A Corpus Study of Structural Types of Lexical Bundles in MUET Reading Texts
Abstract
In view of the recurrent issues concerning university students’ inability to comprehend reading passages in their studies, texts used in a Malaysian examination for tertiary education were analysed. This study investigates the use of lexical bundles (LBs) in the reading passages of Malaysian University English Test (MUET). A specialised corpus of MUET test papers comprised of only the reading passages grouped into two main disciplines namely arts and science was built. Besides identifying commonly used LBs, this study aims to compare and contrast structural types of LBs found in arts and science-based texts. Using WordSmith Tools version 5, the lists of LBs of the identified disciplines were generated. They were analysed qualitatively based on Biber, Conrad & Cortes’ (2004) Structural Taxonomy. Findings revealed that the number of LBs in both disciplines differs significantly but many similar LBs are employed. It was also evident that science-based texts tend to employ more NP-based and VP-based LBs while the most commonly used structure in arts-based texts is dependent clause. In general, PP-based LBs are very significant in both science and arts-based texts. The extent to which LBs are specific to particular disciplines is therefore confirmed and an overview of how LBs in texts construct information is also obtained. Pedagogically, teachers should consider incorporating corpora-based material, to exploit consciousness raising tasks and not to emphasise too much on grammatical items so that LBs do not go unnoticed.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2014-2002-11
Keywords: lexical bundles; structural types; reading text; MUET; reading test
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alderson, J.C. (1990). Testing reading comprehension skills (part one). Reading in a Foreign Language, 6(2), 425- 438. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/PastIssues/rfl62anderson.pdf
Alderson, J.C. (2005). Assessing reading. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Bahiyah, A. H., Mohd. S. M. Y., Kesumawati, A. B., Yuen, C.K. & Azhar, J. (2008). Linguistic sexism and gender role stereotyping in Malaysian English language textbooks. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 45-78.
Bal, B. (2010). Analysis of four-word lexical bundles in published research articles written by Turkish scholars. Applied Linguistics and English as a Second Language Theses. Paper 2. Retrieved from http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=alesl_theses
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26(2007): 263-286.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at.….: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405.
Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book. 2nd ed. USA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers
Chen, Y., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 30–49. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num2/chenbaker.pdf
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2012). Lexical bundles in academic texts by non-native speakers. Brno Studies in English, 38(2). Retrieved from http://www.phil.muni.cz/plonedata/wkaa/BSE/BSE_2012/BSE_2012-38_2_-XX_Dontcheva-Navratilova.pdf
Green, A. Unaldi, A. & Weir, C. (2010). Empiricism versus connoisseurship: Establishing the appropriacy of texts in tests of academic reading. Language Testing, 27(2), 191–211.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2008), 4–21
Hyland, K & Tse, P. (2009). Academic lexis and disciplinary practice: Corpus evidence for specificity. International Journal of English Studies (IJES),9(2),111-129.
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. Laane, Mare-Anne. (2011). Lexical bundles in engineering research articles. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium “Topical Problems in the Field of Electrical and Power Engineering”, 72-75.
Lee, K.S. (2004). Exploring connection between the testing of reading and literacy: The case of the MUET. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 4(1), 1-12.
Lin, C. (2008). An investigation of lexical bundles in electrical engineering introductory textbooks and ESP textbooks (Unpublished master’s thesis). Canada: Carleton University.
Liu, D. (2012). The most frequently-used multi-word constructions in academic written English: A multi-corpus study. English for Specific Purposes, 31 (2012), 25–35.
Malaysian Examination Council. (2008). Malaysian University English Test (MUET). Malaysia: Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia.
Nambiar, R.M.K. (2007) Enhancing academic literacy among tertiary learners: A Malaysian experience.3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 13, 77-94.
Nazira, B. O. & Kamaruzaman, J. (2009). Routinizing lexical phrases on spoken discourse. International
Education Studies, 2(2), 188-191. Retieved from: http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ies/article/viewFile / 1726/1660
Neely, E., & Cortes, C. (2009). A little bit about: Analyzing and teaching lexical bundles in academic lectures.
Language Value, 1(1), 17-38.
Noorizah, M. N. (2006). Reading academic text: Awareness and experiences among university ESL learners. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 6(2), 65-78.
Normazidah, C. M, Koo, Y.L., & Hazita, A. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 35-51.
Pang, W. (2010). Lexical bundles and the construction of an academic voice: A pedagogical perspective. Asia EFL Journal 47. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/1428822/Lexical_Bundles_and_the_Construction _of_an_Academic_Voice_A_Pedagogical_Perspective
Pardo. L. S. (2004). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. International Reading Association,272–280. Retrieved from: http://www.learner.org/workshops/teachreading35/pdf/teachers_know_comprehension.pdf
Read, J., & Nation, P. (2002). An investigation of the lexical dimension of the IELTS Speaking Test. IELTS Research Reports Volume 6. Retrieved from http://www.ielts.org/pdf/Vol6_Report7.pdf
Romer, U. 2004. Comparing real and ideal language learner input: The use of an EFL textbook corpus in corpus linguistics and language teaching. In G. Aston, S. Bernardini & D.
Stewart (Eds.). Corpora and Language Learners (pp. 151–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Saadiyah, D. & Khor, H. C. (2009). Common errors in written English essays of form one Chinese students: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (2), 242-253. Retrieved from http://www.eurojournals com/ ejss_10_2_07.pdf
Strunkyte, G. & Jurkūnaite, E. (2008). Written academic discourse: Lexical bundles in humanities and natural sciences (Unpublished bachelor’s thesis). Vilnius University, Vilnius.
Zuraidah, M. D., & Maya, K. D., 2005. The testing of literacy skills in an ESL environment. In Chan Swee Heng & Malachi, Edwin Vethamani (Eds.). ELT Concerns in Assessment (pp. 111-126). Malaysia: SASBADI MELTA ELT Series.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157