Expert Writers’ Recommendations in Economics Research Articles: Implications for the Teaching of English for Academic Purposes
Abstract
The presentation of economics research results often constitutes the climax of data-driven research articles in the discipline, but how writers make recommendations based on their results remains a fertile area for an in-depth investigation. To date, no research has been conducted to ascertain the extent to which economics researchers incorporate such recommendations, and how they use language resources to perform the communicative functions involved. Our genre-based study employed the Swalesian move-step analytical framework to examine the occurrence of this pivotal rhetorical category, which makes suggestions based on research findings in economics. This largely qualitative analysis was triangulated via interviews with specialist informants in the field. Our results have shown that recommendations, being a quasi-obligatory move that comprises two noteworthy optional steps, are strategically linked with not only research results but also limitations of the research being reported. The expert writers employ a wide spectrum of language resources, particularly adjectives depicting indeterminacy and noun phrases denoting industrial and policy implications, to tacitly accentuate the value of their results. In regard to pedagogical implications, it is suggested that instructors devise exercises requiring novice writers to construct sentences involving suggestion indicators and verb phrases signalling epistemic modality while guiding learners to make recommendations for future research. With respect to recommendations for practical applications, text-completion exercises may be designed to familiarise learners with the use of active clauses containing nominalisations, which are largely intended to minimise self-mentions and increase objectivity while proposing actions to be taken in real-life settings.
Keywords: English for academic purposes; discourse analysis; genre analysis; academic writing; recommendationsFull Text:
PDFReferences
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134-144.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Essex: Longman Group U.K. Limited.
Biber, D., Connor, D., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the Results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47-59.
Bruce, I. (2008). Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research articles: a corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 38-54.
Cargill, M., & Burgess, S. (Eds.). (2017). Publishing research in English as an additional language: Practices, pathways and potentials. University of Adelaide Press. Retrieved July 8, 2021, from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/publishing-research-in-english-as-an-additional-
language/D5AC383AE6BE6B3517A4CFBB179A7535.
Cheng, W., & Cheng, L. (2014). Epistemic modality in court judgments: A corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 15-26.
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 397–423.
Cortes, V. (2006). Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and Education, 17, 391-406.
Cortes, V. (2019). Considering the importance of L2 learners’ writing needs. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 1-2.
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2015). Furthering and applying move/step constructs: Technology-driven marshalling of Swalesian genre theory for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 52-72.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation. 62(4): 428-446.
Dahl, T. (2009). The linguistic representation of rhetorical function: A study of how economists present their knowledge claims. Written Communication, 26(4), 370-391.
Del Saz Rubio, M. M. (2011). A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of agricultural sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 30(4), 258-271.
Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition & Communication, 35(2), 155-171.
Hirano, E. (2009). Research article introductions in English for Specific Purposes: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 240-250.
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113-121.
Joseph, R., & Lim, J. M. H. (2018). Background information in the Discussion sections of Forestry journals: A case study. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18(1), 198-216.
Joseph, R., & Lim, J. M. H. (2019). Directions for the future: A genre-based investigation into recommendations for further research and practical applications in Forestry. ESP Today, 7(2), 124-147.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269-292.
Kassouri, Y., & Altıntas, H. (2020). Human well-being versus ecological footprint in MENA countries: A trade-off? Journal of Environmental Management, 263, 1-16.
Klein, J. D., & Reiser, R. A. (2014). Suggestions for structuring a research article. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 22-38.
Koutsantoni, D. (2006). Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advance academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 19–36.
Lakic, I. (2010). Analysing genre: Research article introductions in economics. The Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education, 3, 83-99.
Li, Y, & Flowerdew, J. (2020). Teaching English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP): A review of language teachers’ pedagogical initiatives. English for Specific Purposes, 59, 29–41.
Li, L., & Ge, G. (2009). Genre analysis: structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium research article (1985-2004). English for Specific Purposes, 28(2), 93-104.
Lim, J. M. H. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282-309.
Lim, J. M. H. (2008). Analysing recommendations for future research: An investigation into a hybrid sub-genre. In R. Wilkinson & V. Zegers (Eds.) Realizing content and language integration in higher education (pp. 131-154). Maastricht: Maastricht University.
Lim, J. M. H. (2012). How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers’ rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(3), 229-245.
Lim, J. M. H. (2014). Expert writers’ descriptions and justifications of research instruments and materials: Using communicative resources to generate promotional effects. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 11(2), 154-176.
Lim, J. M. H. (2017). Writing descriptions of experimental procedures in language education: Implications for the teaching of English for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 47, 61-80.
Lim, J. M. H. (2019). Explicit and implicit justifications of experimental procedures in language education: Pedagogical implications of studying expert writers’ communicative resources. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 34-51.
Lim, J. M. H., & Luo, X. (2020). Writing research questions and hypotheses: A genre-based investigation into writers’ linguistic resources in social sciences. ESP Today, 8(2), 206-226.
Lin, L., & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 150-160.
Liu, M. S. M., & Lim, J. M. H. (2014). How do writers evaluate their own empirical research? A genre-based inquiry into economics journal papers. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 134, 13-22.
Loi, C. K., Evans, M.S., Lim, J. M. H., & Akkakoson, S. (2016). A comparison between Malay and English research article discussions: A move analysis. SAGE Open, 6(2), 1-11.
Loi, C. K., & Lim, J. M. H. (2019). Hedging in the discussion sections of English and Malay educational research articles. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(1), 36-61.
Lung, J. (2011). Discursive hierarchical patterning in economics cases. English for Specific Purposes, 30(2), 138–149.
Mitchell, R., & Taylor, M. (1979). The integrating perspective: An audience-response model for writing. College English, 41(3), 247-271.
Mur-Dueñas, P. (2012). A corpus-based analysis of two crucial steps in business management research articles: The creation of a research space and the statement of limitations. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 11(1), 55-77.
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138.
Omidian, T., Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Biber, D. (2021). A new multidimensional model of writing for research publication: An analysis of disciplinarity, intra-textual variation, and L1 versus LX expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 1-20.
Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 25-38.
Paxton, M. (2007). Tensions between textbook pedagogy and the literacy practices of the disciplinary community: A study of writing in first year economics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 109-125.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479-497.
Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139-160.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.
Shehzad, W. (2008). Move two: Establishing a niche. Iberica, 15, 25–50.
Soler-Monreal, C., Carbonell-Olivares M., & Gil-Salom, L. (2011). A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 4-17.
Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 327-341.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres. Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tessuto, G. (2015). Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and interdiscursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes, 37(1), 13-26.
Weissberg, R., & Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research. Experimental research report writing for students of English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Xu, X., & Nesi, H. (2019). Evaluation in international research articles: A comparison of the strategies used by Chinese and British authors. Text & Talk, 39(6), 33-53.
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from Results to Conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385.
Ye, Y. (2019). Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in energy engineering research articles written by Chinese expert writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 48-61.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2021-2703-02
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157