The paper briefly surveys contemporary studies in the field of secondary nomination and idiom comprehension in discourse. The research mainly focuses on the inferential processes which occur at the moment of perceiving a discourse containing an idiom. Although the inference phenomenon has received much attention in recent years, the majority of scientific works on the topic are targeted at the inferential processes in text comprehension while such a challenging area as inference in secondary nomination remains unrevealed. The aim of the present study is to find out if the traces of inferences in the metaphoric meaning of an idiom can interfere in the comprehension of a discourse complicated by an idiom. Thus, the study presents an analysis of idiom comprehension in a narrative discourse that lies in both fields of inference study: inference in secondary nomination and inference in discourse comprehension. For this purpose, the paper gives an outline to the theories which explain some mechanisms of inference action and presents an analysis of some pieces of narrative discourse from the perspectives of the discussed theories. The research is conducted on Russian and English language material. The results of the study point to the double mapping of the inferential processes that is  caused, on the one hand, by the inferential traces of secondary nomination and, on the other hand, by the implicit sense of an idiom in  discourse. The paper presents a model of conceptual integration in the process of double inference while comprehending a text complicated by an idiom.    

Keywords: discourse; implication; inference; nomination; idiom

Alefirenko, N. F. (2008). Phraseology and Cognitive Science in the Aspect of Linguistic Postmodernism. Belgorod: Belgorod State University Press.

Alefirenko, N. F. (2015). Cognitive-semiotic mechanisms of phraseme building. Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 66(2), 81-99.

Baranov, A. N. (2008). The Aspects of the Theory of Phraseology. Moscow: Znak Press.

Bergen, L., Levy, R. & Goodman, N. (2016). Pragmatic reasoning through semantic inference. Semantics and Pragmatics, Vol. 9 (20), 1-83.

Cacciari, Cr. & Levoranto, M. Ch. (1998). The effect of semantic analyzability of idioms in metalinguistic tasks. Metaphor and Symbol, Vol. 13(3), 159-177.

Dobrovol’skij, D. O. (2014). On the semantic structure of idioms. In V. Durante (Eds.), Fraseología y paremiología: enfoques y aplicaciones (pp. 23-32). Madrid: Instituto Cervantes.

Emets, T. V., Baryshnikova, Yu. V., Trutnev, A. Yu., Suvorova, E. V. & Akhmetzyanova, T. L. (2018). Logical and linguistic strategies for translating complex sentences in literary texts of natural languages. XLinguae. Vol. 11(2), 3-16.

Fauconnier, G. (2010). Ten Lectures on Cognitive Construction of Meaning. Beijing: Foreign Language teaching and research Press.

Gibbs, R. W., Jr. & Colston H. L. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge University Press.

Goldman, S. R., McCarthy, K. S. & Burkett, C. (2015). Interpretative inferences in literature. In E. J. O’Brien, A.E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 386-415). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Gvozdarev, Yu. A. (2010). The bases of Russian Phrase-formation. Rostov-on-Don: Logos Press.

Harvey, D. Y. (2014). Semantic inference in language production and comprehension: Same or separable loci? PhD thesis. Rice University. Retrieved September 17, 2017 from https://hdl.handle.net/1911/77166.pdf

Jaufillaili, J., Sujatna, E. T. S., Indira, D. & Indrayani, L. M. (2017). Vague Languages Implied through Disparagement Functions in Comic Strips. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 23(4), 66– 76.

Kopylenko, M. M. (1978). Essays on the General Phraseology. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Press.

Kubrjakova, E. S. (2004). Language and Knowledge: on the Road of Gaining Knowledge About Language: Arts of Speech From the Cognitive Point of View. Мoscow: Languages of Slavonic Culture Press.

Noordman, L. G. M. & Vonk, W. (2015). Inference in discourse, psychology of. In J. D. Wright (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 37- 44). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Palacio, M. A. & Gustilo, L. (2016). A Pragmatic Analysis of Discourse Particles in Filipino Computer Mediated Communication GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, Vol. 16(3), 1-19.

Peregrin, J. (2014). Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter? UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Suvorova, E. V. & Polyakova, L. S. (2018). Types of inferences in discourse. Arab World English Journal. Vol. 9(1), 294-306.

Teliya, V. N. (1996). Russian Phraseology: Semantic, Pragmatic, Linguistic and Cultural Aspects. Мoscow: Languages of Slavonic Culture Press.

Yeari, M. & van den Broek, P. (2015). The role of textual semantic constraints in knowledge-based inference generation during reading comprehension: A computational approach. Memory. Vol. 23(8), 1193-214.

Yeganehjoo, M. & Thai, Y. N. (2012). Lexical access in production of idioms by proficient L2 learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 18(1), 87-104.