By examining the subversive discourse of both children, Charles and Smudge, this paper will focus on the child’s identity in Anthony Browne’s postmodern picture book Voices in the Park. Drawing on the postmodern theory and mainly on Lyotard’s perception of childhood as a time of intense creativity and imagination, where the child is free to explore the world in a way that is not bound by the adult’s rationality and logic, this paper will analyse how Charles’s and Smudge’s discourses dare to go against the normative discourse of their parents. Smudge manages to change her father’s discourse, while Charles deconstructs his mother’s discourse by exposing its flaws and creating the possibility for resistance. By analysing the underlying tensions between the normative discourses of the parents and that of the children, which Lyotard calls the ‘other of all discourse’, this study offers some insights into the identity of the child Browne presents to his readers. This paper highlights the nature of the agency the children manage to construct through their encounters in the park. It will conclude that although children are an integral part of the parents’ normative power structure, they manage to become a disruptive force of change from within the system itself.

Keywords: Voices in the Park; Anthony Browne; child’s identity; Lyotard

Atken, A. (2007). Postmodernism and children’s literature. International Christian Community of Teacher Educators Journal, 2(2), 1–7.

Browne, A. (2000). Voices in the Park. Corgi. https://doi.org/10.1604/9780552545648

Collins, B. (1993). Reconstruing co-dependency using self-in-relation theory: a feminist perspective. Social Work, 38(4), 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/38.4.470

Elkind, D. (1998). Children with special needs: A postmodern perspective. Journal of Education, 180(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205749818000202

Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. Vintage. https://doi.org/10.1604/9780679724698

Foucault, M. (1999). About the beginnings of the hermeneutics of the self. In J. Carrette (Ed.), Religion and culture (pp. 158-181). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Hassan, I. (1986). Pluralism in postmodern perspective. Critical Inquiry, 12(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1086/448348

Jones, R. (2012). Irigaray and Lyotard: Birth, infancy, and metaphysics. Hypatia, 27(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01236.x

Joosen, V. (2015). “‘Look more closely,’ said mum”: Mothers in Anthony Browne’s picture books. Children’s Literature in Education, 46(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-015-9253-3

Jordan, J. V. (1986). The meaning of mutuality. Work in Progress, No. 23, 1-11. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://www.wcwonline.org/vmfiles/23sc.pdf

Jordan, J. V. (1995). A relational approach to psychotherapy. Women & Therapy, 16(4), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1300/j015v16n04_05

Locke, K. (2012). Lyotard’s infancy: A debt that persists. Postmodern Culture, 23(1), 1-23 https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.2013.0018.

Lyotard, J. F. (1991a). Lectures d’enfance. Paris: Galilee

Lyotard, J. F. (1991b). The inhuman: reflections on time. Translated by Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Stanford: Stanford UP. https://doi.org/10.1604/9780745612386

Lyotard, J. F. (1992a). Minimise. Philosophy Today, 36(4), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday199236411

Lyotard, J. F. (2013). Why philosophise? Translated by Andrew Brown. Great Britain: Polity Press.

Miller, J. B. (2008). Connections, disconnections, and violations. Feminism & Psychology, 18(3), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353508092090

Moya-Guijarro, A. J. (2019). Textual functions of metonymies in Anthony Browne’s picture books: A multimodal approach. Text & Talk, 39(3), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2034

Nikolajeva, M. (1998). Exit children’s literature? The Lion and the Unicorn, 22(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1353/uni.1998.0028

Nikolajeva, M. (2003). Verbal and visual literacy: The role of picturebooks in the reading experience of young children. In N. Hall, J. Larson & J Marsa (Editors.), Handbook of early childhood literacy, pp. 235-248. London: Sage.

Pantaleo, S. (2004). The long, long way: Young children explore the Fabula and Syuzhet of Shortcut. Children’s Literature in Education, 35(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:clid.0000018897.74948.2a

Saltmarsh, S. (2007). Picturing economic childhoods: Agency, inevitability and social class in children’s picture books. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798407074838

Sarikartal, E. (2019). Childhood and education in Jean-François Lyotard’s philosophy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1605899

Serafini, F. (2005). Voices in the Park, voices in the classroom: Readers responding to postmodern picture books. Reading Research and Instruction, 44(3), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070509558431

Wyile, S. A. (2006). The drama of potentiality in metafictive picturebooks: Engaging pictorialization in shortcut, ooh-la-la, and Voices in the Park. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 31(2), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.1353/chq.2006.0045