Due to the critical role that perceptual learning styles as indicators of individual differences play in L2 learners' activities and thus their academic achievement, the present investigation was aimed to study the role of L2 learners' perceptual styles in lexical inferencing and also the strategies used for lexical inferences in the Iranian context of English language learning. To this end, 134 participants majoring in different engineering fields took part in the study. They received strategy training on how to infer the meanings of unfamiliar words. They then answered a perceptual styles preferences questionnaire and were tested on the selected texts for lexical inferencing. They were asked to extract the meaning of unfamiliar words and simultaneously identify the relevant strategy employed for lexical inferencing by marking it on the strategy questionnaire. The analysis identified the biggest number of participants as being kinesthetic despite the fact that classes were mainly held through audio-visual activities. The findings also showed a meaningful difference between group categories of styles preferences and their lexical inferencing ability (F=4.57, p<.05). As for the modifying effect of perceptual styles on the strategies used by various groups of learners, 'visual learners' were found to have the highest correlation with ‘syntactic knowledge analysis’ (r=.70, p=.01). The results of the study point to the importance of individual differences in the perception of and interaction with the learning environment.

Keywords: perceptual learning styles; lexical inferencing; strategy training; strategy use; L2  

  DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2201-14

Carbo, M. (1983). Research in reading and learning style: Implications for exceptional children. Exceptional Children, 49, 486-494.

Clark, D.F. & Nation, S.P. (1980). Guessing the meanings of words from context: Strategy and techniques. System, 8, 211-220.

Collinson, E. (2000). A survey of elementary students' learning style preferences and academic success. Contemporary Education, 71(4), 42-48.

de Bot, K., Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. B. (1997). Toward a lexical processing model for the study of second language vocabulary acquisition: Evidence from ESL reading. Studies in Second Language

Acquisition, 19, 309–329.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual

Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ehrman, M. & Oxford, R. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. Modern Language Journal, 74, 311-326.

Ehrman, M. (1999). Ego boundaries and tolerance of ambiguity in second language learning. In: Arnold, J. (Ed.), Affect in Language Learning (pp. 68-86). Cambridge UP, New York.

Frantzen, D. (2003). Factors affecting how second language Spanish

students deriving meaning from context. The Modern Language Journal. 87, 168-199

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language as Social Semiotic. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

Ham, S. (2005). Learning style preferences, English learning strategies, and EFL achievement of Korean university students. Foreign Languages Education, 12(1), 295-332.

Hua, T. K., Nor, N. F. M., & Jaradat, M. N. (2012). Communication strategies among EFL students-An examination of frequency of use and types of strategies used. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, Vol. 12(3), 831-848.

Huckin, T., & Bloch, J. (1993). Strategies for inferring word meaning from context: A cognitive model. In T.Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 153– 178). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Hue, H.C. & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown word density and reading comprehension. Reading in Foreign Language, 13(1), 403-430.

Keefe, J.W. (1979). Learning styles: an overview. In Keefe, J.W. (Ed.), Student Learning Styles Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs (pp. 1-17). National Association of Secondary School Principals, Reston, VA.

Kinsella, K. (1995). Understanding and empowering diverse learners in ESL classroom. In M. J. Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom (pp. 74-86).Heinle & Heinle Publishers, Boston, MA.

Kroonenberg, N. (1995). Meeting language learners’ sensory-learning-style preferences. In: Reid, J.o.e.M. (Ed.), Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom (pp. 74-86). Heinle & Heinle Publishers, Boston.

Levine, A. & Reves, T. (1998). Interplay between reading tasks, reader variables and unknown word processing. TESL-EJ 3 (2), 1-12. Liu, N.,

Nation, I.S.P., 1985. Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context.

RELC Journal, 16 (1), 33-42.

Matthews, D. (1996). An investigation of learning styles and perceived academic achievement for high school students. The Clearing House, 69, 249-254.

Nassaji, H. (2006). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Modern Language Journal, 90 (3), 387-401.

Obralic, N. & Akbarov, A. (2012).Students preference on perceptual learning style. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5 (3), 31-42.

Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Newbury House, NY.

Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21,195–224.

Parry, K. (1993). Too many words: Learning the vocabulary of an academic subject. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 109–129). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Peacock, M. (2001). Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching styles in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11 (1), 38-58.

Reid, J.M. (1995). Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom. Heinle & Heinle Publishers, Boston.

Seifoori, Z & Zarei, M. (2011). The relationship between Iranian EFL learners' perceptual learning styles and their multiple intelligences. Procedia, Social Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1606-1613.

Shen, M-y (2010). Effects of perceptual learning style preferences on L2 lexical inferencing. System, 38, 539-547.

Tripp, L. O., & Moore, S. D. (2007). Examination of pre-service teachers’ learning styles and temperament styles within an elementary science methods course. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1(Fall 2007), 23-33.

Whitney, P. (1987). Psychological theories of elaborative inferences: Implications for schema-theoretic views of comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 299–310.

Yang, J.-S., & Kim, T.-Y. (2011). The L2 motivational self system and perceptual learning styles of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Swedish students. English Teaching, 66(1), 141-162.

Kim, T.-Y & Kim, Y.-K (2014). A structural model for perceptual learning styles, the ideal L2 self, motivated behavior, and English proficiency. System, 46, 14-27.

Zarifi, A. & Mukundan, J. (2014). Creativity and unnaturalness in the use of phrasal verbs in ESL learner language. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20(3), 51-62.

Zhenhui, R. (2001). Matching teaching styles with learning styles for ESL/EFL instruction. The Internet TESL Journal, 7 (7).