.

Fazio, R. H. 1989. On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessability. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler and A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .

Frydman, M., L. Ledruc, V. Hofmans & C. Molinier. 1995. The development of altuistic attitudes. Enfance (1): 89-100.

Garretson, J. and S. Landreth (2005). Cause-related marketing: Consumer effort and firm donation type. In American Marketing Association Marketing and Public Policy Proceedings. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

Gibbs, D. R., S. A. Mueller, and J. R. Wood (1973). Doctrinal orthodoxy, salience and the consequential dimension. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (12): 33-52.

Gorsuch, R. L. 1984. Measurement: The boon and bane of investigating religion. American Psychologist (39): 228-236.

Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B.J. Babin, & R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hill, P. C. & J. R. W. Hood. 1999. Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.

Hoge, D. R. & E. DeZulcuta. 1985. Salience as a condition for various social consequences of religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (24): 21-38.

Hunsberger, B. E. & E. Platonow (1986). Religion and helping charitable causes. Journal of Psychology (120): 517-528.

Ilter, B., G. Bayraktaroglu & I. Ipek. 2017 Impact of Islamic religiosity on materialistic values in Turkey. Journal of Islamic Marketing. doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2015-0092

Karylowski, J. 1982. Two types of altruistic behaviour: Doing good to feel good or to make the other feel good. In V. Derlega and J. Grzelad (Eds.), Cooperation and Helping Behaviour. New York: Academic Press .

Katz, D. 1960. The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly (24): 163-204.

Kiesler, C. A., B. E. Collins & N. Miller. 1969. Attitude ahange. New York: Wiley.

King, J. E. & M. R. Crowther. 2004. The measurement of religiosity and spirituality: Examples and issues from psychology. Journal of Organisational Change Management 17(1): 83-101.

Kotler, P. 1991. Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.

LaBarbera, P. A. & J. Stern. 1990. The relationship between Jewish religious intensity and rcharitableeat purchasing behaviour. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southern Marketing Association.

Landreth, S., J. Pirsch, et al. 2004. Cause related marketing campaign donation structures: Maximizing firm benefit and minimizing consumer mistrust. In American Marketing Association Marketing and Public Policy Proceedings. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

Maio, G. R. & J. M. Olson. 1995. Relations between values, attitudes and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of attitude function. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (31): 266-285.

Markus, H. 1977. Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (35): 63-78.

Markus, H. 1983. Self-knowledge: An expanded view. Journal of Personality (41): 543-565.

McDaniel, S. W. & J. J. Burnett. 1990. Consumer religiosity and retail store evaluative criteria. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (18): 101-112.

Olsen, G. D., J. W. Pracejus & N. R. Brown 2003. When profit equals price: Consumer confusion about donation amounts in cause-related marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 22(2): 170-180.

Perry, V. G. & C. M. Motley. 2010. Dreams and taboos: A cross-cultural comparison of home loan advertising in Saudi Arabia and the United States. International Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(2): 199-212.

Piliavin, J. A. & H. W. Chang. 1990. Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology (16): 27-65.

Polonsky, M. J. & R. Speed. 2001. Linking sponsorship and cause related marketing: Complementaries and conflicts. European Journal of Marketing 35(11/12): 1361-1385.

Pracejus, J. W., G. D. Olsen, & N. B. Brown. 2004. On the prevalence and impact of vague quantifiers in the advertising of cause-related marketing (CRM). Journal of Advertising (32): 19-28.

Rahman, M., M. Albaity, & B. Maruf. 2017. The role of religiosity on the relationship between materialism and fashion clothing consumption among Malaysian Generation Y consumers. Social Indicators Research 132(2): 757-783.

Ranganathan, S. K. & W. H. Henley. 2008. Determinants of charitable donation intentions: A structural equation model. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing (13): 1-11.

Rice, G. & M. Al-Mossawi. 2002. The implications of Islam for advertising messages: The Middle Eastern context. Journal of Euromarketing 11(3): 71-96.

Roof, W. C. & R. B. Perkins. 1975. On conccharitabletualizing salience in religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (14): 111-128.

Ross, J. K., L. T. Patterson, & M.A. Stutts (1992). Consumer perccharitabletions of organizations that use cause related marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 20(1): 93-97.

Ruhe, J. J. & M. Lee. 2008. Teaching ethics in international business courses: The impacts of religions. Journal of Teaching in International Business 19(4): 362-388.

Rytting, M. & H. T. Christensen. 1980. The effect of religious orthodoxy: A statistical analogy. Journal of Psychology and Theology (8): 314-322.

Schwartz, S. H. 1970. Elicitation of moral and self enhancing behaviour: an experimental study of volunteering to be bone marrow donor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (37): 283-293.

Sen, S. & C. B. Bhattacharya. 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research (38): 225-243.

Siguaw, J. A. & P. M. Simpson. 1997. Effects of religiousness on Sunday shopping and outshopping behaviours: A study of shopper attitudes nd behaviours in the American South. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 7(1): 23-40.

Sober, E. 1990. What is psychological egoism? Behaviorism (17): 89-102.

Sood, J. & Y. Nasu. 1995. Religiosity and nationality: An exploratory study of their effect on consumer behavior in Japan and the United States. Journal of Business Research (34): 1-9.

Strahilevitz, M. & J. G. Myers. 1998. Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may dcharitableend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research (24): 434-446.

Subrahmanyan, S. 2004. Effects of price premium and product type on the cause-related brands: A Singapore perspective. Journal of Product and Brand Management (13): 116-124.

Trimble, D. E. 1997. The Religious Orientation Scale: Review and meta-analysis of social desirability. Educational and Psychological Measurement (57): 970-986.

Tull, D. S. & D. I. Hawkins. 1990. Marketing research: Measurement and method. New York: Macmillan.

Watson, P. J., R. W. Hood, & R. J. Morris. 1985. Dimensions of religiosity and empathy. Journal of Psychology and Christianity (4): 73-85.

Webb, D. J., C. I. Green, and T. G. Brashear (2000). Development and validation of scales to measure attitudes influencing monetary donations to charitable organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(2): 299-309.

Webb, D. & L. Mohr. 1998. A typology of customers' responses to cause related marketing: From sccharitabletics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 17(2): 226-239.

Wilkes, R., J. Burnett,& R. D. Howell. 198. On the meaning and measurement of religiosity in consumer research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 14(1): 47-56.

Worthington, J. E. L. 1988. Understanding the values of religious clients: A model and its application to counselling. Journal of Counselling Psychology 35(2): 166-174.

Worthington, J. E. L., N. G. Wade, G. Nathaniel, T. L. Hight, J. S. Ripley, M. E. McCullough, J. W. Berry, M. M. Schmitt, J. T. Berry, K. H. Bursley, & L. O'Connor (2003). The religious commitment inventory-10: Development, refinement and validation of a brief scale for research and counselling. Journal of Counselling Psychology 50(1): 84-96.

Zinkin, J. 2007. Islam and CSR: A study of the compatibility between the tenets of Islam, the UN Global Compact and the development of social, human and nature capital. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (14): 206-218.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694