Tahap Konsep Kendiri, Kesedaran Komuniti, Sokongan Sosial dan Pengintegrasian Sosial bagi Pesalah Muda di Malaysia (Level of Self-Concept, Sense of Community, Social Support and Social Integration among Young Offenders in Malaysia)

Tharshini Sivabalan, Fauziah Ibrahim, Mohd Suhaimi Mohamad, Ezarina Zakaria

Abstract


Stigma merupakan suatu proses yang terbentuk apabila beberapa elemen utama seperti stereotaip, pelabelan, kehilangan status diri, pemisahan dan diskriminasi bergabung dengan situasi yang tertekan serta memberi kesan negatif yang mendalam terhadap proses komunikasi yang wujud di antara pesalah muda dengan ahli komuniti. Justeru, konsep kendiri, kesedaran komuniti, sokongan sosial dan pengintegrasian sosial yang tinggi amat diperlukan oleh pesalah muda untuk mengadaptasikan diri dalam komuniti bagi mengelakkan masalah keterasingan sosial akibat daripada sejarah keterlibatan dengan aktiviti jenayah. Oleh yang demikian, artikel ini disediakan bagi membincangkan mengenai tahap konsep kendiri, kesedaran komuniti, sokongan sosial dan pengintegrasian sosial bagi pesalah muda di Malaysia. Sebuah kajian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan reka bentuk tinjauan keratan-lintang telah dijalankan ke atas 306 pesalah muda yang sedang menjalani hukuman Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat di bawah pengawasan Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat. Data kajian dianalisis secara deskriptif dengan menggunakan IMB for SPSS versi 23.0. Keputusan kajian mendapati bahawa tahap konsep kendiri (72.9%), kesedaran komuniti (55.2%), sokongan sosial (77.5%) dan pengintegrasian sosial (67.3%) bagi pesalah muda berada pada tahap sederhana. Dapatan kajian memberi implikasi terhadap keperluan pihak yang berkepentingan untuk merangka dan menambahbaik modul dan program-program pemulihan ke arah meningkatkan tahap konsep kendiri, kesedaran komuniti, sokongan sosial dan pengintegrasian sosial bagi pesalah muda di Malaysia.


Kata kunci: Konsep kendiri; kesedaran komuniti; sokongan sosial; pengintegrasian sosial; pesalah muda


Abstract


Stigma is a process that befalls when several crucial elements such as stereotyping, labeling, status loss, separation and discrimination co-occur together in a stressful situation which causes negative impacts on young offender’s interactions with the community members. Therefore young offenders are required to acquire a higher level of self-concept, sense of community, social support and social integration in order to adapt themselves in a community to avoid social isolation due to their criminal history. Thus, this article discusses the level of self-concept, sense of community, social support and social integration among young offenders in Malaysia. Data is collected using a quantitative approach based on cross-section survey design among 306 young offenders undergoing Community Service Order (CSO) initiated by the Social Welfare Department. The resultant data were analysed descriptively using IMB for SPSS version 23.0. The result indicates that the majority of young offenders demonstrated a moderate level of self-concept (72.9%), sense of community (55.2%), social support (77.5%) and social integration (67.3%). As an overall impact, the study provided implications to the concerned parties to formulate and contrive the module and rehabilitation programme in order to improvise the level of self-concept, sense of community, social support and social integration among young offenders in Malaysia.


Keywords: Self-concept; sense of community; social support; social integration; young offenders


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. 1997. Psychological Testing (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Beaver, K.M., DeLisi, M., Mears, D.P., & Stewart, R. 2009. Low Self-Control and Contact with the Criminal Justice System in a Nationally Representative Sample of Males. Justice Quarterly; 26: 695-715.

Bernichon, T., Cook, K.E., & Brown, N.S. 2003. Seeking Self-Evaluative Feedback: The Interactive Role of Global Self-Esteem and Specific Self-Views. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; 84:194-204.

Bertotti, M.,Watts, P., Netuveli, G., Yu, G., Schmidt, E., Tobi, P., Renton, L. 2013. Types of Social Capital. Social Sciences and Medicine; 20-23.

Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J. & Thorndike, R. M. 1973. Cross Cultural Research Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Camp, D.L., Finlay, U., & Lyons, I. 2002. Is Sense of Community an Inevitable Consequence of Stigma? Social Science and Medicine; 55: 823-834.

Chavis, D.M., Lee, K.S., & Acosta, J.D. 2008. The Sense of Community (SCI) Revised. The Reliability and Validity of the SCI-2.

Chertok, F. 1990. A Measure of Perceived Sense of Community. Unpublished manuscript.

Christy, A., Visher, N.W., Bakken, R., & Whitney, D.G. 2013. Community Reintegration and Successful Outcomes. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation; 52 (7): 451-469.

Chua, Y.P. 2009. Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan Buku 2: Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. Edisi ke-3. Shah Alam: McGraw-Hill Education.

Chua, Y.P. 2014. Asas Statistik Penyelidikan Buku 3: Analisis Data Skala Ordinal dan Skala Nominal. Shah Alam: McGraw-Hill Education.

Cohen, S., & Hoberman, H. 1983. Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 99-125.

David, E.O., Loretta, J.S., & Gipsy, E. 2015. Comparing Male and Female Prison Releasees across Risk Factors and Postprison Recidivism. Women & Criminal Justice.

De Vaus, D.A. 1993. Surveys in Social Research (3rd Ed.). London: UCL Press.

Demaray, M.K., Malecki, C.K. 2014. Best Practices in Assessing and Promoting Social Support. Northern Illinois University.

Dijkers, T. 1999. Community Integration: Conceptual Issues and Measurement Approaches in Rehabilitation Research. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcome Measurement; 3(1): 39-49.

Felson, R.B., & Kreager, D.A. 2015. Group Differences in Sense Of Community: What Is There to Explain in Social Support? Journal of Race and Justice: 5 (1): 58–87.

Fleming, J.S., & Courtney, B.E. 1984. Multidimensional Self-Concept Scale. Journal of Social Psychology; 14: 9-12.

Frankfort, C., & Nachmias, I. 2000. Research Methods in the Social Sciences Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Goodwin, R., & Hernandez, P. 2000. Theory, Research and Application: Perceived and Received Social Support. Journal of Social Sciences; 12: 112-117.

Graham, J.A., & Harris, Y.R. 2013. Incarceration: Implications for Research, Theory and Practice. Journal of Multicultural Development; 41: 66–81.

Greeno, C., & Kim, K. 2008. A Confirmatory Analysis of an Abbreviated Sense of Community Instrument: The MOS-SSS. Research on Social Work Practice; 10 (10): 1-7.

Harter, T.A. 1986. Processes Underlying the Construction, Maintenance and Enhancement of the Self-Concept in Children. Psychological Perspectives on the Self; NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Jason, L.A., Chertok, F. 1997. Measuring Sense of Community: Beyond Local Boundaries. The Journal of Primary Prevention; 18 (2): 193-212.

Jiang, S., & Winfree, L.T. 2007. Gender and Inmate Adjustment to Prison Life: Sense of Community and Macro Level Sollution. The Prison Journal; 86: 32-55.

Lancaster, G., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P. 2004. Design and Analysis of Pilot Studies: Recommendations for Good Practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (2): 307-12.

Laporan Tahunan Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat Malaysia. 2009-2015.

Laporan Tahunan Jabatan Penjara Malaysia. 2011-2013.

Lebel, T.P. 2012. Invisible Stripes? Formerly Incarcerated Person’s Perceptions of Stigma. Journal of Deviant Behavior; 33:89–107.

Leverentz, R. 2011. Barriers to Reintegration: Rehabilitation, Reentry and Reintegration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Marsh, K.I. 1990. A Multidimensional, Hierarchical Model of Self-Concept: Theoretical and Empirical Justification. Journal of Educational Psychology Review; 2: 77-172.

Mashek, D., Cannaday, L.W., & Tangney, J.P. 2007. Inclusion of Community in Self Scale: A Single-Item Pictorial Measure of Community Connectedness. Journal of Community Psychology; 35: 257–275.

Motzkin, J.C., Philippi, C.L., Kirk, G.R., Newman, J.P., Kiehl, O. 2012. Critical Thinning in Psychopathy, Self-Concept and Integration. American Journal of Psychiatry; 169: 743–749.

Othman, M. 1999. Penulisan Tesis dan Analisis Data Dalam Bidang Sains Sosial Terapan. Serdang: Penerbitan UPM.

Peraturan Tetap Operasi Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat (Pindaan 2011), Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat.

Rogers, C., Charles, D.C. 1951. The Psychology of Human Growth and Development. Rein Holt New York.

Sarason, S. 1974. Psychological Sense of Community: Prospects for a Community Psychology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Schwarzer, R., Hahn, A. 1994. Social Integration and Social Support in a Life Crisis: Effects of Macrosocial Change in East Germany. American Journal of Community Psychology; 685-704.

Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J., & Stanton, R. 1976. Self-Concept: Validation of Construct Interpretations. Journal of Educational Research; 46: 407–441.

Siegrist, I. 1996. The Influence of Self-Consciousness on the Internal Consistency of Different Scales. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences; 20: 115-117.

Smallbone, S., Marshall, W.L., & Wortley, R. 2013. A Meta-Analysis of Sexual Offenders. Journal of Counselling and Clinical Psychology; 66 (2): 345-357.

Standards for Eductional and Psychological Testing. 1985. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Susan, M., & Murray, A. 1995. The Social Integration Scale. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association and the International Conference on Family Violence.

Teplin, L.A., Abram, K.M., McClelland, G.M., Mericle, A.A., Dulcan, M.K., & Washburn, S. 2006. Social Support among Young Offenders. Oxford University 4th Edition.

Thoits, P.A. 2011. Resisting the Stigma of Offenders. Social Psychology Quarterly; 74 (6): 6-28.

Turner, S., & Jannetta, J. 2010. Are Sex Offenders Moving into Social Disorganization? Analyzing the Residential Mobility of California Parolees. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency; 47: 558-590.

United Nations. 2012. Social Integration: Social Policy and Development Division.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694