Online cultural exchanges between students of different nationalities may be quite common in this digital age but expanding and adjusting them to include new and more specialized participants can be a challenging task. The Online Cultural Exchange Program (OCEP), currently hosted by the University of Miyazaki (Japan) has been functioning successfully since 2007 (see Araki, Shirasaka, and Larson, 2008), gradually expanding its scope from nursing students alone to include engineering and agriculture majors, consisting largely of online written personal introductions and light-hearted cultural exchanges. However, recent planned expansions of the program into the Faculty of Medicine between the host university in Japan and a new participant in Vietnam has demanded a re-evaluation of what is expected from the program with regard to its utility for medical students. In order to develop a focus suited to the academic and professional needs of medical students in both the hosting university (Miyazaki, Japan) and the new Vietnamese participant (Haiphong University of Medicine and Pharmacy) a pre-program survey was designed by the authors in order to gauge medical students’ expectations, specific interests, preferences, anxieties, and abilities to fruitfully participate in such a program. In this paper, some salient results of these surveys are presented, along with the implications of moving the program towards a more professional and academic focus, and cultural factors that may affect participant expectations and potential outcomes. We expect that the data generated from these surveys may inform and influence similar international online exchange and learning programs being established elsewhere.

Keywords: online cultural exchange programs; medical students; CALL programs; Japan; Vietnam

DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2201-06

Araki T., Shirasaka, K. & Larson, E. (2008). On the Effectiveness of Web-based Content and Language Integrated Learning Projects for Nursing Students. English Education and ESP, June 2008, 105-118.

Beatty, K. & Nunan, D. (2004). Computer-mediated collaborative learning. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and

Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 165-183.

Bourques, M. N. (2006). Epals to motivate students: How a fully integrated email exchange can help motivate low-level students.

JALTCALL Journal, 2(3), 2006, 15-28.

Cho, H. (2015). Two Faces of Collaboration: A Critical perspective on Effects of Collaboration in Learner’s Corpus Consultation. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 15(3), 1-12.

Davis, B. H., & Ye-Ling, C. (1994). Long distance collaboration with on-line conferencing. TESOL Journal, 4(2), 28–31.

Fedderholdt, K. (2001). An email exchange project between non-native speakers of English. ELT Journal, 55(3), 273-280.

Fotos, S. (2004). Writing as talking: E-mail exchange for promoting proficiency and motiva¬tion in the foreign language classroom. In S. Fotos & C. Browne (Eds.), New Perspectives on CALL for Second and Foreign Language Classrooms (pp. 109-129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kern, R. (2006) Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 4(1), 183–210.

Kikuchi, K. & Otsuka, T. (2008). Investigating the use of social networking services in Japanese EFL classrooms. JALTCALL Journal, 4(1), 40-52.

Nguoi, C. & Ahmad, A. (2015). Meaning Negotiation of LEP Learners in Communicative Tasks. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 21(3), 175-190

Nguyen, L. (2010). Computer mediated collaborative learning within a communicative language teaching approach: A sociocultural perspective. Asian EFL Journal, 12(1), 212-233.

Nutta, J. Spector-Cohen, E. (2002) Exploring culture from a distance: A U.S./Israeli e-mail exchange project. TESOL Journal, Volume 11(4), 21–26.

O’Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the “other side”: Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 118-144.

O'Dowd, R. & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with 'failed communication' in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623-642.

O’Dowd, R. & Ware, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 173 – 188.

Ware, P. (2005). “Missed” Communication in Online Communication Tensions in a German-American Telecollaboration. Language. Learning and Technology, 9(2), 64-89.

Warschauer, M (1996). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and com¬munication. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 29-46). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.

Warschauer, M. (2000). Online learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp. 41-58). New York: Cambridge University Press.