The Role of Personal Factors in 'Communication Mobility' Development of Thai and Russian Professionals in BELF Context

Olga Marina, Krich Rajprasit

Abstract


With the aim of attempting to attain particular communicative goals, Communication Mobility (CM) can be viewed as one of the key elements in the complex construct of professional communicative competence in terms of oral English proficiency. CM has been proposed as an ability to employ a set of specific communicative strategies to facilitate professional communication, particularly among non-native English speakers. This preliminary study aims to identify perceived CM levels among Thai and Russian professionals working in international companies; to investigate possible correlation between personal factors (i.e. age, work experience, their perceived level of oral English proficiency, frequency of their attendance at meetings conducted in English, and frequency of English usage in their workplace) and CM; to compare these factors and the conditions in which CM may be developed among these two groups; and to predict the possibility of the development of CM. A quantitative method was employed and responses to the specifically designed questionnaire were obtained from 60 participants. The findings revealed that Russian participants were rated as very good users of CM, while Thai participants were only rated as fair CM users. In general terms, for both groups, only the frequency of English language use in the workplace was found to correlate with the perceived CM. The frequency of English language use in their workplaces was the only factor for the Thai participants to predict the development of CM. Such findings help in designing ESP courses which attempt to simulate workplace communicative situations, often seen as problematic and uncertain.

 

Keywords: communication strategies; communication mobility; workplace communication; Business English as a Lingua Franca; personal factors


DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2202-12


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Balykina, G. (2015). Intercultural Aspect of Russian Business Negotiation Practices. Retrieved June 13, 2015 from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2577188

Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication strategies. Oxford: Blackwell.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the Role of Communicative Competence. In E. AlcónSoler and M.P. SafontJordà (eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning. Springer, 41-57.

Chitpupakdi, S. (2014). A Needs Analysis of Thai Executives’ English Proficiency: A Case Study of Carpets International Thailand Limited. Unpublished M.A. thesis, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.

Chuanchaisit, S. & Prapphal, K. (2009). A Study of English Communication Strategies of Thai University Students. Manusya: Journal of Humanities. Vol. 17, 100-126.

Cook, V. J. (1993). Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Dewaele, J. M., Petrides, K. V. & Furnham, A. (2008). Effects of Trait Emotional Intelligence and Sociobiographical Variables on Communicative Anxiety and Foreign Language Anxiety among Adult Multilinguals: A Review and Empirical Investigation. Language and Learning. Vol. 59, 911-960.

Dӧrnyei, Z. & Scott, M. L. (1995). Communication Strategies: What Are They and What Are They Not? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL), Long Beach, California, USA.

Epifanova, S. & Hild, A. (2015). Contemporary Issues in Cross-Cultural Business Interaction amongst Office and Managerial Staff in Thailand. UTCC International Journal of Business and Economics. Vol. 7(1), 131-145.

Ezeiza, J. (2009) Communicative Competence in Experimental Sciences Degrees within the Framework of the New European Space for Higher Education. Iberica. Vol. 18, 131-152.

Harris, R. (1987). Reading Saussure: A Critical Commentary on the ‘Cours Delinguistique Générale’. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

Izumi S., Shiwaku, R. & Okuda, T. (2011). Beliefs about Language Learning, Learning Strategy Use, and Self-efficacy/confidence of EFL Learners with and without Living-abroad Experience. Sophia Linguistica. Vol. 59, 151-184.

Jeharsae, F. (2012). English Oral Communication Problems and Strategies Used by Thai Employees in an International Workplace to Communicate with Native and Non-Native English Speaking Customers. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Kaminskiene, L. & Januilene, A. (2006). Problem-Based Learning in the Academic Setting: Language Teaching Issues. Santalka, Filologija. Edukologija. Vol. 14(2), 1822-4318.

Kankaanranta, A. (2010). BELF Competence as Business Knowledge of Internationally Operating Business Professionals. Journal of Business Communication. Vol. 47(4), 380-407.

Kim Hua, T. Nor Fariza Mohd. Nor & Mohamed Nayef Jaradat. (2012). Communication Strategies Among EFL Students: An Examination Of Frequency Of Use And Types Of Strategies Used. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 12(3), 831-848.

Kryzhko, O. (2015). Diverging Interpretations in German-Russian Business Communication. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Louhiala-Salminen, L. (2002). The Fly’s Perspective: Discourse in the Daily Routine of a Business Manager. English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 21, 211-231.

Louhiala-Salminen, L. & Kankaanranta, A. (2011). Professional Communication in a Global Business Context: The Notion of Global Communicative Competence. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. Vol. 54(3), 244-261.

Makhmutov M. I. (1972). Theory and Practice of Problem Based Education. Kazan: Tatknigoizdat.

Marina, O. & Rajprasit, K. (2014). Investigating the Impact of Personality Factors on Perceived Communication Mobility of Non-native English Speaking Thai Professionals in International Companies. PASAA Journal. Vol. 47, 61-96.

Marina, O. & Smirnova O. (2013). Communication Mobility and Environment for Its Development. PASAA Journal of Language Teaching and Learning. Vol. 45, 167-182.

McCroskey, J. C. & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self-report as an Approach to Measuring Communication Competence. Communication Research Reports. Vol. 5(2), 108-113.

Okhotnikova A.V., Rasskazova, T.P. & Verbitskaya, N.O. (2015). Instrumental Approach to the Development of General English Language Skills for the Purpose of University Professors’ International Professional Communication. Problems of Modern Science and Education. Vol. 3.

Omar, Z., Embi, M. A. & Yunus, M. M. (2012). Learners’ Use of Communication Strategies in an Online Discussion via Facebook. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 64, 535-544.

Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Daley, C.E. & Bailey, P. (1999). I’m So Anxious about Learning a Foreign Language: Path Analysis Modeling of the Role of Anxiety in Second Language Acquisition. Paper presented the Annual Meeting of the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Lahti, Finland.

Pratoomrat, P. & Rajprasit, K. (2014). Exploring Current Situations and Corporate Needs of English Language Use in Workplace: Thai Professionals’ Voices to Tertiary Education. Veridian E-Journal. Vol. 7(1).

Quinto E. J. M. (2015). Attitude and Motivation towards a Working Language: Case of East Timorese Students in the Philippines. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 21(1), 1-12.

Raina, R. & Pande, N. (2012). Communication Competence of Indian IT & ITeS Sector. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. Vol. 47(3), 511-526.

Rogerson-Revell, P. (2007). Using English for International Business: A European Case Study. English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 26, 103-120.

Verapornvanichkul, P. (2011). A Survey of Problems in Oral Communication Skills When Dealing with English Speaking Clients: A Case Study of Employees at One of the Big 4 Audit Firms in Thailand. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Thammasart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Walker, A. & Leary H. (2009). A Problem Based Learning Meta-Analysis: Differences across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and Assessment Levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. Vol. 3(1), 12-45.

Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning Purpose and Language Use. London: Oxford University Press.

Wozniak, S. (2010).Language Needs Analysis from a Perspective of International Professional Mobility: The Case of French Mountain Guides. English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 29, 243-252.

Young, R. F. (2010). Discursive Practice in Language Learning and Teaching. Plenary Delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics Atlanta, Georgia, USA.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157