Binary Logistic Regression Analysis of Instructional Leadership Factors Affecting English Language Literacy in Primary Schools

Jarrod Sio, Ramlee Ismail

Abstract


This paper discusses the factors contributing to student achievement in English language literacy in primary schools within Sibu division, Sarawak, Malaysia. The study involved 694 teachers who taught in 105 lower primary schools. Binary logistic regression was applied to predict the instructional leadership’s influence on student achievement in literacy. The findings revealed that one dimension of instructional leadership - supervising and evaluating instruction - emerged as strong predictors of literacy. The result indicated that schools were more than 17 times more likely to achieve 100% literacy rate when the instruction processes were supervised and evaluated by the headmasters. Supervision and evaluation of instruction had a positive influence on students’ achievement for English language literacy, hence making this a possible course of action for school heads. More comprehensive studies are needed to ascertain its consistency as well as investigating other predictors for literacy.  

 

Keywords:  Instructional leadership; literacy; binary logistic regression; LINUS2.0


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alam, A. & Ahmad, M. (2017). The impact of instructional leadership, professional communities and extra responsibilities for teachers on student achievement. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 31(3), 383-395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2015-0126

April, D. & Bouchamma, Y. (2015). Teacher supervision practices and principals’ characteristics. Alberta Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 61, 329-346.

Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and challenges of English language education reform in Malaysian primary schools. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 22(3), 65-78. doi: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2203-05

Baloglu, N. (2012). Relations between value-based leadership and distributed leadership: a casual research on school principles’ behaviors. Educational sciences: theory and practice. Vol. 12(2), 1375-1378.

Behrman, J.R., Parker, S.W., Todd, P.E. & Wolpin, K.I. (2015). Aligning learning incentives of students and teachers: Results from a social experiment in Mexican high schools. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 123(2), 325-364. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/675910.

Bendikson, L., Robinson, V. & Hattie, J. (2012), Principal instructional leadership and secondary school performance. Set: Research Information for Teachers. Vol 1, 2-8.

Blackmore, J. (2017). ‘In the shadow of men’: The historical construction of educational administration as a ‘masculinist’ enterprise. Gender matters in educational administration and policy. 27-48.

Bokhari, R., Md Rashid, S. & Chan, S.H. (2016). Teachers’ Perception on the Implementation of the Literacy, Numeracy and Screening (LINUS LBI2.0). Malaysian Journal of ELT Research. Vol. 11(1), 108-121.

Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B. & Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 18(3), 34–64.

Bosker, R., de Vos, H. & Witziers, B. (2000). Theories and models of educational effectiveness. Paper presented at AERA conference 2000, New Orleans, United States.

Brandon, J., Hollweck, T., Donlevy, J.K. & Whalen, C. (2018). Teacher supervision and evaluation challenges: Canadian perspectives on overall instructional leadership. Teachers and Teaching. Vol. 24(3), 263-280. doi:

https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1425678

Brophy, J. (2013). Motivating Students to Learn. New York: Routledge.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. London: Open University Press.

Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S. & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Chen, J. & Guo, W. (2018). Emotional intelligence can make a difference: The impact of principals’ emotional intelligence on teaching strategy mediated by instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 1-24. doi: 10.1177/1741143218781066

City, E. (2009). Instructional Rounds in Education: a Network Approach to Improving Teaching and Learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Cohen, D., Raudenbush, S. & Ball, D. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Vol. 25(2), 1-24.

Danielson, D. (2011). Evaluations that help teachers learn. Educational

leadership. Vol. 69(2), 36-41.

Derrington, M.L. & Angelle, P.S. (2013). Teacher leadership and collective efficacy: connections and links. International Journal of Teacher Leadership. Vol. 4(1).

De Vos, M. (2011). Quantitative and qualitative aspects of education in South Africa: An analysis using the National Income Dynamic Study. Stellenbosch Economic Working Papers (No. 06/2011).

DiPaola, M. F. & Hoy, W. K. (2014). Improving Instruction Through Supervision, Evaluation, and Professional Development. Information Age Publishing.

Duyar, I.T., Mina, D.K. & Owoh, S.J. (2019). Promoting student creative problem-solving skills: Do principal instructional leadership and teacher creative practices matter? Vocational Identity and Career Construction in Education. 78-99.

Dweck, C. (2017). Summary of Carol S. Dweck’s Mindset: Key Takeaways & Analysis. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Dweck, C.S., Walton, G.M. & Cohen, G.L. (2011). Academic Tenacity: Mindsets and Skills that Promote Long Term Learning. Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Elmore, R. (2004). School Reform from the Inside Out: Policy, Practice, and Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London, Great Britain: Sage Publications Limited.

Fryer, R.G. (2011). Financial incentives and student achievement: Evidence from randomized trials. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1-44. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr045

Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: Systems thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Gay, L., Mills. G. & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (9th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Eun, S.K. & Miller, R. (2015). A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Roles of Instructional Leadership, Teacher Collaboration, and Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Support of Student Learning, American Journal of Education. Vol.121(4), 501-530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/681925

Goddard, Y. L., Neumerski, C., Goddard, R. D., Salloum, S. & Berebitsky, D. (2010). A multilevel exploratory study of the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of principals’ instructional support and group norms for instruction in elementary schools. Elementary School Journal. Vol. 111(2), 336-357.

Grissom, J.A., Loeb, S. & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher. Vol. 20(10), 1-12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X13510020

Gurley, K.D., Anast-May, L., O’Neal, M., Lee, H. & Shores, M. (2015). Instructional leadership behaviors in principals who attended an assistant principals’ academy: Self-reports and teacher perceptions. Planning and Changing. Vol. 46(1), 127-157.

Gurley, K.D., Anast-May, L., O’Neal, M. & Dozier, R. (2016). Principal instructional leadership behaviors: Teacher vs. self- perceptions. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation. Vol. 11(1).

Hadzir, N., Alias, A.M., Kamaruzaman, A.L. & Mohd Yusof, H.M. (2016). Teachers’ perception on literacy, numeracy and screening (LINUS2.0) assessment features based on year 1 students’ performance. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL). Vol. 4(1), 2321-3108.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.): Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

Hall, P. (2019). The instructional leader’s most difficult job. Educational Leadership. Vol. 76(6), 12-17.

Hallinger, P. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 47(2), 271–306.

Hallinger, P., Bickman, L. & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal. Vol.96(5), 527–549.

Hallinger, P., Adams, D., Harris, A. & Suzette Jones, M. (2018). Review of conceptual models and methodologies in research on principal instructional leadership in Malaysia. Journal of Educational Administration.

Vol.56(1), 104–126. doi:10.1108/jea-03-2017-0025

Hallinger, P. & Hosseingholizadeh, R. (2019). Exploring instructional leadership in Iran: A mixed methods study of high- and low-performing principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–22. doi: 10.1177/1741143219836684

Hallinger, P., Hosseingholizadeh, R., Hashemi, M. & Kouhsari. M. (2017). Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. Vol. 46(5), 800-819. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143217700283

Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Vol. 9(2), 157-191.

Hallinger, P. & Lee, M. (2014). Mapping instructional leadership in Thailand: Has education reform impacted principal practice? Education Management Administration & Leadership. Vol. 42(6). Doi: 10.1177/1741143213502196.

Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. F. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal. 217-247.

Hallinger, P., Walker, A., Nguyen, D.T.H., Truong, T. & Nguyen, T.T. (2017). Perspectives on principal instructional leadership in Vietnam: a preliminary model. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 55(2), 222-239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2015-0106

Harris, A., Jones, M., Adams, D. & Cheah, K. (2018): Instructional leadership in Malaysia: a review of the contemporary literature, School Leadership & Management. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2018.1453794

Harris, A., Jones, M., Soon, K.L.C., Devadason, E. & Adams, D. (2017) Exploring principals’ instructional leadership practices in Malaysia:

insights and implications, Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 55 (2), 207-221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2016-0051

Heck, R. H., Larson, T. & Marcoulides, G. (1990). Instructional leadership and student achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 26(2), 94–125.

Hendriks, M. & Steen, R. (2012). Results from school leadership effectiveness studies (2005–2010). In J. Scheerens (Ed.), School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta-analysis of empirical studies (pp. 65-129). New York: Springer.

Hopkins, D. (2013). Instructional leadership and school improvement. Effective leadership for school improvement. 65-81.

Huber, S. G. & Muijs, D. (2010). School leadership effectiveness: The growing insight in the importance of school leadership for the quality and development of schools and their pupils. In S. G. Huber (Ed.), School leadership—International perspectives (pp. 57-77). New York: Springer.

Ismail, S.N., Don, Y., Husin, F. & Khalid, R. (2018). Instructional leadership and teachers’ functional competency across the 21st century learning. International Journal of Instruction. Vol. 11(3), 135-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11310a

Jamelaa Bibi Abdullah & Jainabee Md Kassim. (2011). Instructional Leadership and Attitude Towards Organizational Change Among Secondary Schools Principal in Pahang, Malaysia. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol.15, 3304-3309.

Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities, Educational and Psychological Measurement. Vol. 30, 607-610.

Labone, E. (2004). Teacher efficacy: maturing the construct through research in alternative paradigms. Teaching and Teacher Education. Vol. 20, 341–359. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.013.

Lee, M., Hallinger, P. & Walker, A. (2012). A distributed perspective on instructional leadership in international Baccalaureate (IB) schools. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 48(4), 664-698.

Lee, M., Walker, A. & Chui Y.K. (2012). Contrasting effects of instructional leadership practices on student learning in a high accountability context. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 50 (5), 586 - 611. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578231211249835

Leithwood, K., Harris, A. & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful leadership. School Leadership and Management. Vol. 28(1), 27-42.

Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 20(10), 1-33.

Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Minnesota: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota.

Liang, X.Y., Kidwai, H. & Zhang, M.X. (2016). How Shanghai does It: insights and lessons from the highest-ranking education system in the world. Washington DC: World Bank.

Marks, H.M. & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: Integrating transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 39(3), 370-397.

Marzano, R.J., Frontier, T. & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Maslowski, R. (2001) School Culture and School Performance: An Explorative Study into the Organizational Culture of Secondary Schools and their Effects. Endschede, The Netherlands: Twente University Press.

McGhee, M. W. & Lew, C. (2007). Leadership and writing: How principals’ knowledge, beliefs, and interventions affect writing instruction in elementary and secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 43(3), 358-38.

McNeil, K.L., Lowenhaupt, R.J. & Katsch-Singer, R. (2018). Instructional leadership in the era of the NGSS: Principals’ understandings of science practices. Science Education. Vol.102(3), 452-473. doi: https://doi.org1-.1002/sce.21336

Ministry of Education (2013). Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.

Mokhtari, K., Thoma, J. & Edwards, P. (2009) How One Elementary School Uses Data to Help Raise Students’ Reading Achievement. The Reading Teacher. Vol. 63(4), 334-337.

Musliman, R., Ariffin, S.R. & Din, R. (2013). Assessing students’ spatial intelligence for literacy and numeracy skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 90, 695-701.

Nazariyah Sani & Abdul Rahman Idris. (2012). Implementation of LINUS Programme Based on the Model of Van Meter and Van Horn. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science. Vol.1(2).

Neumerski, C.M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teachers, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational administration quarterly. Vol.49(2), 310-347.

Neumerski, C.M., Grissom, J.A., Goldring, E., Drake, T.A., Rubin, M., Cannata, M. & Schuermann, P. (2018). Restructuring Instructional Leadership: How Multiple-Measure Teacher Evaluation Systems Are Redefining the Role of the School Principal, The Elementary School Journal. Vol.119(2), 270-297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/700597

Ng, D., Nguyen, T. D. & Wong, K. S. B., & Choy, K. W. W. (2015). Instructional leadership practices in Singapore. School Leadership and Management. Vol. 35(4), 388–407.

Noman, M., Awang Hashim, R. & Shaik Abdullah, S. (2018). Contextual leadership practices: The case of the successful school principal in Malaysia. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. Vol. 46(3), 474-490.

Ong, C. H. & Dimmock, C. (2013). Principals’ Engagement of Low Ability Students in Singapore Secondary Schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Vol. 41 (2), 214–232.

doi:10.1177/1741143212468345.

Owens, R. (2010). New schools of thought: Developing thinking and learning communities. International Journal of Learning. Vol. 17(6), 43–54.

Pan, H. L. W., Nyeu, F. Y. & Cheng, S.H. (2017). Leading school for learning: Principal practices in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 55(2), 168–185.

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual; A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed). Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

Pashiardis, P. & Johansson, O. (eds) (2016). Successful School Leadership: International Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Powell, A., Farrar, E. & Cohen, D. (1986). The shopping mall high school: winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

Printy, S., Marks, H. M. & Bowers, A. J. (2009). Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share instructional influence. Journal of School Leadership. Vol. 19(5), 504-532.

Qian, H., Walker, A. & Li, X. (2017). The west wind vs the east wind: instructional leadership model in China. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol.55(2), 186–206. doi:10.1108/jea-08-2016-0083

Rahmah Murshidi , Mohd Majid Konting, Habibah Elias & Foo Say Fooi (2006). Sense of Efficacy Among Beginning Teachers in Sarawak. Teaching Education. Vol. 17(3), 265-275. doi: 10.1080/10476210600849730

Range, B.G., Hewitt, P. & Young, S. (2014). Principals’ perceived supervisory behaviors regarding marginal teachers in two states. Administrative Issues Journal. Vol. 4(1). doi: https://dc.swosu.edu/aij/vol4/iss1/9

Range, B.G., Scherz, S., Holt, C.R. & Young, S. (2011). Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. Vol. 23(3), 243-265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9123-5

Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A. & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol.44, 635–674.

Saarivirta. T. & Kumpulainen, K. (2016). School autonomy, leadership and student achievement: reflections from Finland. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 30(7), 1268-1278. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2015-0146

Salo, P., Nylund, J. & Stjernstrøm, E. (2015). On the practice architectures of instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. Vol. 43(4), 490–506

Sammons, P., Hillman, J., Mortimore, P. (1995). Key Characteristics of Effective Schools: A Review of School Effectiveness Research. London: OFSTED.

Samuddin, K. M. & Krish, P. (2018). English Orthographic Depth among Malay Learners at a Primary School. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 24(1), 56–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2401-05

Schatzer, R.H., Caldarella, P., Hallam, P.R. & Brown, L.B. (2013). Comparing the effects of instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement: Implications for practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Vol. 42(4).

Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Schneider, M., Huss-Lederman, S. & Sherlock, W. (2012). Charting new waters: Collaborating for school improvement in U.S. high schools. TESOL Journal. Vol. 3, 373–401. doi:10.1002/tesj.26

Shaked, H. & Benoliel, P.S. (2019). Instructional boundary management: The complementarity of instructional leadership and boundary management, Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143219846905

Smith, M. S. & O’Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-268). Philadelphia, PA:Falmer.

Steinbacher-Reed, C. & Rotella, S.A. (2017). Windows into instructional practice. Educational Leadership. Vol. 74(8), 68-72.

Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P. & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and Learning. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 46(1), 31-56.

Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S. & Reynolds, D. (2000). In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.). Context issues within school effectiveness research. International handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 160–183). London: Routledge.

Trani, R.K. & Irvine, R.K. (2010). Fallacies in education: Why schools are mired in mediocrity. Rowman & Littlefield Education, Maryland.

Tubah, H. & Hamid, Z. (2011). The Influence of Demography on Reading and Comprehension Skills of LINUS Pupils. Malay Journal. Vol.6, 29-47.

Tulowitzki, T. (2019). Supporting instructional leadership and school improvement? Reflections on school supervision from a German perspective. Journal of Educational Administration. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2019-0040

Tuytens, M. & Devos, G. (2017). Teacher evaluation policy as perceived by school principals: the case of Flanders (Belgium). Teachers and

Teaching. Vol. 24(3), 209–222. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1397508

Tyack, D. & Hansot, E. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Urtel, M. & Vogel, N. (2011). K-12 Physical education: the principal perspective. National Teacher Education Journal. Vol. 4(1).

Walker, J. & Slear, S. (2011). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on the efficacy of new and experienced middle school teachers. NASSP Bulletin. Vol. 95(1), 46-64.

Wery, J. & Thomson, M.M. (2013). Motivational strategies to enhance effective learning in teaching struggling students. Support for Learning. Vol. 28(3), 103-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12027

Wheelan, S. & Kesselring, J. (2005). Link between faculty group development and elementary student performance on standardized tests. The Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 98(6), 323–330.

Witziers, B., Bosker, R. & Kruger, M. (2003) Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 39(3), 398–423.

Wilson, D. L. (2011). Successful educational leadership at high performing schools. US-China Education Review. Vol. 8(3), 393-398.

Wynne, J. (2005). Teachers as leaders in education reform: Testimonies of transformation. In J. K. Dowdy (Ed.), Readers of the Quilt: Essays on Being Black, Female, and Literate (pp. 3-33). New Jersey: Hampton Press.

Youngs, P. (2007). How elementary principals’ beliefs and actions influence new teachers’ experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 43(1), 101-137.

Zepeda, S. J. (2016). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts. Routledge: New York.

Zhu, Y. & Leung, F.K.S. (2011). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Vol. 9(5), 1189-1212.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2502-02

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157

https://jurnal.unikal.ac.id/

SITUS TOTO

Toto 4D

SLOT GACOR

SLOT GACOR

NANA4D

NANA4D

NANA4D

SLOT88

NANA4D

SLOT88

SLOT88

SITUS TOTO

SITUS TOTO

https://choicemg.com/

Untuk artikel-artikel serupa dan berbagai topik menarik lainnya, silakan eksplorasi lebih lanjut di Angkerzone.com.

Committed to creating a positive impact beyond returns, Barito Renewables integrates ESG principles into its core business objectives. They prioritize public health, safety, and community respect while making critical investments in clean energy. More about their ESG approach can be found at baritorenewables.org.

PT Pantai Indah Kapuk Dua, Tbk (PANI) adalah pengembang properti terkemuka di Indonesia yang berkomitmen menghadirkan inovasi cemerlang dan mengoptimalkan sumber daya untuk menciptakan keunggulan kompetitif bagi para pemangku kepentingan. Informasi lebih lanjut mengenai visi korporasi mereka dapat diakses di pantaiindahkapukdua.org.

Commuter Indonesia menghadirkan layanan transportasi kereta api yang terintegrasi untuk mendukung mobilitas berkualitas bagi para pengguna. Informasi lengkap mengenai jadwal, tarif, dan rute perjalanan KRL dapat diakses di situs resmi mereka: commuterindonesia.org.

Informasi Publik

PANI First Quarter 2023

Becoming leading property developer in Indonesia with brilliant innovations to optimize our resources into competitive advantange in order to restore back to stakeholders

Board - of Director

History · PT Pantai Indah Kapuk Dua, Tbk · Office · Recent News. Ada Update dari PIK2 (PANI), Aguan Turut Buka Suara. Emiten Agung Sedayu dan Salim Grup

Nomination & Remuneration Committee Member

Audit Committee Members

Vision & Mission

Projects

Bizpark PIK 2

Event

Internal Audit Members

Soho Riverside Boulevard

Environment

Prospectus

Barito Renewables: Penawaran Saham Perdana

Keterbukaan Informasi

Information Disclosure

Harga Saham

Struktur Organisasi

3M-2026 Financial Performance Results

https://kaiwisata.org/

https://www.tugureasuransi.com/

diponegorouniversity.com

https://bandunginstitute.com/

Website resmi KAI Commuter

Commuter Advertising

Pemesanan tiket juga dapat dilakukan melalui Aplikasi Access by KAI (yang juga dapat diakses untuk layanan kereta api bandara oleh KAI Bandara ) dan situs resmi pemesanan tiket oleh KAI Commuter. Metode pembayaran yang tersedia pada https://airport-train.commuterindonesia.org/

Temukan beragam jurnal ilmiah terakreditasi dan terindeks internasional yang mendukung transisi energi dan pembangunan berkelanjutan di Indonesia melalui Portal Jurnal Barito Renewables.

Jelajahi publikasi akses terbuka dari berbagai disiplin ilmu, mulai dari pendidikan bahasa hingga energi panas bumi, yang dikelola dalam satu platform terintegrasi di Barito Renewables Journal Platform.

Dukung riset dan inovasi menuju target emisi nol bersih Indonesia dengan mengakses kumpulan jurnal berkualitas tinggi yang tersedia di Jurnal & Publikasi Barito Renewables.

Tempat terbaik untuk menemukan penelitian terbaru tentang energi terbarukan, pendidikan, dan ilmu sosial, yang dikurasi dalam portal jurnal profesional dari Barito Renewables Open Journal System.

Jelajahi kumpulan jurnal akademik yang berkomitmen pada penyebaran penelitian dan kreasi artistik, berdasarkan prinsip dan nilai humanisme, di Portal de Revistas TempoSCAN.

Temukan publikasi ilmiah dari berbagai disiplin ilmu yang mendorong refleksi kritis dan peningkatan pengajaran berkelanjutan, hanya di Portal Jurnal TempoSCAN.

Portal resmi untuk mengakses produksi pengetahuan dan karya analitis dari komunitas akademik dan seni nasional maupun internasional, dikelola oleh TempoSCAN Academic Journals.

Wadah publikasi yang bergantung pada Direktorat Riset dan Pascasarjana, menyediakan akses terbuka ke jurnal-jurnal unggulan di TempoSCAN Journal Portal.

Dilansir dari laman resmi rekrutmen KAI, berikut persyaratan atau kriteria pelamar yang wajib dipenuhi untuk mendaftar lowongan kerja KAI 2026

BINUS UNIVERSITY

Portal Kaiwisata

HRIS Frontliner | KAI Wisata

KAI Services memiliki bidang usaha dengan 2 Core Business yaitu Coverage Service dan Cleaning Building Service yang memiliki Brand Resclean. Resclean Bergerak dalam Bidang Kebersihan yang meliputi Kebersihan dan Keindahan Stasiun (K2), On Trip Cleaning, dan Petugas Cuci Kereta

KAI Services memiliki salah satu bidang usaha dengan Core Business On Board Services yang bernama Restaurant On Train, dengan Branding Kuliner Kereta yang bertugas Mengelola dan Melayani penjualan Makan dan Minum di Setiap Perjalanan Kereta Api.

BINUS Journal – BINUS Higher Education

https://mercubuana-yogya.id/

https://baa.mercubuana-yogya.id/

https://pmb.mercubuana-yogya.id/

https://sso.mercubuana-yogya.id/

https://sia.mercubuana-yogya.id/

https://radenfatah.org/

https://univgadjahmada.com/

https://etd.repository.univgadjahmada.com/

Owner: Sanji

TOGEL

SITUS TOTO

SITUS SLOT

SEPAK BOLA

SEJARAH

Esport

Fakta Unik

Berita Dunia

NANA4D

NANA4D

Menu KFC

Kopi Kenangan

biznet home

PILIHAN SOLUSI LAYANAN INTERNET

Richeese

NANA4D

momoyo

susu cimory

Flip

kasir pintar

nana4d

Harga Berdu

KAI

KAI

NANA4D

Tencent

Cakap

NANA4D

NANA4D

Quipper School Premium

Harvard

NANA4D

NANA4D

NANA4D

NANA4D

NANA4D

ROKOKBET

slot200

Jordan Nike

NANA4D

NANA4D

Bali

TOTO

ROKOKBET

NANA4D

NANA4D

NANA4D

TOTO

NANA4D

NANA4D

ROKOKBET

ROKOKBET

NANA4D

NANA4D

NANA4D

NANA4D

ROKOKBET

NANA4D

https://pemejournal.net

NANA4D

Cek Resi

NANA4D

NANA4D

NANA4D

ROKOKBET

NANA4D

https://floridacomputerhospital.com

https://expresswebz.com

https://ctpcr.org

https://nipngr.org

ROKOKBET

ROKOKBET

https://vasstuviswanath.com

https://researchcell.bkmc.edu.pk

https://mentor.bkmc.edu.pk

https://rcportal.bkmc.edu.pk

https://qec.bkmc.edu.pk

https://test.bkmc.edu.pk

https://researchcell.bkmc.edu.pk

https://apmp.agenciamoustache.com.br

https://policabos.agenciamoustache.com.br

https://ebdi.agenciamoustache.com.br

NANA4D