Dimensions of eWOM Credibility on the Online Purchasing Activities among Consumers Through Social Media

Nor Amira Baharuddin, Mohammad Yaacob

Abstract


Word of mouth (WOM) communication has become a thoughtful information-sharing medium which can affect consumers’ buying decisions and attitudes in the direction of product categorizations and brands. Conventional word of mouth (WOM) is an outdated method for sharing thoughts and has existed as far back as individuals traded data which now evolved to the new form of word of mouth which is the electronic word of mouth (eWOM). This study attempts to analyse the dimensions of eWOM credibility on online purchasing activities among consumers through social media. This study employs a quantitative method as the paradigm of methodology in gathering the data for this research. The questionnaires were distributed to 260 respondents. The result of this study has been analysed well as aligned with the research questions as well as the research objectives. The analysis revealed that all three major dimensions which are quality, rating and recommendation consistency had significantly underpinned the eWOM credibility on the online purchasing activities among consumers through social media and a new measurement model also had been developed. The relationship between the dimensions and the differences in the dimensions between consumers of different age and gender were also being analysed in this study where each condition showed dissimilar but accurate results. All the research questions had been thoroughly answered and the research objectives of this research had achieved as well. It is hoped that this study may contribute to the related field in the future.

 

Keywords: Word of mouth, electronic word of mouth, credibility, online purchasing, social media.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), 291-295.

Attia, A. M., Aziz, N., & Friedman, B. A. (2012). The impact of social networks on behavioural change: A conceptual framework. World Review of Business Research, 2, 91-108.

Balter, D., & Butman, J. (2005). Grapevine: The new art of word-of-mouth marketing. London: Penguin Group.

Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 166-177.

Bertrand, M., & Bouchard, S. (2008). Applying the technology acceptance model to VR with people who are favourable to its use. Journal of Cyber Therapy & Rehabilitation, 1(2).

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.

Brown, J., & Reingen, P. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350-362.

Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: Do consumers use them?. Advances in Consumer Research, 129-134.

Cheung, C., & Thadani, D. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Desicion Support Systems, 461-470.

Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of online consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9-38.

Chu, S.-C., & Kamal, S. (2008). The effect of perceived blogger credibility and argument quality on message elaboration and brand attitudes. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 26-37.

Doh, S.-J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2009). How consumers evaluate eWOM (Electronic Word-of-Mouth) messages. Cyber Psychology & Behavior.

Eccleston, D., & Griseri, L. (2008). How does web 2.0 stretch traditional influencing patterns. International Journal of Market Research, 50(5), 591-161.

Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Engel, J., Blackwell, R., & Kegerreis, R. (1969). How information is used to adopt an innovation. Journal of Advertising Research, 9(4), 3-8.

Erkan, I. (2014). Vine: Do you miss it? Electronic word of mouth on the social networking site, Vine. International Journal of Business and Information, 9(4), 461-473.

Gogoi, B. (2013). Study of antecedents of purchase intention and its effect on brand loyalty of private label brand of apparel. International Journal of Sales & Marketing, 3(2), 73-86.

Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Ontario, Canada: group.bmj.com.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.

Hoe, J., Dastane, O., & Selvaraj, K. (2018). Predicting consumer perception and its impact on purchase intention for residential property market. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 5(2), 59-77.

Iduozee, E. (2015). The credibility of online consumer reviews. Tempere, Finland: University of Tampere.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2012). Social media: Back to the roots and back to the future. Journal of Systems and Information, 101-104.

Keller. (2007). Unleashing the power of word of mouth: Creating brand advocacy to drive growth. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 448-452.

Keller, E., & Libai, B. (2009). A holistic approach to the measurement of WOM. ESOMAR Worldwide Media Measurement Conference. Stockholm.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Methodology in the social sciences: Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Lange-Faria, W., & Elliot, S. (2012). Understanding the role of social media in destination marketing. Tourismos. An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, 7(1).

Lau, G. T., & Ng, S. (2001). Individual and situational factors influencing negative word-of-mouth behaviour. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18(3), 163-178.

Marangunic, N., & Granic, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access Information Society, 14, 81–95.

McGriff, J. A. (2012). A conceptual topic in marketing management: The emerging need for protecting and managing brand equity: The case of online consumer brand boycotts. International Management Review, 8(1), 49-54.

Mirabi, V., Akbariyeh, H., & Tahmasebifard, H. (2015). A study of factors affecting on customers purchases intention. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST), 2(1).

Mohsin, M. (2019, March 7). 10 social media statistics you need to know in 2019. Oberlo. Retrieved from https://my.oberlo.com/blog/social-media-marketing-statistics

Naz, F. (2014). Word of mouth and its impact on marketing. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(1), 1-4.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Nyilasy, G. (2006). Word of mouth: What we really know - and what we don't. London, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Okazaki, S. (2009). Social influence model and electronic word of mouth. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 439-472.

Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Potter, W. J. (2005). Media literacy (3rd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Priyanka, S., & Kumar, A. (2013). Understanding the evolution of technology acceptance model. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 1(6), 144-148.

Robertson, T. S., & Kassarjian, H. H. (1991). Handbook of consumer behavior. NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Romani, S. (2006). Price misleading advertising: Effects on trustworthiness toward the source of information and willingness to buy. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 130-138.

Sekaran, U. (2006). Research method for business: A skill building approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Sekaran, U. (2006). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.

Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 76-94.

Shah, S., Aziz, J., Jaffari, A., Waris, S., Ejaz, W., Fatima, M., & Sherazi, S. (2012). The impact of brands on consumer purchase intentions. Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 105-110.

Shrestha, S. (2016). Influencing factors on consumer buying behaviour of smart phones. Turku, Finland: Turku University of Applied Sciences.

Taghizadeh, H., Taghipourian, M., & Khazaei, A. (2013). The effect of customer satisfaction on word of mouth communication. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2569-2575.

Teo, T. (2013). A comparison of non-tested models in explaining teachers' intention to use technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3).

Trusov, M., Bucklin, R., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 90-102.

Tsao, W.-C., & Hsieh, M.-T. (2012). Exploring how relationship quality influences positive eWOM: The importance of customer commitment. Journal of Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(7-8), 821-835.

Ullah, N., & Hussain, M. (2015). Impact of unethical advertising, misleading information or deceptive advertising on customer purchasing intention with mediating effect of word of mouth: Case of Pakistan. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 1(4), 49-69.

Wathen, N. C., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134-144.

Winter, G. (2000). A comparative discussion of the notion of 'validity' in qualitative and quantitative research. The Qualitative Report, 4(3), 1-14. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol4/iss3/4


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528