Implementation and Challenges of English Language Education Reform in Malaysian Primary Schools

Hazita Azman

Abstract


This article elucidates the implementation of English as a second language (ESL) learning and teaching programmes at the primary school level, spanning three decades of English language education (ELE) in Malaysia, its reform initiatives as well as the arising realities. The realities highlighted underscore the paradoxical challenges experienced with each ELE reform that are introduced, arising from the multilingual and plural socio-political circumstances of the country. In particular, among recent reforms that are examined, is the consequence that the new Primary School Standards-Based Curriculum for English language education (SBELC), which was introduced in 2011, has on the literacy performance of year three pupils when they sit for the LINUS LBI (literacy and Numeracy Screening for English Literacy) test, and the extent to which the English teachers and these young learners are ready to embrace the new curriculum. Concurrently, a review of the Malaysia Education Blueprint (2013-2025) as well as the Malaysia English Language Roadmap (2015-2025), is undertaken and their implications for yet another major language in education reform juxtaposed against existing problems related to teacher’s language proficiency, inadequate trained and skilled teachers, mismatch between curriculum and practices, limited language exposure, and most significantly, the foreboding view of the English language as a threat towards maintaining multilingual plurality, are duly extrapolated. By way of conclusion, this article draws upon selected innovative practices to illustrate the creative pathways that have emerged from these multifarious circumstances and have ironically shown potential in strengthening the young learners’ English language proficiency, notwithstanding identified impeding factors.

 

Keywords: ESL Literacy; English Language Education Reform; English Language Proficiency; Language in Education Policy; Primary Education


DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2203-05


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, S.Z., and Mutalib, A.A. (2015). Preliminary study: An investigation on learning assistance requirement among low achievers in Primary schools. International Journal of Computer Applications. Vol. 114(2), March, 48-54.

Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N. and Abdullah, M. K. K. (2012). Improving vocabulary learning in foreign language. International Journal of Learning and Development. Vol. 2(6), 186-201.

Ali, M. S. (2003). English language teaching in Primary schools: Policy and implementation concerns. IPBA E-Journal. 1-14. Retrieved on 28 March 2015 from https://kajianberasaskansekolah.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/article70.pdf

Azizah, Y., Nor Fariza, M. N. and Hazita, A. (2005). Teaching English the SMART way. The International Journal of English Language Learning and Teaching (IJELLT). Vol. 2(2), 11-22.

Baldauf, R.B., Kaplan, R.B., Kamwangamalu, N. and Bryant, P. (2011). Success or failure of primary second/foreign language programmes in Asia: What do the data tell us?. Current Issues in Language Planning. Vol. 12, 309-323.

Bokhari, R., Sabariah, M.R. & Chan, S.H. (2015). Teachers’ perception on the implementation of the Literacy and Numeracy Screening (LINUS LBI 2.0) programme among lower Primary ESL pupils. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research. Vol. 11(1), 108-121.

Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System. Vol. 35(4), 595-608.

Carnoy, M. (1999). Globalization and Educational Reform: What Planners Need to Know. International Institute for Educational Planning. UNESCO.

Curriculum Development Division (2011). Standard document of Primary school curriculum: Basic core module of English Language for National Schools. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Darmi, R. and Albion, P. (2013). English language in the Malaysian education system: Its existence and implications. 3rd Malaysian Postgraduate Conference (MPC2013) 4-5 July 2013, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, Paper ID: MPC2013-35, 175-183.

Don, Z. M., Abdullah, M. H., Abdullah, A. C., Lee, B. H., Kaur, K., Pillai, J. and Hooi, M. Y. (2015). English language education reform in Malaysia:

The roadmap 2015- 2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.

Gee, J. (1990). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London: The Falmer Press.

Government of Malaysia (GoM) (1961). Education Act of 1961. Kuala Lumpur.

Government of Malaysia (GoM) (1996). Vision 2020. Kuala Lumpur: ISIS Malaysia.

Government of Malaysia (GoM) (2001). Eighth Malaysia Plan 2001-2005. Putrajaya: Economic Planning Unit.

Government of Malaysia (GoM) (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint: 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Economic Planning Unit.

Government of Malaysia (GoM) (2016). Strategy Paper 10: Transforming Education System, 1-36. Putrajaya: Economic Planning Unit. Retrieved February 25, 2016 from http://www.rmk11.epu.gov.my/pdf/strategy-paper/Strategy

Hazita, A. (1999). Multilingual literacies in rural Malaysia: National goals and local practices. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Graduate School of Education, University of Western Australia.

Hazita, A. (2003). National needs and global goals in plural lingual setting: Implication for multilingual education. Proceedings for Solls-Intec 03, 16-18 Dec. Putrajaya.

Hazita, A. (2006). English language in rural Malaysia: Situating global literacies in local practices. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 11, 99-119.

Hazita, A. (2009). English in 1Malaysia: A paradox in rural pluri-literacy practices. Akademika. Vol. 76, 27-41.

Howell, J. (2012). Teaching with ICT: Digital Pedagogies for Collaboration and Creativity. South Melbourne, Vic.: Oxford University Press.

Mirzajani, H., Bayekolaei, M. D., Kookandeh, M. R., Razaee, S.S., Kamalifar, A. A. and Shani, H. R. (2016). Smart schools an innovation in Education: Malaysia’s experience. Asian Journal of Education and Training. Vol. 2(1), 11-15.

Hayes, D. (2014). Factors influencing success in teaching English in state Primary schools. British Council/E324.

Heath, S. B. (1991). The sense of being literate: Historical and cross-cultural features, in R. Barr, M. 1. Kamil, P. Mosenthal & P. Pearson (Eds.). Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 11. New York: Longman.

Kaplan, R.B., Baldauf, R.B. and Kamwangamalu, N. (2011). Why educational language plans sometimes fail. Current Issues in Language Planning. Vol. 12, 105-124.

Littlewood, W. (2013). Developing a Context-sensitive Pedagogy for Communication-oriented Language Teaching. English Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mahathir, M. (1991). Malaysia: The Way Forward. Paper presented at the Malaysian Business Council on 28 Feb. 1991. Kuala Lumpur.

Multimedia Development Corporation (MDec) (2006). Impact Assessment Studies on the Smart School Integrated Solution (SSIS) and other ICT Initiatives. Kuala Lumpur.

Musa, N., Khoo, Y. L. and Hazita, A. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, Special Section. Vol. 12(1), 35-51.

Ministry of Education Malaysia (MoE) (1983). Integrated English Language Syllabus. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development Centre.

Ministry of Education Malaysia (MoE) (2001). Primary School Integrated

English Language Syllabus. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development

Centre.

Ministry of Education Malaysia (MoE) (2012). National Education Policy (3rd Edition). Kuala Lumpur.

Ministry of Education Malaysia (MoE) (2014). Malaysian Education Blueprint Annual Report: 2014. Kuala Lumpur.

Ministry of Education Malaysia (MoE) (2015). Education For All 2015: National Review Report Malaysia. UNESCO.

Nation, P. (2005). Teaching vocabulary. Asian EFL Journal. Vol. 7(3), 47-54.

Noor, M. N. and Amir, Z. (2011). Exploring the vocabulary learning strategies of EFL learners. English Language Teaching. Vol.4 (2), June, 313-327.

Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 37, 589-613.

Pandian, A. (2002). English Language Teaching in Malaysia Today. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education. Vol. 22(2), 35-52.

Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21) (2007). Retrieved May 25, 2016 from http://www.p21.org

Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smart Schools: From Training Memories to Educating Minds. New York: The Free Press.

Selvaraj, B. (2010). English Language Teaching (ELT): Curriculum reforms in Malaysia. Voice of Academia. Vol. 5(1), 51-60.

Schmitt, N. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smart School Project Team (SSPT) (1997). Smart School Flagship Application: The Malaysia Smart School-A Conceptual Blueprint. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.

Street. B. (1994). Cross-cultural perspectives on literacy. In L. Verhoeven (Ed.). Functional literacy: Theoretical issues and educational implications (pp. 95-111). John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Sulaiman, T, M. Ayub, A.F. & Sulaiman, S. (2015). Curriculum change in English language curriculum advocates higher order thinking skills and standards-based assessments in Malaysian Primary schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, MCSER Publishing: Rome, Italy. Vol. 6(2), 494-500.

Teach For Malaysia. (2016). Retrieved May 25, 2016 from www.teachformalaysia.org/

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wong, F. F., Lee, K. S., Lee, S. K. and Azizah, Y. (2010). English use as an identity marker among Malaysian undergraduates. 3L: Journal of Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature. Vol. 18(1), 145-155.

Zawiyah Y., Noraini M.Y., Noraini I. and Zarina O. (2015). Your Language My Culture: Teacher Guide. Yayasan DiRaja Sultan Mizan: Terengganu.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157