Rhetorical Structure of Introduction Chapters written by Novice Vietnamese TESOL postgraduates

Loan Thi Thuy Nguyen, Issra Pramoolsook

Abstract


It is generally agreed that writing a thesis is a challenging task for both native and non-native English speaking students. Despite a considerable number of studies on this specific genre elsewhere, there is a scarcity of work in Vietnam to help TESOL students to write a thesis. Furthermore, the Introduction is considered one of two most difficult chapters to write. This paper, therefore, presents a study on the rhetorical structure of Introduction chapters of twelve M.A. theses from the three universities in the South of Vietnam. Employing the modified CARS’ model by Bunton (2002), the results showed that three moves and 15 steps were employed by this group of non-native English writers despite the fact that they had little or no formal instruction on how to write this genre. Additionally, a new step was also identified in this corpus. These findings reflect Vietnamese students’ ability to conform to the norms and to adapt the norms to suit cultural expectations. This paper proposes practical implications for teaching this particular group of novice writers in Vietnam as well as in settings with similar cultural values on how to compose the Introduction section.

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2014-2001-05


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.

Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp.

-75). London: Pearson Education Limited.

Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of Ph.D. conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 207-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.004

Callaghan, M., & Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching Factual Writing: A Genre-Based Approach. Metropolitan East

Disadvantaged Schools Program.

Chen, T.-Y., & Kuo, C.-H. (2012). A genre-based analysis of the information structure of master's theses in applied linguistics. The Asian ESP Journal, 8(1), 24-52.

Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a Validated Analysis of Scientific Text Structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57 doi:10.1093/applin/7.1.57

Dong, Y. R. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students

and their advisors from two U.S. institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369-390. doi: 10.1016/s0889-4906(97)00054-9

Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of M.Sc. dissertations. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text (pp. 128-145). Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.

Dudley-Evans, T. (1999). The dissertation: A case of neglect? In P. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in EAP writing research and instruction (pp. 28-36). UK: CALS.

Hewings, M. (1993). The end! How to conclude a dissertation. In G. Blue (Ed.), Language, learning and success: Studying through English. Review of English language teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 105-112). London: Macmillan.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific

Purposes, 24(3), 269-292. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Writing research articles in English: Microbiology. Journal of the Falculty of Arts, 29, 174-208.

Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16(1-2), 1-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x

Kwan, B. S. C. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 30-55. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001

Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice.

English for Specific Purposes, 21(2), 125-143. doi: 10.1016/s0889-4906(00)00025-9

Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions.

Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005

Shaw, P. (1991). Science research students' composing processes. English for Specific Purposes, 10(3), 189-206.

Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of articles introductions: Birmingham: University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. (2004). Research Genres: Exploration and application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, P. (1999). Exploring the contexts of writing: Interviews with Ph.D. supervisors. In P. Thompson

(Ed.), Issues in EAP writing research and instruction (pp. 37-54): Reading, UK: CALS.

Thompson, P. (2005). Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in Ph.D. theses. Journal of English for

Academic Purposes, 4(4), 307-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.006

Zhang, J. (2012). A cross-cultural study of generic structure and linguistic patterns in M.A. thesis

acknowledgements. The Asian ESP Journal, 8(1), 141-165.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157