This study examines the contrasting media coverage of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood to uncover the ideological underpinnings of the accounts presented by Al-Jazeera and CNN. It examines how the two leading media outlets report the same event from essentially contradictory viewpoints, thereby mirroring wider geopolitical divides. The study compares the narratives and examines the ideological parameters which shape the conflict reporting. It also employs Fairclough’s three- dimensional approach to conduct a textual, discursive and sociocultural analysis of the context embedded in media reporting. Besides, the study conducts a qualitative content analysis of Al-Jazeera and CNN news reports and evaluates the narratives to explain the differences in the representation and inherent bias.  The study design employs qualitative content analysis of broadcast news reports released by both Al-Jazeera and CNN, as well as a comparative evaluation of the narratives to explain variations in representations and inherent biases. The findings show that CNN reporting is characterized by violence- and hostility-focused language that frames the event as a legitimate use of force. However, Al-Jazeera’s coverage places the emphasis on the themes of liberation and resistance. CNN’s ideological bias reflects the Western geopolitical interests and Israeli sympathies, while Palestinian actions are discursively constructed as terrorist acts. By contrast, Al-Jazeera's narratives are congruent with the Middle Eastern perspectives and represent the operation as both a battle against occupation and a struggle for Palestinian independence. The study highlights the significance of media literacy in fostering critically engaged news media consumption and calls for more balanced perspectives in news coverage on international conflicts. It also underscores the value of employing diverse analytical approaches to deepen understanding of media representations in conflict contexts, thereby expanding on existing research in this particular field.

Keywords: Media representation; ideological framing; Israeli-Palestinian conflict; narrative analysis; critical discourse analysis

Adediran. I., A. (2023). The Role of Mass Media in Crisis Management in Nigeria. Global journal of arts, humanities and social sciences.10.37745/gjahss.2013/vol11n73243

Alkhammash, R. (2020). Discursive representation of the EU in Brexit-related British Media. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 20(1), 77-91.

Amer, M. (2017). Critical discourse analysis of war reporting in the international press: The case of the Gaza war of 2008–2009. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1-11.

Amir, M. (2021). Post-occupation Gaza: Israel’s war on Palestinian futures. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 103(4), 283-300.Baden, C., & Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2018). The search for common ground in conflict news research: Comparing the coverage of six current conflicts in

domestic and international media over time. Media, War & Conflict, 11(1), 22-45.

Bolte, S., & Keong, Y. C. (2014). The Refugee Swap Deal in Malaysian Online News Reports: Ideology and Representation. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(2).

Bustam, M. R. (2018, November). Media Attention for Jerusalem Declaration: a Comparative Discourse Analysis on International Online Newspapers. In International Conference on Business, Economic, Social Science and Humanities (ICOBEST 2018) (pp. 131-134). Atlantis Press.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

Fahmy, S. (2010). Contrasting visual frames of our times: A framing analysis of English- and Arabic-language press coverage of war and terrorism. International Communication Gazette, 72(8), 695-717.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman Group Ltd.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. Arnold.

Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and Power (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Galeazzi, A., Peruzzi, A., Brugnoli, E., Delmastro, M., & Zollo, F. (2023). Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption. PNAS nexus, 3(11), p, 474.

Haj Omar, H. (2019, July). A narrative approach to media reporting of the Arab-Israeli conflict 2000–2010: An analytic study. In Forum (Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 20-38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Heni, A. N., & Chandra, O. H. (2022). The Representation of Palestinian-Israeli Conflict in Online News Articles: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya, 12(1), 134-147.

Liu, Z., & Bakar, K. A. (2024). Shifting Narratives: A Corpus-based Discourse Analysis of American Media's Portrayal of China's COVID-19 Response. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 30(1).

Lynch, M. (2006). Voices of the new Arab public: Iraq, Al-Jazeera, and Middle East politics today. Columbia University Press.

McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.

Minh, T. (2020). How biased are American media outlets? A framework for presentation bias regression. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 4359-4364). IEEE. 10.1109/BIGDATA50022.2020.9377987

Mohammed, A. R. (2024). Unveiling Discursive Strategies and Ideologies: A Critical Analysis of Migration Discourse in Turkish Newspapers. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 24(3), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v24i3.848

Moten, A. R. (2018). US Embassy in Jerusalem: Reasons, implications and consequences. Intellectual Discourse, 26(1), 5-22.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). The Thinker’s Guide for Conscientious Citizens on How to Detect Media Bias & Propaganda in National and World News (3rd edn.). California: Foundation for Critical Thinking press.

Purnama, A. (2018). The representation of Hamas and Israel in American and Arabian mass media: a critical discourse analysis. Universitas Padjajaran, 29-42. doi: 10.26499/METALINGUA.V14I1.182

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse-historical Approach (DHA). In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 87-121). Sage.

Salman, A., & Hasim, M. S. (2011). New media and democracy: the changing political landscape in Malaysia. Akademika, 81(1), 15-21.

Suwarno, S., & Sahayu, W. (2020). Palestine and Israel Representation in the National and International News Media: A Critical Discourse Study. Humaniora, 32(3), 217-225.

Swati, A., Tushar, S., Yash, K., Siddarth, S. (2020). Media bias detection and bias short term impact assessment. Array, 6(1), 10.1016/J.ARRAY.2020.100025

Timotijevic, J. (2022). The Historical Context in Media Narratives in Search of Peaceful Resolution to the Israel–Palestine Conflict. Discourse, Media, and Conflict: Examining War and Resolution in the News, 257.

Valbjørn, M., Bank, A., & Darwich, M. (2024). Forward to the Past? Regional Repercussions of the Gaza War. Middle East Policy, 31(3), 3-17.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A socio-cognitive approach. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 62-86). Sage.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press.

Vartanova, E. (2023). Media and social conflicts: theoretical and methodological challenges of an interdisciplinary approach. Вестник Томского государственного университета, 321-338. 10.17223/19986645/82/15

Velu, U. R. A. R., & How, C. (2019). Symbolic representation of Tun Dr Mahathir: visual analysis of a Malaysian short film. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(4).

Wolfsfeld, G. (2004). Media and the path to peace. Cambridge University Press.

Wu, H., Bakar, K. B. A., Jaludin, A. B., & Awal, N. M. (2025). Analysis of Attitudinal Resources in China-Related News in The Star Online. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 31(1).