Disasters are not only physical events but also discursive phenomena shaped by media language. This study examines how the 2025 Thailand earthquake was linguistically represented in Thai English-language newspapers and international news outlets. Drawing on 120 news reports (60 Thai and 60 international), the study employs a corpus-assisted Critical Discourse Analysis (CACDA) approach, combining Fairclough’s three-dimensional model with Halliday’s transitivity framework to analyse discursive and ideological patterns. Findings from corpus linguistic analysis indicate differences in the representation of the earthquake. While keywords in the Thai media tend to emphasise the government agencies’ roles, the international media focuses more on the international organisations’ roles, the political conflicts, and the victims’ voices. Collocation analysis of “government,” “earthquake/quake,” and “people” further corroborates these and shows that the international media use stronger and more vivid language to depict the event. Manual analysis of selected text reveals that Thai media adopt a bureaucratic tone, foregrounding institutional responses through nominalisations, passive voice, and modality that obscure agency and reduce emotional salience. In contrast, international outlets highlight human suffering using active voice, agentive structures, and emotionally charged vocabulary. These differences reflect broader sociocultural norms—such as collectivist deference to authority in Thai journalism versus individualistic and accountability-driven narratives in international media. The study offers insights into how crisis discourse is mediated by national ideologies and journalistic conventions. Implications extend to disaster communication, media discourse education, and intercultural understanding.

Keywords: Media Discourse; Critical Discourse Analysis; Corpus Linguistics; Thailand Earthquake; Disasters

DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2026-3202-06

Abas, N., Abdul Aziz, R., Turiman, S., & Mat Daud, N. S. (2023). A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of COVID-19 vaccination-related news discourse in the Malaysian mainstream media. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 29(3), 148–165.https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2903-11

Ambikapathy, M., Abdul Hamid, M. K., & Annamalai, S. (2024). Crisis communication strategies during natural disaster crisis case studies: Selangor flood, Malaysia. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 6(2), 133–141.

Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2015). Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora. Palgrave Macmillan.

Barkho, L. (2008). The BBC’s discursive strategy and practices during the Second Palestinian Intifada. Journal of Language and Politics, 7(1), 85–110.

BBC News. (2025, March 28). Holidaymakers describe 'chaos' after quake hits Bangkok. BBC News. Retrieved November 20, 2025, from https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9n95xepp3o

Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2017). The discourse of news values: How News organizations create newsworthiness. Oxford University Press.

CARE. (2025, April 9). CARE scales up emergency response as earthquake devastation deepens in Myanmar. Retrieved November 20, 2025, from https://www.care.org/media-and-press/care-scales-up-emergency-response-as-earthquake-devastation-deepens-in-myanmar/

Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. SAGE.

Chouliaraki, L., & Vestergaard, A. (Eds.). (2022). Routledge handbook of humanitarian communication. Routledge.Chovanec, J. (2014). Pragmatics of disaster: Discourse and emergency Events. Peter Lang.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold.

Freedom House. (2023). Freedom in the World 2023: Thailand country report. Retrieved September 22, 2025, from https://freedomhouse.org/country/thailand/freedom-world/2023

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Khawaja, S., Aslam, S., Yousaf, M., Mahmood, N., Yaser, N., Raza, S. H., & Mahmood, T. (2025). Media, disasters, and the Global South: Comparing Global North and South media framing on Pakistan’s 2022 floods. Journalism and Media, 6(2), 70. Retrieved September 22, 2025, from

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/6/2/70

Li, T., & Zhen, X. (2025). A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the American and British media reports on the discharge of water from Fukushima. Journal of Global Trends in Social Science, 2(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.70731/y6w5w512

Liu, L., & Stevenson, M. (2013). A cross-cultural analysis of stance in disaster news reports. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. 36(2). 197-220.

Liu, Z., & Abu Bakar, K. (2024). Shifting narratives: A corpus-based discourse analysis of American media’s portrayal of China’s COVID-19 response. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 30(1), 125–141. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3001-10

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mohammed, A. R., Aladdin, A., & Shaari, A. H. (2025). Media representation of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood in Arab and Western Outlets: A Critical Discourse Analysis. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 31(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2025-3103-21

Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins.

Potts, A., Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2015). How can computer-based methods help researchers to investigate news values in large datasets? A corpus linguistic study of the construction of newsworthiness in the reporting on Hurricane Katrina. Discourse & Communication. 9(2). 149-172.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481314568548

Pyles, L., & Svistova, J. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of Haiti earthquake recovery in New York Times articles: Implications for social welfare policies, practices, and education. Critical Social Work, 16(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v16i1.5916

Raza, M., Khalil, H., Fareed, M., Eneizat, M. F., Ab Ul Hassan, A., & Faizuddin, A. (2025). Resilience or rhetoric? A framing analysis of flood disaster reporting in Pakistan’s media. Journalism and Media, 6(4), 185. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/6/4/185

Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.

Rosemary, R., Syam, H. M., & Sartika, M. (2023). Framing disaster coverage of earthquakes and tsunamis on online media. International Journal of Disaster Management, 6(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.24815/ijdm.v6i2.31867

Scollon, R., Scollon, S. B. K., & Jones, R. H. (2012). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Solman, P., & Henderson, L. (2019). Flood disasters in the United Kingdom and India: A critical discourse analysis of media reporting. Journalism, 20(12), 1648–1664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918762363

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE.

Yitong, W., & Samaha, H. (2026). War and conflicting voices: Attitudinal analysis of Chinese and British news reports on the Israel-Gaza war. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2026-3201-01